— Keeping a close eye on crypto news so you don't miss the next 2009
— Read by the Winklevoss twins and Musk, allegedly
— 4E 6F 77 20 79 6F 75 20 6B 6E 6F 77
Any questions: @net_admin_global
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 58 days, net -1,870. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 88,822–91,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Oct 2026, 12:16
89,102
-345
26 Sept 2026, 02:17
89,447
-317
19 Sept 2026, 03:57
89,764
-97
16 Sept 2026, 19:19
89,861
-108
14 Sept 2026, 18:59
89,969
-84
13 Sept 2026, 06:15
90,053
-95
11 Sept 2026, 06:17
90,148
+856
8 Sept 2026, 12:59
89,292
-159
5 Sept 2026, 06:40
89,451
-91
3 Sept 2026, 10:07
89,542
-78
2 Sept 2026, 01:26
89,620
-51
1 Sept 2026, 01:19
89,671
-63
31 Aug 2026, 03:04
89,734
-51
30 Aug 2026, 04:35
89,785
-45
29 Aug 2026, 06:28
89,830
-49
28 Aug 2026, 05:05
89,879
-43
27 Aug 2026, 07:56
89,922
-51
26 Aug 2026, 06:14
89,973
-66
25 Aug 2026, 03:27
90,039
-72
23 Aug 2026, 20:34
90,111
first reading
Engagement
61 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 89,102 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,000
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.547%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 61 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held
61 (14 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total
230,250
Reactions total
1,260
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,030
Videos
≈22
Links
≈597
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
4,313 reactions across 61 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
698
16.2%
🔥
602
14.0%
👍
552
12.8%
🤩
517
12.0%
🎉
505
11.7%
😍
323
7.49%
🥰
302
7.00%
❤🔥
297
6.89%
💯
282
6.54%
😁
226
5.24%
👏
2
0.046%
🤔
2
0.046%
😢
1
0.023%
😨
1
0.023%
😭
1
0.023%
🤝
1
0.023%
🤯
1
0.023%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟠 Bitcoin is back under $86K — one year after its ATH
Bitcoin is trading around $85.5K, almost exactly one year after hitting its $126K all-time high on Oct. 6, 2025. That puts BTC roughly 32% below the record, while US spot Bitcoin ETFs just flipped back to outflows with $89.9M leaving on Monday.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs lost $89.9M after two days of inflows.
— The funds had added around $293M over the firs…
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs keep winning while Ether funds lose momentum
Bitcoin ETFs just printed a third straight week of inflows, adding another $241.1M while BTC traded near $86.2K. The number is smaller than the previous monster week, but the direction still matters: Bitcoin funds are staying green while Ether and Zcash products have already flipped back into outflows.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs attracted $241.1M last…
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs opened Uptober green — but ETH funds are leaking
Bitcoin ETFs started October with $102.7M in net inflows, flipping back positive right after a red day and after their strongest quarter of 2026. BTC traded near $85.9K, up 2.1% on the day, while Ether ETFs moved the other way and posted their third straight day of outflows.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs pulled in $102.7M on the first trading day of …
🟠 Crypto feels crowded. Stocks are starting to look interesting again.
Everyone has already heard the same crypto story a hundred times: Bitcoin targets, altcoin rotations, futures setups, liquidations, entries, exits. But while most traders keep staring at the same coins, another market is quietly getting attention again — stocks.
📊 What it means:
— Stock trading is becoming one of the cleaner plays into the end o…
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs pulled $6.3B in Q3 — and BTC had its best Q3 since 2017
Bitcoin just closed a monster quarter: BTC gained 42.71% in Q3, while US spot Bitcoin ETFs attracted $6.34B in net inflows. That is not just a rebound from a weak first half — it is the kind of flow reversal that can change the market’s mood fast.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs saw $6.34B in Q3 inflows.
— That was their strongest quarter of 202…
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs are still pulling money while altcoin funds start blinking
Bitcoin ETFs extended their inflow streak to nine trading days, adding another $66.2M on Tuesday and pushing the full streak to roughly $3.1B. BTC itself is not exploding yet — it traded near $83.5K and barely moved on the day — but the ETF flow is still doing the important work in the background.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs have now seen…
🟠 Bitcoin survived the bond-market punch — but profit-taking is getting louder
Bitcoin bounced back toward $84K after refusing to break below $82.5K, even as the US 30-year bond yield hit 5.58% — its highest level since 2002. That is not a small backdrop: yields are screaming stress, oil and war headlines are still hanging over risk assets, and BTC is now sitting on a level analysts call trend-defining.
📊 What it m…
🟠 Bitcoin ETFs took in $2.4B — but BTC still pulled back
Bitcoin ETFs just printed their strongest inflow week of 2026, pulling in $2.39B after another $134.5M arrived on Friday. That is the biggest weekly inflow since October 2025 — but the interesting part is that BTC still slipped from above $87.1K to around $83.1K, showing that ETF demand is strong, but not strong enough yet to erase every sell-off.
📊 What it m…
🟠 Bitcoin is fighting $84K while the bond market turns hostile
Bitcoin slipped to around $83.2K after the US 10-year Treasury yield hit its highest level since 2007. That matters because when government debt starts offering higher returns, risk assets feel the pressure — and BTC is now trying to hold its ground while rate-hike odds, oil prices and the dollar all move against it.
📊 What it means:
— BTC fell below $8…
🟠 Bitcoin is close to $90K — and that’s where sellers may wake up
Bitcoin is trading near $86K, and CryptoQuant says the path toward $90K looks open after BTC reclaimed its 365-day moving average. But the same zone may become the first serious test of the new bull move: short-term traders are already sitting on big unrealized profits, and $88K–90K is where many of them may start locking gains.
📊 What it means:
— Cr…
🟠 Bitcoin started the move. Altcoins are trying to steal it.
Bitcoin pushed toward $86K and helped the total crypto market reclaim $3T, but the more interesting signal is happening under the surface: Glassnode’s Altcoin Cycle Signal just flipped into altseason territory. BTC is still strong, but its dominance is stuck below 60%, and capital is starting to spread wider.
📊 What it means:
— Glassnode’s Altcoin Cycle S…
🟠 Nearly $1B just rushed into Bitcoin ETFs in one day
US spot Bitcoin ETFs pulled in $998.9M on Monday, their biggest daily inflow of 2026 and the strongest day since October 2025. Bitcoin reacted immediately: BTC briefly pushed above $87.2K, and the market got the kind of institutional flow that can turn a breakout from “nice move” into something much harder to ignore.
📊 What it means:
— Bitcoin ETFs almost hit $1…
🤩9❤6👍6😁6🔥5🎉4
Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @satoshi_e. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 54,788 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 108,090 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
UrgentDrop @UrgentDrop · 55,654 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 99,919 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Farmer 🌽 @FarmerCrypto · 44,732 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Crypto Showcase @crypto_showcase_en · 56,820 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 August 2026
Growth Hacker @gr0wth_hack · 70,165 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Noob @CryptoNoob_en · 74,972 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026
(not)Sad Hamster @notSadHamsters · 67,410 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 August 2026
Chads’ Meme Alliance: 100X @memetakeovers · 68,284 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Satoshi Tweeted” (@satoshi_e), 89,102 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satoshi_e.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.