Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -707. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,571–58,367 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 06:40
57,453
-72
15 Sept 2026, 08:16
57,525
-66
13 Sept 2026, 14:21
57,591
-77
11 Sept 2026, 19:56
57,668
+890
9 Sept 2026, 06:56
56,778
-161
5 Sept 2026, 22:40
56,939
-96
3 Sept 2026, 18:56
57,035
-59
2 Sept 2026, 08:54
57,094
-47
1 Sept 2026, 08:27
57,141
-48
31 Aug 2026, 07:55
57,189
-46
30 Aug 2026, 06:24
57,235
-39
29 Aug 2026, 06:25
57,274
-36
28 Aug 2026, 06:38
57,310
-40
27 Aug 2026, 06:25
57,350
-47
26 Aug 2026, 03:01
57,397
-28
25 Aug 2026, 03:44
57,425
-69
23 Aug 2026, 18:15
57,494
-74
22 Aug 2026, 02:48
57,568
-55
20 Aug 2026, 17:07
57,623
-18
19 Aug 2026, 19:18
57,641
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 57,453 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,400
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
49 (13 July 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
128,059
Reactions total
1,178
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
21 Sept 2026, 02:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,090
Videos
≈16
Links
≈591
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,023 reactions across 49 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
519
17.2%
🎉
387
12.8%
🔥
361
11.9%
🤩
347
11.5%
👍
342
11.3%
❤🔥
253
8.37%
😍
252
8.34%
🥰
227
7.51%
💯
214
7.08%
😁
117
3.87%
😢
2
0.066%
👎
1
0.033%
👏
1
0.033%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,023 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 US sanctions Iran’s BitBank over alleged Bitcoin transfers
The US Treasury has sanctioned Iranian crypto exchange BitBank, saying it was used to process Bitcoin payments linked to Iran’s Strait of Hormuz maritime scheme.
➡️ What happened
🟡 OFAC designated BitBank, its software developer Pishtaz Simorgh and three associates of Iranian financier Babak Zanjani
🟡 Treasury says BitBank helped move hundreds of millio…
📊 More information does not always mean better trades
Markets are overloaded with noise: earnings, macro data, Fed headlines, analyst updates, positioning flows and endless opinions about the next crash or rally.
➡️ What matters now
🟡 The real edge is not collecting more information, but filtering what actually moves the market
🟡 LTCM turns market noise into structured tradeable views with a thesis, catalyst, entr…
🏛 Crypto industry turns to regulators after CLARITY Act setback
The CLARITY Act failed to advance in the Senate, leaving the US crypto industry without the federal market-structure framework it wanted from Congress.
➡️ What happened
🟡 The Senate vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to move the bill forward
🟡 Democrats raised concerns over ethics rules and President Trump’s crypto-related business interests
➡️ W…
🏛 CLARITY Act faces new pushback before Senate vote
The US crypto market-structure bill is heading into a key Senate vote, but the latest compromise has not removed all opposition. A group of 18 state attorneys general is now urging senators to reject the revised CLARITY Act.
➡️ What happened
🟡 Senate Republicans released updated bill text ahead of the Sept. 15 procedural vote
🟡 The proposal includes tougher ethic…
🏛 US Republicans send final CLARITY Act offer before key vote
Senate Republicans have released a revised CLARITY Act proposal just before a procedural vote that could decide whether the crypto market-structure bill moves forward in the Senate.
➡️ What happened
🟡 The new text is 635 pages and was presented as a final offer to Democrats
🟡 The procedural vote is scheduled for Tuesday, Sept. 15
➡️ Key changes
🟡 The …
🏛 Nasdaq puts $100M into Kraken parent as tokenized stocks gain momentum
Nasdaq has invested $100 million in Payward, the parent company of Kraken, as traditional exchanges move deeper into tokenized assets and always-on trading infrastructure.
➡️ What happened
🟡 Nasdaq’s venture arm invested $100 million in Payward
🟡 The deal reportedly values Kraken’s parent company at $21 billion
➡️ Why it matters
🟡 Kraken wi…
🤫 The market often moves before the headline becomes obvious
In crypto, the biggest advantage is not only watching the chart. It is seeing the signals behind the move: whale activity, market news, closed-community discussions and the setups traders are already tracking.
➡️ What Bull Run follows
🟡 Market news, whale thoughts, tweets and signals that can affect price movement
🟡 Trading ideas built around analysis, t…
🔥 Trading signals are becoming more accessible
The crypto market moves fast, and many traders miss strong setups simply because they see them too late. That is why communities with signals, market insights and ready trading breakdowns are getting more attention now.
➡️ What’s inside
🟡 Trading ideas, market signals and practical strategies from the PROtrading team
🟡 Methods they use to track crypto moves and find p…
🚨 Liquid recovers $270M in Bitcoin after major security incident
Liquid Network has recovered most of the Bitcoin withdrawn during last week’s breach, with the actors returning 3,400 BTC after taking around 4,000 BTC from the federation wallet.
➡️ What happened
🟡 About $320 million worth of Bitcoin was withdrawn from Liquid’s reserves during the incident
🟡 The attackers later returned 3,400 BTC, restoring around 8…
🚨 Liquid loses nearly 4,000 BTC while Bitcoin ETFs post their strongest inflows of 2026
This week brought two very different Bitcoin stories. Liquid Network suffered a major breach involving almost 4,000 BTC, while US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw their best three-week inflow streak of the year.
➡️ Liquid breach
🟡 Nearly 4,000 BTC, worth about $319 million, was taken from Liquid Network
🟡 The sidechain paused bridge nodes…
🎁 $250 for your first position + VIP4 access
A new trading promotion is live for users who want to start trading with extra rewards. Complete the required steps, get a $250 trading voucher and unlock a VIP level for 30 days.
➡️ How to join
🟡 Register, complete KYC and make a qualifying deposit
🟡 Deposit over $250 → $250 voucher + VIP2
🟡 Deposit over $500 → $250 voucher + VIP3
🟡 Deposit over $1,000 → $250 voucher +…
🇹🇭 Thailand tightens crypto transfers with new Travel Rule
Thailand is bringing stricter rules to crypto transfers, including transactions with self-custodial wallets. Digital asset operators will have to identify who is sending and receiving funds, and keep records for years.
➡️ What changed
🟡 Thailand’s SEC adopted new Travel Rule regulations for digital asset operators
🟡 The rules take effect on Feb. 27, 2027, …
😁23🤩21🎉18🔥17❤16👍14
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @crypto_showcase_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@crypto_showcase_en edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Share the latest platform @trjrtjjdfhr · 17,055#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 109,483 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto TV @CryproTV_en · 154,203 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 56,175 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Noob @CryptoNoob_en · 75,763 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
UrgentDrop @UrgentDrop · 56,191 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Crypto Trade Master @cryptotrademaster · 37,796 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 101,180 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
The Analyst CRYPTO @TheAnalystCrypto · 71,010 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Crypto Farmer 🌽 @FarmerCrypto · 45,178 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
SHIBA PAYOUT 🎁 @AirdropSamuel · 444 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
Satoshi Tweeted @satoshi_e · 89,764 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Crypto Penetration blog 🔩 @cryptopenetration · 35,771 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 September 2026
Growth Hacker @gr0wth_hack · 70,756 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
(not)Sad Hamster @notSadHamsters · 68,691 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Aping Den: 100x plays! @apingdegen · 58,491 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Dr Michael Nehls ⋆ @DrMichael_Nehls_0 · 201,708 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Showcase” (@crypto_showcase_en), 57,453 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_showcase_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.