Channel
@GCB_Signals
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,282subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414878069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GCB_Signals |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GCB_Signals |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 5,282 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 5,292 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 5,309 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 5,316 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 5,327 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 5,336 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 5,343 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:51 | 5,355 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 5,362 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 5,367 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
244 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 113 | 46.3% | |
| 👍 | 79 | 32.4% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 3.69% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 3.28% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.64% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.23% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 244 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 December 2025 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#BTC 🚨 بعد رحلة هبوط قوية تجاوزت 35% للبتكوين يستقر البتكوين الان في منطقة عرضية و يتحرك ضمن قناة سعرية عرضية ما بين 94768 (تعد منطقة مقاومة) و 84462 (تعد منطقة دعم) لايوجد اي إيجابية في البتكوين ما لم يخترق القناة الى اعلى و العكس صحيح كسر للقناة لاسفل يعني المزيد من الهبوط هناك ترند هابط فرعي داخل القناة العرضية اذا تم اختراقه لاعلى قد يدفع السعر لمنطقة سقف القناة العلوي خليك حذر و بالتوفيق لكم
❤23👍14🥰9❤🔥8🔥8🎉4💯3
#ZEC اعطيناكم عليها اشارة ارفقنا عليها صفقة بالخاص اصابت جميع اهدافها - افضل شيء الان هو المضارية ابتعد عن الصفقات الطويلة الدخول بالخاص متاح مجاناً للمتداولين على منصة GCB بالتوفيق للجميع
❤6🔥4👍2
#LDO 🚨 تم اختراق الترند الهابط بوضوح مع إعادة اختبار ناجحة لمنطقة الطلب حول 0.546 مما يشير الى بداية موجة صاعدة جديدة الحركة الحالية تشير إلى جمع سيولة فوق مناطق المقاومة السابقة. عينكم عليها استمرار الثبات فوق خط الاتجاه يدعم استمرار الصعود بالتوفيق لكم جميعاً
❤5👍3
#DYDX 🚨 تحول الاتجاة الى صاعد مع اختراق خط الترند الهابط بالإضافة الى ظهور دايفرجنس إيجابي على مؤشر القوة النسبية (RSI) بالاضافة الى اختراق موفينج 50 ، مما يشير لجذب سيولة شرائية.. كلها مؤشرات إيجابية عينكم عليها تم نشر صففة عليها بالخاص موضح بها مناطق الدخول و الاهداف بالتوفيق للجميع
❤10👍2
#0G صفقة من الخاص تصيب هدفها الاول✅ يمكنكم متابعتها
🔥5❤1👍1
صفقة على عملة 0g نقاط الدخول : 1.04 - 0.92 الأهداف : الهدف الأول: 1.16 ✅ الهدف الثاني: 1.28 وقف الخسارة: 0.85
❤5👍1
#ZEC 🚨 هناك ارتداد صاعد محتمل بعد اختراق ترند هابط و اختراق مؤشرات موفينج (200 و 50) عينكم عليها تستحق الاهتمام بالتوفيق للجميع
👍6❤3
تصيب هدفها الثاني ✅✅
🔥7👍1
صفقة من الخاص تصيب هدفها الاول ✅ يمكنكم متابعتها
❤4👍3
صفقة على عملة ACT نقاط الدخول : 0.0350 - 0.0300 الأهداف : الهدف الأول: 0.0400 ✅ الهدف الثاني: 0.0470 إيقاف الخسارة: 0.0270
🔥3👍2
#BTC 🚨 صحيح ان البتكوين اخترق القناة الهابطة و لكنة ارتد من اقرب منطقة مقاومة(90585) المحددة لكم مسبقاً على الشارت و فشل في اختراقها الضغط البيعي مسيطر و اذا لم يتجاوز 90600$ و الإغلاق فوقها بشمعة يوم على الأقل فالسيناريو المرجح هو استمرار الهبوط و العكس صحيح اختراقها يفتح المجال لمزيد من الصعود لذلك من المهم مراقبة هذة المنطقة بالتوفيق للجميع
❤6👍6
#TRX 🚨 المؤشرات توضح بداية تغيير الاتجاة مع اختراق الترند الهابط واختباره بنجاح كمستوى دعم جديد عينكم عليها العملة في مكان جيد بالتوفيق لكم جميعاً
👍6❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GCB_Signals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 258,968 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GCB Signals” (@GCB_Signals), 5,282 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GCB_Signals.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.