Eth ارتداد من مستويات الدعم

Channel
توصيات حيتان العرب VIP 🐳
@ArabicWhalesSignals
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,460subscribers
-356 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001908833148 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArabicWhalesSignals |
| Description | قناة تابعة لمجتمع حيتان العرب تقدم توصيات وتحليل وتتبع السوق اذا كان لديك اي سؤال انضم الى مجموعتنا @Arabicwhales جميع وسائل التواصل الاجتماعي الخاصة بمجتمعنا تجدها هنا https://linktr.ee/Arabicwhales Arabicwhales.com |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArabicWhalesSignals |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:51 | 8,460 | -23 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:38 | 8,483 | -13 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:51 | 8,496 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:05 | 8,516 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 8,524 | -22 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:49 | 8,546 | -12 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 8,558 | -17 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 12:06 | 8,575 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 8,589 | -38 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 8,627 | -40 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 8,667 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 8,675 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 8,682 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 8,687 | -28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:28 | 8,715 | -14 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 8,729 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 8,731 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 8,744 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 8,762 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 8,768 | first reading |
Engagement
138 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.58%
- avg views ÷ 8,460 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 472
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.737%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 138 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 138 (29 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 10,853 |
| Reactions total | 46 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 10:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,420
- Videos
- ≈235
- Links
- ≈2,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 24s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
713 reactions across 117 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 395 | 55.4% | |
| 👍 | 109 | 15.3% | |
| 🔥 | 70 | 9.82% | |
| 😁 | 57 | 7.99% | |
| 🐳 | 28 | 3.93% | |
| 👌 | 21 | 2.95% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 2.81% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.842% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.421% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.281% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.281% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 138 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 713 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 136 we hold a reading for · 0.7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArabicWhalesSignals. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 138 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🚨🚨 عندك فكرة كم الأموال المسروقة و اللي تم تهكيرها من مشاريع الديفاي و المنصات ؟ لا تنصدم لكن الرقم هو 27.59B$ مليار دولار و هذه هي لائحة 8 مشاريع بالترتيب كاكبر اختراقات ☠️ • منصة Binance خسرت 6.3B$ مليار دولار • مشروع Lubian خسر 3.5B$ مليار دولار • منصة Bybit خسرت 1.4B$ مليار دولار • مشروع Ronin Bridge خسر 624M$ مليون دولار • مشروع Poly Network خسر 611M$ مليون دولار • جسر Binance Bridge خسر 570M$ مليون دولا…
ستطلق منصة #OKX غدا مجمع Falsh earn والذي خصصت له المنصة مبلغ مليون USDT لو عندك $BTC او $ETH تحتاج فقط تأكد اشتراكك في الحمله من الرابط الخاص بالحملة وخليك محتفظ بالمبلغ 5 ايام بس اكد اشتراكك من هنا👇 https://www.okx.com/flash-earn/stake-to-earn/151?channelId=60697145 الحدث من 3 إلى 8 نوفمبر 2026
للتذكير أسواق المال يلي مابيخاطر مابيعمل فلوس شتري الخوف وبيع الطمع 😉
👌7
اللهم نسألك علماً نافعا ورزق طيب مبارك فيه❤️
❤5🐳1
صباح الأمل بالله ❤️
❤4
"ليست مفاتيحك، ليست عملاتك" جملة سمعناها كثيراً، وتزداد وزناً بعد كل اختراق فأين تضع معظم عملاتك اليوم؟ 1. منصة مركزية 2. محفظة باردة 3. محفظة ساخنة ما اختياركم؟ ولماذا؟ اكتبوا لنا في التعليقات 👇 https://x.com/arabicwhales/status/2117054335263858845?a=qhmO_bK8cAqqMX1w5EQ&s=46
عاجل: سحب أكثر من 3,750,000,000 دولار من منصة "بينانس" (Binance) خلال 10 ساعات، وذلك عقب استئناف المنصة لعمليات السحب.
🔥5
في ظل تطور الذكاء الاصطناعي هل قد تصل عصابات كوريا الشمالية الى المحفظة التي تمتلك اكثر من مليون حبة #BTC محفظة ساتوشي مؤسس البيتكوين ؟ https://x.com/ArabicWhales/status/2116901098539860042?a=0BsOig0fNiNR9AwASro&s=19
❤1
منصة باينس تعيد السحب الان ب امكان المستخدمين من الايداع والسحب عاده منصة باينس للعمل من جديد بالامس FBI قال ان الهكر كان من كوريا الشمالية. عصابات لايمكن ايقافها او الوقوف امامها 😱 https://x.com/ArabicWhales/status/2116899384973832632?a=sO75DL9lHBL--3Ssris&s=19
اختر المنصة التي تستخدمها 👇 الاختيار لكم @ArabicWhales
👍1
قروب المناقشة @ArabicWhales
Showing the 12 most recent of 138 posts we hold for @ArabicWhalesSignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @ArabicWhalesSignals as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 10 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 12 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 14 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
هل ماتزال تؤمن بسوق العملات الرقمية
- نعم ومستمر مهما حصل51%
- لا وأفكر بترك المجال35%
- شي طبيعي بحب المخاطرة26%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
اسباب خسارتك
- الطمع33%
- الاستعجال29%
- التردد18%
- دخول عشوائي28%
- لا تعرف ادارة راس المال15%
- لا تفهم الشموع وتحليل20%
- عدم وضع وقف خساره32%
- رافعة مالية11%
- اسباب اخرى؟7%
- متابع فقط10%
The shares total 203%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 138 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@m2zealaa · 26,829
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
@CrypoIslam · 48,034
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@mrbtcryptonofomi · 18,794
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 October 2026
@BitcoinAlerts0 · 20,754
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
@signalrr · 10,540
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
@Abuzaidcrypto1 · 60,145
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 5 September 2026
@Cryptowhalepump_official · 18,729
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 August 2026
@OKXArabicChannel · 61,479
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@qusai_crypto · 19,382
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 30 September 2026
@Dr_mohAbuJazar · 23,470
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
@protrading36 · 29,616
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 September 2026
@cryptochat22 · 104,813
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@Hamam74 · 47,895
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 24 August 2026
@Abushahincrypto · 131,916
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
@crypto0omazen · 30,647
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026
@Cryptocurrencyy9 · 67,904
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@inv7mind · 21,653
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
@crypto_currencyME · 100,710
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
@EMARATI_ae · 18,739
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 4 October 2026
@Gulf_Pump · 36,260
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026
@ozarktrade · 77,317
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@leacked_coursesVIP · 45,895
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@mrcryptoyyt · 35,771
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 31 August 2026
@hadibrayteh · 52,111
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توصيات حيتان العرب VIP 🐳” (@ArabicWhalesSignals), 8,460 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArabicWhalesSignals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.