Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@LTCMx was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@cyber_fuzz held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,154. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,787–39,389 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:18
38,050
+78
17 Sept 2026, 07:22
37,972
-40
14 Sept 2026, 10:15
38,012
-49
12 Sept 2026, 16:41
38,061
-65
10 Sept 2026, 12:40
38,126
-99
7 Sept 2026, 10:37
38,225
-95
4 Sept 2026, 12:40
38,320
-59
2 Sept 2026, 20:29
38,379
-21
1 Sept 2026, 21:33
38,400
-34
31 Aug 2026, 19:05
38,434
-54
30 Aug 2026, 15:34
38,488
-30
29 Aug 2026, 16:58
38,518
-16
28 Aug 2026, 15:25
38,534
-40
27 Aug 2026, 17:35
38,574
-30
26 Aug 2026, 16:33
38,604
-31
25 Aug 2026, 16:35
38,635
-35
24 Aug 2026, 14:05
38,670
-62
22 Aug 2026, 20:46
38,732
-43
21 Aug 2026, 13:28
38,775
-31
20 Aug 2026, 11:33
38,806
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 30 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 76 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 38,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,800
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.675%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
24 (30 September 2025 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
23,990
Reactions total
162
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Sept 2026, 11:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 39s
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,382 reactions across 23 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
560
23.5%
👍
306
12.8%
🎉
227
9.53%
🥰
226
9.49%
💯
225
9.45%
🔥
198
8.31%
🤩
191
8.02%
😍
187
7.85%
❤🔥
168
7.05%
🤣
23
0.966%
💩
19
0.798%
😁
18
0.756%
🤬
9
0.378%
🤓
8
0.336%
👏
6
0.252%
🤔
5
0.21%
🎄
3
0.126%
⚡
1
0.042%
🖕
1
0.042%
🤝
1
0.042%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2025 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
RESULTS — JANUARY TO SEPTEMBER
Eleven positions closed. Eleven closed in profit.
Before anyone gets excited, the honest breakdown: seven hit the full published target. Four I closed early - in profit - when the setup stopped working. Small wins instead of stop-outs. That's not a footnote. That's the system.
The numbers:
▪️11 trades — 11 profitable
6 longs / 5 shorts
▪️+11.5% total portfolio return
▪️+9.1% average …
$ORCL — #SHORT
I’m opening another tactical short position in Oracle at $150.28.
▪️Entry: $150.28
▪️Stop Loss: $158.00
▪️Take Profit: $145.00
▪️Price Target: $145.00
▪️Expected Return: +3.65%
▪️Risk: −5.13%
▪️Risk / Reward: 0.71 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 4%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.41%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–2 weeks
THE THESIS
I'm staying short Oracle.
The first part of the trade has already played out, wi…
$ORCL — #SHORT
I’m opening a short position in Oracle at $158.78.
▪️Entry: $158.78
▪️Stop Loss: $168.00
▪️Take Profit: $150.00
▪️Price Target: $150.00
▪️Expected Return: +5.53%
▪️Risk: −5.81%
▪️Risk / Reward: 0.95 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 5%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.58%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–4 weeks
THE THESIS
I'm short Oracle here because I think the market is getting increasingly aggressive in pricing t…
$AMD — #SHORT
I’m opening a tactical short position in AMD at $465.58.
▪️Entry: $465.58
▪️Stop Loss: $480.00
▪️Take Profit: $450.00
▪️Price Target: $450.00
▪️Expected Return: +3.35%
▪️Risk: −3.10%
▪️Risk / Reward: 1.08 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 4%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.62%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–3 weeks
THE THESIS
I'm taking a short-term short position in AMD after an exceptionally strong run.
This isn'…
Life sentence in a mental institution for leaking GTA VI — that's exactly what the previous hacker got in 2023.
⁉️Briefly about the new wave of leaks:
• Nicknames, posts, and messages point to a German — in Germany, cybercrime penalties are severe;
• The hackers don't just have clips — they have a fully playable build. In one video, they even sprayed their nickname on a wall;
• The hackers' ultimatum — Rockstar must…
$PLTR — #LONG
I’m opening a tactical long position in Palantir at $179.01.
