كريبتو إسلام | Crypto Islam pinned a photo

Channel
كريبتو إسلام | Crypto Islam
@CrypoIslam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,050subscribers
-670 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001999207467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CrypoIslam |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CrypoIslam |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:55 | 48,050 | -23 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 48,073 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:55 | 48,072 | -30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:10 | 48,102 | -37 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 48,139 | -17 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 48,156 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 48,165 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 48,178 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 48,183 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 48,187 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 48,192 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 48,198 | -10 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 48,208 | -29 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:46 | 48,237 | -10 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:09 | 48,247 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 48,259 | -25 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 48,284 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:05 | 48,288 | -8 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 48,296 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 48,306 | first reading |
Engagement
95 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.8%
- avg views ÷ 48,050 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,160
- 38 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.662%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 95 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 95 (15 July 2026 – 2 November 2026) |
| Views total | 234,170 |
| Reactions total | 1,537 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 07:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 9m 25s
- Average length
- 1m 03s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,657 reactions across 87 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6,483 | 67.1% | |
| 💔 | 1,776 | 18.4% | |
| 👍 | 496 | 5.14% | |
| 🔥 | 311 | 3.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 299 | 3.10% | |
| 💯 | 292 | 3.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 87 of the 95 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,657 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 95 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 787
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 20
- of 90 we hold a reading for · 22%
- Most on one post
- 521
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CrypoIslam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 95 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
حتى في ظل السوق الدموي، ومع تزايد شكاوى المتداولين من اختراق منصة Binance، تواصل صفقات طلاب أكاديمياتنا السابقة ضرب الأهداف 🎯 تقلبات السوق وهبوطه لا تعني التوقف عن التداول، بل هنا تظهر قيمة العلم والانضباط والصبر، وهنا تبرز القيمة الحقيقية لأكاديميتنا! ✅ نحن لا نعلّمك فقط متى تدخل الصفقة، بل نعلّمك كيف تتعامل مع مختلف ظروف السوق بثبات ووعي. 📩 للتسجيل والاستفسار، تواصلوا معنا عبر: @cryptoislam_academy
❤22
🚀 INCRYPTO ASTRA مؤشر احترافي لاقتناص فرص الكريبتو، مخصص لأصحاب القنوات لتوفير إشارات تداول جاهزة لقنواتهم الخاصة. ✅ تداول SPOT فقط. وايضا متاح الاشتراك للافراد ✅ صفقات متوافقة مع الضوابط الشرعية. 📊 من 30 إلى 50 صفقة أسبوعياً. 🏆 نسبة نجاح تتراوح بين 85% و91%. 📈 نتائج شهر أكتوبر: https://t.me/InCryptoOfficial1/22501 💎 متاح الاشتراك الفردي للأفراد. 📢 المجموعة الرسمية: https://t.me/InCryptoOfficial1 💬 الدعم والاستفسارات…
❤19❤🔥4👍4
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2
