Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Profit Vip 🚀

Channel

Dr. Profit Vip 🚀

@drprofitcryptosignal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,815subscribers

-2,932 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002130597094
TypeChannel
Username@drprofitcryptosignal
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held52
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/drprofitcryptosignal

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

20,81523,74722,28116 August 2026 — 23,747 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,641 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,538 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,503 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,496 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,491 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,499 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,485 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,482 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,463 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,454 subscribers28 August 2026 — 23,442 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,346 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,274 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,241 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,214 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,165 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23,105 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,077 subscribers7 September 2026 — 22,930 subscribers10 September 2026 — 22,849 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,742 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,612 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,460 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,431 subscribers30 September 2026 — 21,735 subscribers5 October 2026 — 21,573 subscribers9 October 2026 — 21,427 subscribers13 October 2026 — 21,393 subscribers15 October 2026 — 21,347 subscribers16 October 2026 — 21,307 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,304 subscribers17 October 2026 — 21,294 subscribers18 October 2026 — 21,281 subscribers19 October 2026 — 21,267 subscribers20 October 2026 — 21,247 subscribers22 October 2026 — 21,240 subscribers23 October 2026 — 21,228 subscribers24 October 2026 — 21,213 subscribers25 October 2026 — 21,207 subscribers26 October 2026 — 21,198 subscribers27 October 2026 — 21,173 subscribers28 October 2026 — 21,155 subscribers29 October 2026 — 21,137 subscribers30 October 2026 — 21,116 subscribers31 October 2026 — 21,080 subscribers1 November 2026 — 21,070 subscribers2 November 2026 — 21,056 subscribers3 November 2026 — 21,013 subscribers4 November 2026 — 20,959 subscribers5 November 2026 — 20,874 subscribers6 November 2026 — 20,815 subscribers16 August 20266 November 2026
52 measurements spanning 83 days, net -2,932. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,375–24,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 52
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 21:0520,815-59
5 Nov 2026, 19:2920,874-85
4 Nov 2026, 18:2120,959-54
3 Nov 2026, 15:0621,013-43
2 Nov 2026, 12:0921,056-14
1 Nov 2026, 08:3521,070-10
31 Oct 2026, 08:0921,080-36
30 Oct 2026, 08:0721,116-21
29 Oct 2026, 10:5921,137-18
28 Oct 2026, 07:0021,155-18
27 Oct 2026, 03:5121,173-25
26 Oct 2026, 03:4821,198-9
25 Oct 2026, 00:4521,207-6
24 Oct 2026, 02:3821,213-15
23 Oct 2026, 01:0821,228-12
22 Oct 2026, 01:1821,240-7
20 Oct 2026, 18:4921,247-20
19 Oct 2026, 20:2721,267-14
18 Oct 2026, 23:2921,281-13
17 Oct 2026, 22:5621,294first reading

Engagement

319 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 20,815 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.514%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
96
of 319 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 85 of 96 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held319 (10 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total271,850
Reactions total1,233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,179 reactions across 286 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,17737.0%
🔥46314.6%
👍32910.3%
🤡2919.15%
🤣2578.08%
😁1775.57%
👎1113.49%
👏1033.24%
💯361.13%
💩341.07%
🥰160.503%
🐳150.472%
🤪130.409%
🤔120.377%
🤷‍♂110.346%
😐90.283%
🙏90.283%
🫡90.283%
🖕80.252%
🤝80.252%
30 further kinds912.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 291 of the 319 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 319 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 96 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC≈1,040 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Even with the current DOWNSIDE BTC up 25% since spot entry ETH up 20% since spot entry CRCL up 12% since spot entry COIN down 11% since spot entry The Galactic four are very Galactic it seems @DoctorProfit_Crypto

🤡15👎8❤3😁1

6 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC≈1,270 views20 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

$BTC: Good luck 🍀 @DoctorProfit_Crypto

🤡10😁4❤3👎2👏1

6 Nov 2026, 00:57 UTC823 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Stock Market is on fire 🔥 @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤1🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 00:39 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Crypto is 100% CBDC And everyone who thinks crypto is freedom is a retard. @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤1👍1

6 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC≈1,190 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Unfortunately you are a low IQ BTC is offline while your digital banking is online , connected with several data centers and back up data centers. In case of the absolute worst case, the banking could be erased (Depends where you live). So , you can beg the bank to give you back your $10 , and then you need to proof the bank that you had $10, and in the end the people’s money is gone I mean, the AI stole it, so wh…

❤3👍1

6 Nov 2026, 00:26 UTC≈1,110 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

All of X getting out of control now Yes, good luck with a ‘Radio’ The CBDC is coming wether you like it or not. You will have to use it wether you like it or not. It’s starting , we are in transition phase. #BTC #ETH #CRCL #COIN @DoctorProfit_Crypto

👍2❤1

6 Nov 2026, 00:05 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

The world will seek digital DOLLARs on their own. The world is replacing the old system into the new tokenized system Unfortunately, few understand the generational wealth behind this, and only get distracted on the short term noise @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤2👍1