▪️Entry: $179.01
▪️Stop Loss: $164.00
▪️Take Profit: $188.00
▪️Price Target: $188.00
▪️Expected Return: +5.02%
▪️Risk: −8.39%
▪️Risk / Reward: 0.60 : 1
▪️Leverage: 1.5×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 4%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.50%
▪️Time Horizon: 2–6 weeks
THE THESIS
This is a very different trade from my earlier PLTR position.
I'm not buying Palanti…
$META — #LONG
I’m opening a long position in Meta at $594.97.
▪️Entry: $594.97
▪️Stop Loss: $555.00
▪️Take Profit: $650.00
▪️Price Target: $650.00
▪️Expected Return: +9.25%
▪️Risk: −6.72%
▪️Risk / Reward: 1.38 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 8%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −1.07%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–3 months
THE THESIS
I’m buying Meta here because the market continues to underestimate how effectively the company has …
📣 Your phone number is probably rented. Degenphone wants to make it ownable.
Most virtual numbers work the same way: you pay, use it for SMS or verifications, then lose it when the subscription ends. Nothing is really yours.
❗️ Degenphone flips this model ❗️
You mint a fresh European number once, use it on 50+ platforms, receive SMS, pass verifications for crypto exchanges, apps, services and other platforms, and …
#partnerpromo
📱 We are looking for an Assistant to a Senior Sales Manager 📱
The company is the largest seller of Telegram ads in the world and an official Telegram partner.
What you'll be doing:
⚫You will be given a list of contacts
⚫You will be required to write to these contacts (via Telegram) and maintain communication
⚫Provide weekly reports
⚫Refine communication scripts
What we offer:
⚫Remote work
⚫Salary …
$ROKU — #LONG
I’m opening a long position in Roku at $84.42.
▪️Entry: $84.42
▪️Stop Loss: $72.00
▪️Take Profit: $120.00
▪️Price Target: $120.00
▪️Expected Return: +42.15%
▪️Risk: −14.71%
▪️Risk / Reward: 2.87 : 1
▪️Leverage: 1.5×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 6%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.88%
▪️Time Horizon: 6–12 months
THE THESIS
I’m taking a long position in Roku because I think the market is still treating the company prima…
$GOOGL — #SHORT
I’m opening a short position in Alphabet at $324.32.
▪️Entry: $324.32
▪️Stop Loss: $342.00
▪️Take Profit: $300.00
▪️Price Target: $300.00
▪️Expected Return: +7.50%
▪️Risk: −5.45%
▪️Risk / Reward: 1.38 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 6%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −0.65%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–3 months
THE THESIS
This is a tactical short on Alphabet, not a statement that I think Google is a bad business.…
$AMD — #SHORT
I’m opening a short position in AMD at $246.27.
▪️Entry: $246.27
▪️Stop Loss: $265.00
▪️Take Profit: $210.00
▪️Price Target: $210.00
▪️Expected Return: +14.73%
▪️Risk: −7.61%
▪️Risk / Reward: 1.94 : 1
▪️Leverage: 2×
▪️Portfolio Allocation: 7%
▪️Portfolio Risk: −1.06%
▪️Time Horizon: 1–3 months
THE THESIS
This is a tactical short, not a long-term bearish view on AMD.
I remain interested in AMD as a st…
🥰36❤25👍15💯10❤🔥7🔥7😍7🎉6
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @LTCMx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tech Paper @TechPaper · 29,220 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
ECONOMY NEWS⚡️ @econ_live · 161,616 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 August 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 101,180 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
The Daily iGaming @DailyiGamingEN · 58,843 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
National lottery Administration /ብሔራዊ ሎተሪ አስተዳደር / @national_lottery · 186,761 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 109,483 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 56,175 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Aping Den: 100x plays! @apingdegen · 58,491 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 22 August 2026
Daily Telegram @daily_telegram · 36,010 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
CryptoMozart's Profit Signals @mr_mozart_en · 33,660 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 3 September 2026
SOL PUMP™ @solpump · 41,044 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 August 2026
Chads’ Meme Alliance: 100X @memetakeovers · 70,002 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LTCM (Long-Term Capital Management)” (@LTCMx), 38,050 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LTCMx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.