Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 9 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 July 2024 to 13 March 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dogs. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net +5,292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87,324–94,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 10:39
93,431
-56
15 Sept 2026, 09:16
93,487
-47
13 Sept 2026, 18:01
93,534
-39
11 Sept 2026, 21:01
93,573
+98
9 Sept 2026, 11:17
93,475
+308
6 Sept 2026, 06:58
93,167
+389
3 Sept 2026, 23:01
92,778
+138
2 Sept 2026, 12:04
92,640
+57
1 Sept 2026, 12:03
92,583
+122
31 Aug 2026, 11:13
92,461
+55
30 Aug 2026, 08:58
92,406
+101
29 Aug 2026, 05:59
92,305
+110
28 Aug 2026, 03:12
92,195
+34
27 Aug 2026, 05:08
92,161
+25
26 Aug 2026, 06:03
92,136
+92
25 Aug 2026, 06:47
92,044
+168
24 Aug 2026, 05:47
91,876
+177
22 Aug 2026, 13:44
91,699
+190
21 Aug 2026, 00:42
91,509
+378
19 Aug 2026, 21:23
91,131
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
17
Videos
1
Links
14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
🚀 Hey Dogs!
We’re excited to introduce Dogs Miner – a brand-new way to earn DOGS using your phone’s power!🤑
😎Start mining today and watch your DOGS grow!
🦴Invite friends and mine together for even bigger rewards!
Join the pack now and be among the first to build your DOGS fortune! 🐶
🐈⬛ CATS has announced a slight delay in the listing date, which will be confirmed in the next couple of weeks.
This gives users more time to earn coins and boost their airdrop rewards before the official listing! 🔥
🔗 CATS_GANG
DOGS Airdrop is melting TON infrastructure 🐶
We understand that some people are still waiting for their on-chain claim to arrive.
Rest assured, all TON and Telegram Wallet teams are working hard to make it happen 🦴
Please be patient—everyone will receive their airdrop! 🐶
🐶
Official $DOGS listing starts in 35 mins, at 12:00pm UTC today
Binance
Bybit
OKX
Bitget
Gate
You could also exchange your $DOGS in @Wallet, Ston.fi or Dedust.io
Make sure you don't buy $DOGS in other places before 12:00pm UTC. Stay safe.
Hey Dogs,
Telegram is our home. This is where we build, communicate, and find our community.
We love this place, just as it is.
We stand with privacy and truth. We stand with Pavel and Telegram, in both good times and hard times.
We didn’t want to make it symbolic, but we are sticking to our line. And our pack.
Tomorrow, 26th of August, at 12:00 pm UTC, you will see the Telegram $DOGS on all major exchanges.
Sta…
We’re thrilled to announce that $DOGS will be listed on ByBit for Spot Trading! 🟠🐶
Check out the official announcement here: ByBit Spot Listing 🥷
OPEN THE BOT 🤖
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @dogs_community_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Crypto Arbitrage @crypto7arbitrage · 41,179 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 4 September 2026
Dragon Money @DragonMoneyChannel · 34,915 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 2 September 2026
Crypto Aunt @milfz_crypto · 108,947 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto News @crypto_news778 · 81,646 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
SquawkSwap Official 🦜 @squawkswapofficial · 21,687 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 24 September 2026
Daily Telegram @daily_telegram · 35,761 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
Crypto Monarch @cryptoomonarch · 235,872 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 August 2026
Sin Unicorn 🦄 @sinunicorn · 101,180 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026
Prog Coin @progcoinofficial · 101,412 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 August 2026
Криптота @degenmur · 21,992 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 21 September 2026
Rich Dog: Top Play to Earn Platform @RichDogGame · 1,249,046 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Expert @Crypto_experti · 137,804 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 August 2026
All About TON @all_aboutTon · 149,364 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
SHIBA PAYOUT 🎁 @AirdropSamuel · 444 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 25 August 2026
UrgentDrop @UrgentDrop · 56,191 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Tonhub @tonhub · 84,797 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Maria about TON @mariaabout_ton · 82,338 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
Crypto Trade Master @cryptotrademaster · 37,796 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
TON Insider @TON_ins · 115,441 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
DeDust.io – TON DEX @dedust_en · 67,919 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Guru - Crypto News @snakesignal · 36,613 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 1 September 2026
Clawfoot Capone Official 🐾 @clawfootCapone · 25,122 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
Ecom: The Future. AI, Innovation @ecommerce_AI · 55,616 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dogs Community” (@dogs_community_1), 93,431 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dogs_community_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.