Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹

Channel

Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹

@rosecryptochannelpremium

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,569subscribers

-247 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001274714505
TypeChannel
Username@rosecryptochannelpremium
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rosecryptochannelpremium

Growth

14,56914,81614,692.57 August 2026 — 14,816 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,816 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,812 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,802 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,788 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,778 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,776 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,771 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,753 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,747 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,731 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,728 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,722 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,713 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,709 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,701 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,699 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,696 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,684 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,680 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,678 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,672 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,661 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,649 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,645 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,635 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,617 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,601 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,569 subscribers7 August 20268 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 33 days, net -247. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,532–14,853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 18:1614,569-32
5 Sept 2026, 13:0014,601-16
3 Sept 2026, 16:5614,617-18
2 Sept 2026, 12:5414,635-10
1 Sept 2026, 15:5614,645-4
31 Aug 2026, 14:5614,649-12
30 Aug 2026, 15:3614,661-11
29 Aug 2026, 19:0414,672-6
28 Aug 2026, 18:5314,678-2
27 Aug 2026, 21:2814,680-4
27 Aug 2026, 00:2514,684-12
25 Aug 2026, 20:5714,696-3
24 Aug 2026, 17:4414,699-2
23 Aug 2026, 05:3714,701-8
21 Aug 2026, 18:3714,709-4
20 Aug 2026, 18:5214,713-9
19 Aug 2026, 20:1314,722-6
18 Aug 2026, 20:5814,728-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:0414,731-16
16 Aug 2026, 22:0314,747first reading

Engagement

685 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.33%
avg views ÷ 14,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
529 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
529
of 685 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held685 (6 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total179,194
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 18:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC404 viewsread 2 September 2026

hey guys our bigcaps setups worked perfectly after 2 weeks. What is next

2 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC398 viewsread 2 September 2026

Many accidental meme millionaires have emerged over the past three weeks. Do you think this makes sense? BTC and ETH will be cut in half.

Showing the 12 most recent of 685 posts we hold for @rosecryptochannelpremium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll82 voters

Which will come first ?

  1. BTC 100k$40%
  2. ZEC 1000$34%
  3. HYPE 100$33%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 685 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 97,399
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Rose Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@CryptoRoseChannell · 101,532
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,750
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 28,225
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Crypto Signals
@CryptoShitcoinsignals · 36,228
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 1 September 2026
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 47,601
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹” (@rosecryptochannelpremium), 14,569 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rosecryptochannelpremium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.