Michael Saylor’s Strategy Buys Another 950 BTC Strategy acquired another 950 BTC for $80.5M at an average price of about $79,670. The company now holds 846,000 BTC worth around $71.7B. 📺Crypto TV📺
❤9🔥9🎉7😁6👍5🤩3

Channel
@CryproTV_en
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
154,203subscribers
-5,119 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001265651537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CryproTV_en |
| Description | Unparalleled, unbiased & real-time coverage of latest market insights Crypto, finance and tech Any questions: @net_admin_global |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CryproTV_en |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 154,203 | -249 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 154,452 | -228 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 154,680 | -260 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 154,940 | +412 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 154,528 | -164 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 154,692 | -335 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 155,027 | -215 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 155,242 | -182 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:43 | 155,424 | -189 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 155,613 | -149 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 155,762 | -169 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 155,931 | -183 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 156,114 | -115 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 156,229 | -120 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 156,349 | -136 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:09 | 156,485 | -167 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 156,652 | -273 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 156,925 | -221 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 157,146 | -149 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 157,295 | first reading |
139 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 96 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (30 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 700,100 |
| Reactions total | 3,724 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 08:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
7,873 reactions across 139 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,381 | 17.5% | |
| 👍 | 945 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 932 | 11.8% | |
| 🎉 | 926 | 11.8% | |
| 🤩 | 908 | 11.5% | |
| 😍 | 603 | 7.66% | |
| 💯 | 595 | 7.56% | |
| ❤🔥 | 583 | 7.41% | |
| 🥰 | 579 | 7.35% | |
| 😁 | 332 | 4.22% | |
| 🤡 | 18 | 0.229% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 0.114% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 0.089% | |
| 🤗 | 7 | 0.089% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 0.076% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 0.076% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 0.064% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 0.064% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.051% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.051% | |
| 12 further kinds | 18 | 0.229% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 139 of the 139 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,873 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 139 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Michael Saylor’s Strategy Buys Another 950 BTC Strategy acquired another 950 BTC for $80.5M at an average price of about $79,670. The company now holds 846,000 BTC worth around $71.7B. 📺Crypto TV📺
❤9🔥9🎉7😁6👍5🤩3
Bitcoin Flashes Potential Bull Market Signal Bitcoin closed a week above its 50-week moving average for the first time in 45 weeks. Galaxy Digital research head Alex Thorn says that historically, BTC’s first move back above the 50W MA during a bear market has often confirmed that the cycle bottom was already in. 📺Crypto TV📺
🤩8🎉7😁6👍5🔥5❤4
Trump Announces “AI Force” And New AI Czar Role Donald Trump says the US will create an “AI Force” modeled after the Space Force and appoint a new “AI czar” to oversee the sector. Trump said his administration does not want to slow AI development, called it the next industrial revolution and claimed the industry could eventually account for as much as 25% of US GDP. 📺Crypto TV📺
👍10❤8🔥7🎉5😁5🤩3
CFTC Begins Preparing Its Own Crypto Market Rules The CFTC has sent a crypto market regulation initiative to the White House for review. The proposal is still at an early stage and its details remain undisclosed, as the CFTC and SEC move to develop their own crypto rules amid delays around the CLARITY Act. 📺Crypto TV📺
😁8🔥7🤩7❤6👍4🎉3
Cronos Proposes Using 100% Of Revenue For CRO Buybacks And Burns Cronos is proposing to direct all revenue from Ult and Cronos Launch toward buying CRO on the open market and permanently burning the tokens. Staking rewards would instead be funded from the Cronos strategic reserve, but the proposal still needs community approval. 📺Crypto TV📺
🔥9🤩9❤5👍4🎉3😁3
ZetaChain To Shut Down And Move ZETA To Solana ZetaChain’s community approved a proposal to retire the Layer 1 network and migrate ZETA to Solana. ZETA will become a native SPL token without changes to tokenomics, and once migration is complete, the ZetaChain blockchain will shut down while Solana becomes the token’s primary network. 📺Crypto TV📺
😁7🎉6👍6🔥6🤩5❤4
NYSE Considers Avalanche For 24/7 Blockchain Trading The New York Stock Exchange is developing its own alternative trading system that could enable 24/7 asset trading with blockchain-based settlement. ICE, NYSE’s parent company, says Avalanche meets many of the technical requirements being considered, although no final blockchain choice has been confirmed. 📺Crypto TV📺
❤14🔥12😁5🎉4👍3🤩3
WSJ: ECB Chief Helped Block Binance’s EU License WSJ reports that ECB President Christine Lagarde helped block Binance’s MiCA license in Greece, asking the Greek prime minister not to approve the application shortly before the exchange expected approval. Concerns reportedly included protection of the digital euro, the growing role of dollar stablecoins in Europe and Binance’s past AML violations in the US, after whi…
❤11🔥9🤩6😁6🎉2👍1
The Real Edge Is Filtering Market Noise Markets are not short on information anymore — they are drowning in it. LTCM filters earnings, macro data, Fed headlines, analyst revisions and positioning into tradeable views with a thesis, catalyst, entry, risk and a clear point where the idea stops working. 👉 https://t.me/LTCMx 📺Crypto TV📺
😁12👍10🔥6❤5🤩4🎉3
Balancer Faces Closure Risk After Failed Restructuring Balancer is reportedly close to shutting down after a failed restructuring, with the protocol generating only around $30,000 per month while expenses remain near $150,000. At least $9M from the treasury is now being proposed for distribution to BAL holders. 📺Crypto TV📺
❤12🤩9😁7👍4🔥3🎉2
CLARITY Act Fails Key Senate Vote The US Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act after the bill did not reach the 60 votes needed to move forward. The setback delays consideration of the crypto market structure bill, while Bitcoin and crypto-related stocks fell after the vote. 📺Crypto TV📺
🔥8❤7👍6🎉5🤩5😁5🥴1
X Launches Cashtag Trading Links For Stocks And Crypto X has launched a new Cashtag feature for stocks and cryptocurrencies in the US. Tapping a ticker now opens a price chart, related posts and a Trade button that redirects users to partners such as Interactive Brokers, Moomoo, Gemini, Kraken and Coinbase. 📺Crypto TV📺
❤8👍8🔥8🎉5😁4🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @CryproTV_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@CryproTV_en edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
5 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto TV” (@CryproTV_en), 154,203 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryproTV_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.