Channel
@satoshi_e
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
90,198subscribers
-774 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002218932392 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @satoshi_e |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/satoshi_e |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 90,198 | -72 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 90,270 | -48 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 90,318 | -53 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 90,371 | -48 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 90,419 | -77 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 90,496 | -69 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 90,565 | -61 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 90,626 | -32 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 90,658 | -49 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 90,707 | -45 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 90,752 | -61 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 90,813 | -57 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 90,870 | -80 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 90,950 | -22 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 90,972 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (14 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 167,363 |
| Reactions total | 1,562 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,227 reactions across 28 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 306 | 13.7% | |
| 🔥 | 283 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 268 | 12.0% | |
| 😍 | 250 | 11.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 242 | 10.9% | |
| 🥰 | 231 | 10.4% | |
| 🎉 | 216 | 9.70% | |
| 💯 | 216 | 9.70% | |
| 🤩 | 210 | 9.43% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.09% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.045% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.045% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.045% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,227reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟠 Bitcoin breaks the 200-day line for the first time in 9 months Bitcoin pushed close to $73K and finally reclaimed its 200-day moving average for the first time since November 2025. That matters because this level is one of the cleanest “is the trend still broken?” signals. BTC spent months under it. Now the market is trying to prove the downtrend is losing control. 📊 What it means: — BTC crossed above the 200-da…
❤4
🟠 Bitcoin jumps to $69.7K as Treasury quietly adds liquidity Bitcoin ripped 6% and touched $69,749, its highest level since June 2. The trigger wasn’t some magic crypto narrative. It was liquidity. The US Treasury said it will at least double its debt buyback operations from $2B to $4B per round starting Sept. 9. Bond yields dropped fast, stocks rallied, and BTC finally caught the wave. 📊 What it means: — BTC brok…
❤3
🟠 Bitcoin hits $65K, but the real test is still ahead Bitcoin pushed back to $65K for the first time in a week as US stocks bounced from two-week lows. The trigger was another wave of US-Iran headlines: Trump claimed the Strait of Hormuz is “open and operating,” while oil avoided a major spike. So BTC got relief. But not a clean breakout yet. 📊 What it means: — BTC reached $65K for the first time since Aug. 10. — …
🔥3❤2👍2❤🔥1💯1🤩1😍1😨1
🟠 Bitcoin lost the 200-week line — and 2022 is back in the chat BTC is starting the week near $63K, but the ugly part is the weekly close. Bitcoin closed below its 200-week moving average around $64.2K — the same long-term line that became a major bear-market signal in 2022. The range is still tight: roughly $57.7K to $67.3K. But losing the 200-week level makes the bounce look weaker. 📊 What it means: — BTC failed…
🔥14💯13🥰13👍12❤11😍11🎉9❤🔥8
🟠 Swan CEO says Bitcoin may bottom in October, and altcoins are “basically dead” Swan Bitcoin CEO Cory Klippsten thinks BTC could find its cycle bottom in October, roughly one year after its previous peak above $126K. His downside zone is still ugly: $57K, maybe even $53K, before a recovery. But his bigger take is even sharper: Bitcoin can recover, while most altcoins are no longer real competitors as money. 📊 Wha…
❤15🎉13👍13😍12❤🔥11🥰8💯7🔥6
🟠 Bitcoin stuck near $64K as cool PPI gives markets relief Bitcoin is still moving like it’s waiting for someone else to make the first move. BTC bounced slightly from weekly lows and traded near $63.9K after July PPI came in cooler than expected. The data helped stocks, but Bitcoin didn’t explode. It just avoided another leg down. 📊 What it means: — July PPI stayed at 0.2% month-on-month. — Year-on-year PPI came …
❤5👍2
🟠 El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment turns 5: great for BTC, messy for locals Five years ago, El Salvador made Bitcoin legal tender and became the first real “Bitcoin country.” The pitch was big: bank the unbanked, cut remittance costs, attract investment and prove BTC could work as sovereign money. Five years later, the picture is awkward. Bitcoin got a global stage. Salvadorans got a much weaker everyday result. 📊…
💯11❤🔥9👍8🤩7❤6😍6🥰5🔥4
🟠 Bitcoin slips while retail runs to gold Bitcoin dropped back below $64K and hit a one-week low, while gold stole the spotlight. XAU jumped to $4,435 per ounce, its highest level in nine weeks, as investors moved back into safe-haven mode ahead of US CPI data. The funny part: Bitcoin is still moving with gold on a 90-day basis, but right now gold is getting the love, and BTC is fighting resistance. 📊 What it mean…
😍24👍21🔥19🥰19🎉16❤🔥13💯12❤11
🟠 Strategy sells BTC again — the treasury machine needs cash Strategy sold 1,690 BTC for $108.6M between Aug. 3 and Aug. 9. The money went straight into buying back STRC preferred shares. This is now the company’s fourth disclosed Bitcoin sale of 2026. 📊 What it means: — Strategy has sold 6,948 BTC this year. — It still holds 840,447 BTC. — The latest sale was done at an average price of $64,262 per BTC. — Its tot…
👍25❤21🥰21❤🔥18🔥18🤩14🎉13💯9
🟠 BIP-110 fork stalls after just two blocks The BIP-110 branch is basically stuck. After mandatory signaling began, the enforcing chain mined only two blocks and stopped at block 961,633, while the normal Bitcoin chain kept moving to 961,721. That’s already an 88-block gap. 📊 What it means: — BIP-110 entered mandatory signaling at block 961,632. — Only 51 of the previous 2,016 blocks supported it. — That’s just 2.…
❤13🔥12👍10😍10❤🔥7🎉7💯6🤩6
🟠 MARA mined more Bitcoin — but still lost $611M MARA had its strongest Bitcoin production quarter in over a year, mining 2,422 BTC in Q2. But the result still looked ugly: the company posted a $611.3M net loss. The reason is simple. Mining output went up, but the average Bitcoin price fell 28%, and that hit the value of MARA’s BTC holdings hard. 📊 What it means: — MARA mined 3% more BTC than a year earlier. — Net…
❤15🔥11👍10❤🔥9🎉7💯7🤩7🥰7
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs just pulled in $626M — but fear is still everywhere US spot Bitcoin ETFs started August with three straight days of inflows. On Wednesday alone, they attracted $244.4M, bringing the 3-day total to $626M. BlackRock’s IBIT did most of the work again, pulling in $479M over the same period. 📊 What it means: — ETF demand is finally showing signs of life again. — IBIT remains the main magnet for instituti…
🔥13🤩10👍7❤6❤🔥6😍6🥰5🎉4
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @satoshi_e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Satoshi Tweeted” (@satoshi_e), 90,198 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satoshi_e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.