6 Nov 2026, 00:03 UTC≈1,210 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

The Solution is the OFFLINE treasury , it’s called Bitcoin. While world wide banks and exchanges can become victims of Hacks, Offline Money won’t @DoctorProfit_Crypto

👍2❤1

6 Nov 2026, 00:01 UTC≈1,200 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Unfortunately many have no idea how serious the situation might become Let me ask you a simple question What will you do in case of a global blackout ? Or even worse, a blackout combined with a world wide cyber attack ? @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 23:29 UTC≈1,250 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#BTC #ETH #CRCL #COIN Preparing more liquidity to add @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤6

5 Nov 2026, 23:28 UTC≈1,170 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

I’m planning to realize some giant short position profits on several AI stocks shared in premium only and buy more Bitcoin in the coming days @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤2

5 Nov 2026, 23:26 UTC≈1,200 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026

I keep buying $BTC and holding the shorts on the stock market. Sooner or later people will understand why it’s better to stay bullish on Bitcoin, and bearish on stocks. @DoctorProfit_Crypto

❤8

Showing the 12 most recent of 319 posts we hold for @drprofitcryptosignal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTCAnonymous Poll498 voters

For the next 30 Days

  1. Bullish69%
  2. Bearish33%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 319 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

AltSignals VIP
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,738
#1
CRYPTO AMAN VIP
@aman_crypto_signals · 6,584
#2
Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,935
#3
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,226
#4
Always Win Premium
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,296
#5
CryptoHolic©
@CryptoHolicss · 5,068
#6
the bitcoin diner
@thebitcoindiner · 14,843
#7
USA News
@USANewsTg · 8,372
#8
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,334
#9
Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰
@DenmarkSnipers · 14,784
#10
Master of Binance - By Banana Bot
@Master_of_binanace · 10,718
#11
Inner Circle VIP FREE
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,537
#12
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,458
#13
Crypto AMAN VIP Freemium
@cryptoamanvipfreemium · 3,828
#14
King Signals ®
@kingsignalsx · 3,328
#15
Crypto Musk
@crypto_musk1 · 81,515
#16
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 181,363
#17
Binance Spot & FutuRes Signals 🐋
@next10xgem1 · 321,650
#18
Binance 360
@binance_360 · 100,936
#19
Cash Haters 💰
@Cash_Haters · 7,217
#20
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 295,221
#21
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,345
#22
Wolfx Signals Vip
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,692
#23
Rose Crypto Challenge - 0.1BTC to 100BTC🌹
@cryptorosechannelll · 5,791
#24
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,612
#25
Crypto Sharks®
@CryptoSharksTelegram · 16,492
#26
Wolf of Trading® - ViP
@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP · 6,446
#27
Blockchain Clowns
@BlockchainClowns · 4,963
#28
Blue Bison Crypto®
@BlueBisonCrypto · 5,046
#29
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 25,590
#30
Crypto King
@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis · 5,264
#31
Token Hunters | TH
@TokenHunters_TH · 5,134
#32
Rose Vip Signal | 1 BTC -> 100 BTC
@rosecryptochannelsignals · 9,457
#33
Bitcoin Assassins©
@BitcoinAssassins · 15,081
#34
Rose Signals - 0.1 BTC to 100 BTC 🌹
@rosecryptochannelpremium · 14,135
#35
Rose Crypto Signals | Official Channel
@RoseSignals_Premium · 10,767
#36
Crypto News
@CryptoNewsBroadcast · 2,491
#37
Top Crypto News
@TopCryptoNewsTg · 15,070
#38
Bitcoin News
@BitcoinWorldwideNews · 3,020
#39
Financial News
@FinancialNewsTg · 15,856
#40
#Bitcoin Radar
@Radar_Bitcoin · 7,360
#41
Bitcoin Magazine
@BitcoinMagazineTelegram · 9,801
#42
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,631
#43
Binance Liquidations
@cryptoliquidations · 3,362
#44
Watcher Guru
@WatcherGuru · 631,925
#45
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 149,521
#46
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋
@BCUSAReal · 145,340
#47
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,029
#48
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 235,247
#49
A.R.S. CRYPTO | FOREX™
@arscryptocalls7 · 126,818
#50
Donald Trump 🇺🇸
@realdonaldtrumpchannel · 2,296
#51
World of Statistics
@worldofstatstg · 2,680
#52
BRICS News
@BRICSNewspaper · 9,381
#53
Humans No Context
@outofcontexthumans · 1,869
#54
Crypto Market Sentiment
@MarketSentimentCrypto · 2,431
#55
Whale Alerts
@whale_alert_channel · 2,091
#56

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Doctor Profit VIP 🇨🇭
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,935
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
🧧 Rose Premium Signal 🌹
@RoseSignalsPremium · 94,109
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 25,590
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Binance Pumps®
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,612
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,575
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Profit Vip 🚀” (@drprofitcryptosignal), 20,815 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drprofitcryptosignal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.