كريبتو إسلام | Crypto Islam pinned «📢 تذكير بخصوص الإعلانات الخارجية في قناة كريبتو إسلام السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، نود تذكيركم بأن الإعلانات الخارجية مستمرة في قناة كريبتو إسلام، تحت إدارة إيهاب الحسني. نحرص على مراجعة المشاريع قبل نشرها، والتأكد قدر الإمكان من طبيعتها ومصداقيتها،…»
📢 تذكير بخصوص الإعلانات الخارجية في قناة كريبتو إسلام السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته، نود تذكيركم بأن الإعلانات الخارجية مستمرة في قناة كريبتو إسلام، تحت إدارة إيهاب الحسني. نحرص على مراجعة المشاريع قبل نشرها، والتأكد قدر الإمكان من طبيعتها ومصداقيتها، مع التأكيد أن نشر الإعلان لا يُعد ضمانًا للمشروع أو توصية بالاستثمار فيه، ولا نتحمل مسؤولية تعاملات الأفراد مع الجهات المُعلنة. كما نؤكد التزامنا بعدم قبول إعلانا…
❤19👍9
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤2❤🔥1
رابط المنصة: ➡️ https://t.me/Empire_Strategic_Pool_bot?start=ref_FXN3D9 رابط القناة الرسمية: ➡️ https://t.me/+cD20S_X8r-tmM2Zk
❤12
🌹 السلام عليكم و رحمة الله عائلة كريبتو اسلام الكريمة. منصة ESP التي تم الاعلان لها هي منصة تنتمي لقناة EMPIRE يعرفها اغلبكم و هي قناة عريقة و قديمة في هذا المجال و نثق فيها و في اصحابها و لله الحمد. و لكن و مع هذا نود توضيح ضرورة استثمار جزء راس المال الذي لا يلحق اي ضرر او ضيق بحياتك الشخصية و ان تكون تستطيع ان تصبر عليه و تستثمره و حتى ان لا قدر الله تخسره لان سوق الكريبتو سوق متقلب و الاستثمار فيه غير مضمون حتى…
❤20💯4👍1
EMPIRE STRATEGIC POOL 🤖 منصة متكاملة من إنتاج Empire Trading الاسم المعروف في مجتمع الكريبتو العربي منذ عام 2022 جاءت ESP لتقدّم تجربة مختلفة تجمع بين الاستثمار وأدوات تحليل الأسواق ضمن منظومة واحدة مع الالتزام بالضوابط الشرعية المعتمدة في نموذج عملها. 🟡 استثمار منظّم عبر دورات 🟡 أدوات متقدمة لتحليل الأسواق وتدفّق الأوامر 🟡 أداة للتحقق من حكم العملات وفقًا لكريبتو اسلام. 🟡 أداة لمتابعة آخر أخبار الاقتصاد العالمي. …
❤11💯2🔥2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
كريبتو إسلام | Crypto Islam pinned «تنويه 🟢🟢: تم تغير اسم معرف حساب الدعم الخاص بالاكادمية الى @academy_support_ci حذاري من التواصل مع اي حساب اخر لان فيه نصابين يستعملون معرفات اخرى 🔴🔴🔴 للتذكير نحن لا نتواصل معك اولا»
Showing the 12 most recent of 95 posts we hold for @CrypoIslam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@CrypoIslam edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 26 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @CrypoIslam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 6 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 25 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 3
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@AirdropCryptoBotss · 3851 postCrypto Elzaeim
@Crypto_Elzaeim · 8481 postSniperShot
@Snipershot69 · 1,0241 postTAWSAcrypto
@TAWSAcrypto · 1,3871 postGolden Whale
@goldenwhale3100 · 18,3381 postتوصيات كريبتو مباح Halal Crypto Recommendations
@halal_crypto_recommendations · 1,3381 postM Profitx 💸
@mprofitx · 9791 postMVP Chart
@mvp_chart · 1,2751 postPro⚖️Trading Academy 💎📊
@protradink · 1,2971 postThe Easy Crypto plus
@theeasycryptoplus · 1,5351 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@Ummah_Trading · 12,7433 postsHalalDrops - Free Air drops
@Halal_AirDrops · 962 posts💲 TRADING DARSLIKLARI
@Bolajak_Trader · 511 postCryptoZone Trading
@pixelcoinns · 2021 postرابح تحليل البتكوين , توصيات العملات الرقمية crypto
@rab7_crypto · 3391 postTrayding KuCoin Halal treyding
@Treyding_KuCoin · 211 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@cr_halal · 106,143#1
@InvestClub_Groupe · 5,293#2
@crypto_currencyME · 100,820#3
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,758#4
@InCryptoOfficial1 · 2,732#5
@protrading36 · 29,685#6
@paradoxfth · 8,709#7
@A7kem · 24,350#8
@cryptomena1 · 103,119#9
@kingscalpbas · 1,847#10
@crypto_News24_Z · 28,875#11
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 60,463#12
@InCryptoCourses · 1,506#13
@ArabicWhalesSignals · 8,460#14
@Ahmedf12crepto · 707 (as read 26 August 2026)#15
@scalping_Signalss · 24,283#16
@RahhalVIP · 9,276#17
@DamenP2P · 14,664#18
@lafichart · 34,579#19
