1001 Tech pinned a video

Channel
1001 Tech
@dz1001tech
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
323,679subscribers
-2,121 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001416319930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dz1001tech |
| Description | قناة تقنية جزائرية تهتم بنشر كل جديد في المجال. للتواصل الإحترافي والأعمال يرجى ارسال ايميل : [email protected] |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dz1001tech |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 323,679 | -91 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 323,770 | -66 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 323,836 | -91 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 323,927 | -104 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 324,031 | -194 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 324,225 | -161 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 324,386 | -108 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 324,494 | -72 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 324,566 | -98 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 324,664 | -167 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 324,831 | -139 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 324,970 | -146 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 325,116 | -85 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 325,201 | -83 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 325,284 | -67 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 325,351 | -84 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 325,435 | -107 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 325,542 | -125 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 325,667 | -109 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 325,776 | first reading |
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.12%
- avg views ÷ 323,679 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 29,500
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.547%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (27 June 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 620,000 |
| Reactions total | 3,391 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈936
- Videos
- ≈301
- Links
- ≈2,680
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 15m 52s
- Average length
- 1m 27s
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,257 reactions across 31 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,374 | 83.2% | |
| 👍 | 298 | 5.67% | |
| 🤯 | 100 | 1.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 80 | 1.52% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 1.41% | |
| 🫡 | 69 | 1.31% | |
| ⚡ | 59 | 1.12% | |
| 😁 | 58 | 1.10% | |
| 😍 | 42 | 0.799% | |
| 👏 | 38 | 0.723% | |
| 🏆 | 27 | 0.514% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 0.247% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 0.228% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 0.19% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.057% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 21
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 11
- of 31 we hold a reading for · 35%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dz1001tech. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 32 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🔻رابط المشاركة في المسابقة على الفيسبوك https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1CX1f6o6SR/?mibextid=wwXIfr 🔻ادخل شارك ايضا فالإنستقرام من هنا 👈 لزيادة فرص الربح تاعك 🔥 https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dcg6jl-ONBx/?igsi=NHlkbG9ka3VzbXB0
❤46👍2
بعد قليل كاين مسابقة في الفيسبوك و الإنستغرام لربح خمس أجهزة إلكترونية كهرومنزلية وجد روحك تشارك وتستفاد ايضا ممكن تربح هنا ولهيك اذا عندك زهر 🙄تسمى شارك فالمنصتين ✅
❤148👍13⚡8🔥5👏3🫡3
طريقة سهلة وبسيطة لمعرفة المواقع و التطبيقات المرتبطة بحساب Google الخاص بك هاذا هو الرابط : https://myaccount.google.com/linkedapps?pli=1
❤85👍26🫡8🔥5⚡1
وزارة العمل أطلقت اليوم منصة رقمية جديدة باسم «تبليغ»، مخصصة لاستقبال التبليغات حول حالات الفساد المحتملة. المنصة تسمح للمواطنين بالتبليغ عن ممارسات الفساد اللي يواجهوها أثناء تعاملاتهم مع الإدارة المركزية، المصالح غير الممركزة والمؤسسات التابعة للقطاع. والفكرة هنا هي أن التبليغ يكون رقمياً، سريعاً ومؤمّناً، مع آلية لحماية المعلومات الشخصية للمبلّغين. 🌐 المنصة: tabligh.mtess.gov.dz برأيكم، هل المنصات الرقمية تقد…
