Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 89 days, net -2,686. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,071–58,563 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 13:36
55,474
-30
3 Nov 2026, 17:05
55,504
-59
2 Nov 2026, 17:55
55,563
-37
1 Nov 2026, 15:21
55,600
-78
31 Oct 2026, 12:19
55,678
-55
30 Oct 2026, 10:09
55,733
-55
29 Oct 2026, 11:50
55,788
-52
28 Oct 2026, 10:28
55,840
-50
27 Oct 2026, 09:51
55,890
-50
26 Oct 2026, 12:16
55,940
-23
25 Oct 2026, 09:01
55,963
-27
24 Oct 2026, 12:34
55,990
-38
23 Oct 2026, 10:56
56,028
-53
22 Oct 2026, 08:08
56,081
-34
21 Oct 2026, 04:26
56,115
-50
20 Oct 2026, 02:08
56,165
-41
18 Oct 2026, 22:59
56,206
-46
17 Oct 2026, 20:01
56,252
-29
16 Oct 2026, 22:36
56,281
-30
15 Oct 2026, 19:58
56,311
first reading
Engagement
79 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 55,474 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.977%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 79 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
79 (13 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
103,764
Reactions total
1,014
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,120
Videos
≈16
Links
≈621
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,761 reactions across 79 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
840
17.6%
🎉
655
13.8%
🔥
639
13.4%
👍
635
13.3%
🤩
631
13.3%
😁
411
8.63%
❤🔥
253
5.31%
😍
252
5.29%
🥰
227
4.77%
💯
214
4.49%
😢
2
0.042%
👎
1
0.021%
👏
1
0.021%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 79 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,761 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 79 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 18 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Hong Kong’s tokenized deposit pilot moves to 24/7 settlement
A bank in Hong Kong’s EnsembleTX pilot can now settle a tokenized deposit transaction with another participating bank on a Sunday night. On November 2, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) announced round-the-clock interbank settlement in tokenized central bank money.
➡️ How settlement changed
🟡 When the pilot began in November 2025, banks settled thr…
Tether’s reserve buffer nearly doubles to $8 billion
Tether’s October 30 update puts its excess reserves at $7.95 billion, up from $4.1 billion at the end of Q2. The figures describe the position on September 30, not today’s balances.
➡️ What backs USDT
🟡 Reported assets totalled $191.45 billion against $183.50 billion in liabilities.
🟡 Direct and indirect holdings of US Treasury bills reached $132.4 billion.
➡️ …
Curve moves beyond EVM with Stellar launch
Curve launched StableSwap on Stellar mainnet on October 29, its first native deployment outside the Ethereum Virtual Machine ecosystem. The trading interface is live in beta.
➡️ What is live
🟡 Users can browse pools, swap assets and supply liquidity.
🟡 StableSwap is designed for assets with closely matched prices, such as two dollar stablecoins.
➡️ What is still coming
…
💳 Visa’s stablecoin settlement pace jumps 10x
Visa says its stablecoin settlement volume has passed a $25 billion annualized pace, ten times the level a year earlier. The company is expanding both blockchain settlement and cards linked to stablecoin balances.
➡️ What changed
🟡 Visa now supports settlement across 10 blockchains, more than double last year’s count
🟡 Its stablecoin-linked card programs have grown bey…
🌏 Three Asian central banks join forces to make stablecoin payments work across borders
Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand are taking a closer look at how digital money could move between countries. Their latest cooperation brings banks, payment giants and crypto companies together under one initiative.
➡️ What happened
🟡 Malaysia's and Thailand's central banks have joined Singapore's BLOOM initiative
🟡 The project …
🇨🇭 Switzerland approves its first spot Bitcoin ETF for retail investors
Switzerland has taken another step toward bringing Bitcoin into traditional finance. Regulator FINMA has approved the country's first spot Bitcoin ETF available to retail investors, with trading expected to begin in November.
➡️ What happened
🟡 BIT Asset Management received approval for its Bitcoin Fund ETF (BBIT)
🟡 The fund will hold Bitcoin …
🏦 Deutsche Bank prepares crypto custody launch with Asia expansion in sight
One of Europe’s largest banks is preparing to enter digital asset custody. Deutsche Bank plans to offer institutional clients secure storage of Bitcoin, Ether and selected stablecoins, with a possible expansion into Asia in 2027.
➡️ What is planned
🟡 The bank aims to introduce its custody service in Germany in 2026, subject to regulatory r…
⚡️ Solana’s reliability improves, but Fidelity spots hidden risks
Solana has gone roughly two years without a reported mainnet outage, according to research from Fidelity’s Center for Applied Technology. But network stability does not automatically mean every decentralization problem has been solved.
➡️ What improved
🟡 Fidelity highlighted progress in Solana’s performance, network resilience and economic security
…
🏛 Tokenized stocks hit an unexpected obstacle: the companies themselves
The push to bring Wall Street equities onchain is facing resistance. Nine US-listed companies have objected to having tokenized versions of their shares traded through OKXICE, the joint venture between OKX and the NYSE’s parent company.
➡️ Who is pushing back
🟡 Broadcom, Verizon, UnitedHealth and CoreWeave are among the companies that filed ob…
💸 Stablecoin transfers could cost 84% less than traditional remittances
A new Borderless.xyz report puts numbers behind one of crypto’s biggest real-world use cases: moving money across borders without the usual banking costs and delays.
➡️ What the data shows
🟡 Sending $200 through stablecoin-funded payment rails costs a median of $2, or 1%
🟡 Traditional remittances cost an estimated $12.72, or 6.36%, using World…
📉 Strategy faces a new risk — and it is not Bitcoin’s price
Michael Saylor’s Strategy may face pressure from traditional stock-market rules rather than crypto volatility. Index provider MSCI has adopted a new methodology that could remove certain digital asset treasury companies from its global indexes.
➡️ What changed
🟡 MSCI’s new rules can exclude companies classified as “non-operating” businesses
🟡 Strategy, Me…
🔐 Ledger unveils $849 wallet after tampered devices found in Asia
Ledger has introduced Atom, a new hardware wallet designed to protect against physical tampering. The announcement comes just days after malicious implants were discovered in Ledger devices sold through a reseller in Asia.
➡️ What makes Atom different
🟡 The $849 device combines crypto wallet security with a smartphone-like design and everyday apps
🟡…
❤14🤩14🔥12👍9😁6🎉3
Showing the 12 most recent of 79 posts we hold for @crypto_showcase_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@crypto_showcase_en edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Share the latest platform @trjrtjjdfhr · 15,949#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 105,232 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto TV @CryproTV_en · 148,344 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 52,152 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Noob @CryptoNoob_en · 73,170 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
UrgentDrop @UrgentDrop · 54,422 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Trade Master @cryptotrademaster · 35,397 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 97,850 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO @TheAnalystCrypto · 65,912 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Farmer 🌽 @FarmerCrypto · 43,810 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Satoshi Tweeted @satoshi_e · 88,417 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Penetration blog 🔩 @cryptopenetration · 33,608 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
Growth Hacker @gr0wth_hack · 68,767 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
Purrfect Laughs @Faaruu_Durii · 53,785 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 24 September 2026
(not)Sad Hamster @notSadHamsters · 64,999 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Aping Den: 100x plays! @apingdegen · 53,726 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr Michael Nehls ⋆ @DrMichael_Nehls_0 · 305,248 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Showcase” (@crypto_showcase_en), 55,474 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_showcase_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.