@ozarktrade · 77,361#20
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,475#21
@fibotrades1 · 1,688#22
@cryptomax801 · 3,996#23
@F_35cu · 24,754#24
@crypto_ahmd · 7,676#25
@protradink · 1,297#26
@Adamkamal144 · 43,332#27
@BitcoinNews_24 · 14,188#28
@Abod_Cryptocurrency · 11,331#29
@Cryptocurrencyy9 · 67,979#30
@ZakariyaAcademy1 · 15,747#31
@mrcryptoyyt · 36,279#32
@Crypto_trading_moja · 9,423#33
@himaih · 19,698#34
@cryptoforlaith · 3,367#35
@WHALENEWSSW · 3,592#36
@ForexBreakingNews · 369,177#37
@scalping_Midd · 18,536#38
@Ramooscrypto · 4,818#39
@maskaxmaal_channel · 5,460#40
@Whale200 · 11,073#41
@moussatrade · 3,433#42
@vacahsb1825 · 16,091#43
@Hamam74 · 48,065#44
@Maankaliza2 · 2,737#45
@traderbrother0 · 7,594#46
@NEWS_MONEY_MARKETS · 1,945#47
@theeasycrypto · 8,494#48
@OfficialZcrypto · 11,083#49
@Learn_With_Shaimmaa · 11,597#50
@Apollobot7 · 5,304#51
@abusalamachart · 10,924#52
@AZmemecoins · 5,617#53
@leacked_coursesVIP · 45,892#54
@qusai_crypto · 19,394#55
@yousefbtc · 6,251#56
@cryptowaleed77 · 9,087#57
@MarkVestis_Business · 728#58
@CTS2023m · 1,019#59
@marketia_trading · 626#60
@firnascrypto · 2,727#61
@FARHODTRADER · 2,192#62
@EATrading1 · 250,698#63
@BIK_CORPORATION · 1,506#64
@suroqa_trading_channel · 1,285#65
@abdallaway · 12,949#66
@Wolf_Trader11 · 11,398#67
@shimaa_Feactal_Vip · 16,931#68
@thegreenwaysignals · 2,756#69
@h2results · 6,556#70
@KeyGen_Channel · 173,467#71
@zubayr_crypto_analiz · 299#72
@dogs · 6,530,614#73
@abutradiing · 8,462#74
@abdullohtreydr · 4,259#75
@halalsignal · 4,139#76
@HalalTrades1 · 1,824#77
@signal_spotbtc · 3,143#78
@prismspot · 4,107#79
@gismoxancrypto · 18,712#80
@cryptooc1ty · 193#81
@quran3mmm · 856#82
@AR_INSAYDER · 401#83
@investclubGlobal_ENG · 1,041#84
@cripto_spot · 3,522#85
@MadinaCrypto · 19,907#86
@prisminsights · 1,548#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@protrading36 · 29,685
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@A7kem · 24,350
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
@cr_halal · 106,143
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
@amirdzb · 134,281
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 August 2026
@dz1001tech · 316,505
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 12 August 2026
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,475
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@mirasamir2022 · 27,553
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@adamkdrxx · 25,178
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 September 2026
@ozarktrade · 77,361
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,758
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
@F_35cu · 24,754
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 September 2026
@crypto_currencyME · 100,820
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@MrAmwal · 21,147
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 September 2026
@shabancrypto · 82,096
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 60,463
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@kedhab · 18,814
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 5 October 2026
@usthb_legetime · 39,246
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 24 September 2026
@rcrdz1 · 41,320
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
@qusai_crypto · 19,394
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 September 2026
@Gulf_Pump · 36,331
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
@crypto0omazen · 30,911
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
@hadibrayteh · 50,733
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
@OKXArabicChannel · 61,620
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@crypto_News24_Z · 28,875
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كريبتو إسلام | Crypto Islam” (@CrypoIslam), 48,050 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CrypoIslam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.