❤254❤🔥18🔥13⚡6👍6👏4🤯2
راكو تسمعوني؟ تشوفوني مليح؟راهي تبان الشاشة ؟ لا لا ما بان والو إذا درت اجتماع اونلاين من قبل فأكيد هاذ الجمل جازو عليك أكثر من مرة المشكل أن الاجتماع لي كان مفروض يديلك 20 دقيقة، يقدر يروح منو ربع او نصف ساعة غير باش نسڤمو الصوت، الكاميرا ولا مشاركة الشاشة اليوم الـvisioconférence ولات جزء عادي من الخدمة، سواء كنت تخدم مع فريق في نفس المدينة ولا حتى مع ناس في ولايات وبلدان مختلفة بمنصات مختلفة Google Meet، Zoom، M…
❤87⚡3👍3
هل سبقك لك انك جربت منتجات Geant في المنزل وكيف كانت تجربتكم ؟ خصيصا جماعة Rs8 Mini الغني عن التعريف 😅مزالو يمشي 🧐
❤85👍34
للناس لي حابة تربح استضافة ويب لعام مامل و GPU ادخل خلي تعليق وبصحتك https://www.instagram.com/p/DcLniw6jrHS/?igsh=dnQzaW9ya3BjaHow
❤80😍8
🔴🚫⚠️ حـــــــذاري ‼️ المختصر المفيد لا تقم بتحميل أي تطبيق من خارج المتجر الرسمي على هاتفك ولا تضغط على اي رابط يوصلك. ❌هذه الأيام كاين طريقة جديدة راه يتم بها اخــ-تـ-ـراق هواتف بعض الجزائريين والوصول لتطبيق بريدي موب وسرقة اموالك، اولا الطريقة اولا تستهدف هواتف اندرويد. ❌ تبدا من تثبيت تطبيقات APK من خارج المتجر بطبيعة الحال اشهرها حاليا ولي راني نشوف راهي دور NexoTV APK (نسخة معدلة من التطبيق لانو حتى الموقع ما…
❤242🫡27🤯12👍7
🔴 وزير السكن #طارق_بلعريبي: الشروع في توزيع أولى سكنات برنامج "عدل 3" بعدد من الولايات في الفاتح نوفمبر المقبل بمناسبة الذكرى الـ 72 لاندلاع ثورة التحرير. 🔴 وزير السكن #طارق_بلعريبي: الوزارة شرعت في توطين برنامج "عدل 3" عبر مختلف الولايات وفق رؤية عمرانية جديدة، تقوم على إنشاء أقطاب حضرية كخيار "استراتيجي" لإرساء نموذج عمراني حديث.
❤112😁22👍11⚡4
التسجيلات مستمرة لنهاية سبتمبر لكن من المستحسن تشوف تخصصك من الان قبل مايتعمرو وماتلقاش مقاعد شاغرة
❤151👍5
كاش كسوف في هذه الأثناء عندكم وشكون عندو عدسة محمية وقدر يصور !
❤117👍15
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @dz1001tech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 208,893 of 1,625,954entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@CrypoIslam · 48,419#1
@HelpTechDz07 · 7,597#2
@visa1001visa · 16,879#3
@crypto_currencyME · 105,596#4
@ForexBreakingNews · 365,720#5
@InCryptoOfficial1 · 2,585#6
@cryptomena1 · 105,598#7
@bassitatech · 5,270#8
@crypto_News24_Z · 29,607#9
@protrading36 · 22,038#10
@EmpireFreelance · 16,839#11
@scalping_Signalss · 24,804#12
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 31,724#13
@youtradingchat · 7,319#14
@paradoxfth · 8,902#15
@ozarktrade · 79,738#16
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,866#17
@cr_halal · 108,100#18
@InvestClub_Groupe · 5,465#19
@t7nwork · 8,589#20
@moussatrade · 3,500#21
@t7nimmigration · 6,802#22
@thegreenwaysignals · 2,839#23
@tradinglibrary12 · 19,627#24
@WhalesHunterChannel · 5,003#25
@t7nsport · 1,917#26
@EATrading1 · 252,786#27
@amirdzb · 142,646#28
@NEWS_MONEY_MARKETS · 1,996#29
@cryptofam_fr · 219,564#30
@mrcryptoyyt · 37,954#31
@MarketLens1 · 4,021#32
@BitcoinNews_24 · 10,064#33
@quran3mmm · 862#34
@jibtabori · 15,406#35
@Victims_3M · 1,175#36
@Dawaret · 3,983#37
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@amirdzb · 142,646
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 August 2026
@SAMI_AIB · 180,462
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 12 August 2026
@djalilbng · 49,292
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 26 August 2026
@golden_borodutch · 66,132
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
@nafi3_bac_dz_1954 · 187,072
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 August 2026
@bac_dztop · 50,502
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 August 2026
@ozarktrade · 79,738
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@infinitybac20 · 72,916
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
@amine_zeddoun · 89,169
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
@akramghassanphilo2023 · 52,842
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@profketficherif · 143,078
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@ayoub_science_bac_2027 · 45,811
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1001 Tech” (@dz1001tech), 323,679 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dz1001tech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.