Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto King

Channel

Crypto King

@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,478subscribers

-178 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001276866804
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoKingMarketAnalysis

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@TheLionKingOfCharts/763323 May 2026, 08:50 UTC@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1062 · this entry23 May 2026, 08:50 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1063 · this entry24 May 2026, 08:26 UTC@TheLionKingOfCharts/763624 May 2026, 08:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@TheLionKingOfCharts/763925 May 2026, 09:42 UTC@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1064 · this entry25 May 2026, 09:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1065 · this entry26 May 2026, 09:49 UTC@TheLionKingOfCharts/764226 May 2026, 09:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@TheLionKingOfCharts/764527 May 2026, 08:41 UTC@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1066 · this entry27 May 2026, 08:41 UTC1.00under a minute
@TheLionKingOfCharts/764828 May 2026, 08:24 UTC@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis/1067 · this entry28 May 2026, 08:24 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@TheLionKingOfCharts6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minuteeven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 9 May 2026 to 28 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @CryptoHolicss. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,4785,6565,5677 August 2026 — 5,656 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,656 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,641 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,639 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,630 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,605 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,596 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,580 subscribers2 September 2026 — 5,559 subscribers6 September 2026 — 5,532 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,513 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,501 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,478 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -178. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,451–5,683 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 22:375,478-23
14 Sept 2026, 13:395,501-12
11 Sept 2026, 02:165,513-19
6 Sept 2026, 13:575,532-27
2 Sept 2026, 07:435,559-21
29 Aug 2026, 23:575,580-16
27 Aug 2026, 05:055,596-9
21 Aug 2026, 00:365,605-25
17 Aug 2026, 16:355,630-9
14 Aug 2026, 03:055,639-2
10 Aug 2026, 12:105,641-15
7 Aug 2026, 13:585,656no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:025,656first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 08:24 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Fida Bonfida is testing the midline of the descending channel on the weekly chart👀 Rising buying interest at this zone suggests a potential breakout💁‍♂️ If the trend continues, we could see the price climb toward $0.66📈

27 May 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Arb Arbitrum is retesting the support zone inside the descending channel on the 3D chart💁‍♂️ This support zone is attracting steady buying interest from market participants🔍 A bounce could launch the price toward $0.93📈

26 May 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Dusk Dusk Network is trading within the descending channel pattern on the weekly chart💁‍♂️ Consolidation looks complete; breakout potential is rising👨‍💻 The multi-week rally could reach $1.10📈

25 May 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Alt AltLayer is moving inside the falling wedge on the 3D chart👀 A long accumulation phase is nearing its end, and breakout pressure is rising🤔 The midterm rally could target $0.19✈️

24 May 2026, 08:26 UTC684 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Dogs is consolidating above the descending channel formation on the 3D timeframe👨‍💻 If momentum continues, we could see a climb toward $0.0013✈️

23 May 2026, 08:50 UTC580 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Rare SuperRare is consolidating within the falling wedge on the 3D chart👀 Traders seem to be getting ready for another leg up🔥 If the pattern plays out, we could see a rally that pushes the price toward $0.096🐃

22 May 2026, 08:46 UTC520 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Aixbt has broken above the falling wedge formation on the 3D chart🔥 The pattern breakout indicates that bears have lost control of price action🔍 A sustained move could target $0.24🐃

20 May 2026, 09:53 UTC504 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Pha Phala Network is currently testing the upper border of the falling wedge formation on the 3D timeframe👀 A decisive move above resistance could trigger a powerful upward surge🔥 If confirmed, we might see the price surge toward $0.25📈

19 May 2026, 08:44 UTC462 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Ai is breaking above the midline of the descending channel pattern on the 3D chart👀 A continuation could launch the price toward $0.80🚀

18 May 2026, 09:16 UTC445 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Ont Ontology is about to bounce off the midline of the descending channel pattern on the 3D timeframe👨‍💻 A successful bounce could lead to movement toward $0.27🐃

17 May 2026, 09:17 UTC413 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#Celr Celer Network is currently challenging the upper border of the descending channel on the 3D timeframe💁‍♂️ The price is facing rejection from the top of the range, but the setup remains bullish👀 A strong move above resistance could propel the price toward $0.015✈️

16 May 2026, 09:49 UTC367 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#1Inch 1inch Network is consolidating near the support zone inside the descending channel formation on the 3D chart👨‍💻 The price structure indicates potential for upward movement from here🤔 A successful bounce might propel the price toward $0.39🚀

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CryptoKingMarketAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,858
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 28,038
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
𝐊𝐎𝐁𝐑𝐀 𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎
@KobraCrypto · 126,621
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 September 2026
Binance Killers® VIP Signals
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 47,338
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto King” (@CryptoKingMarketAnalysis), 5,478 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoKingMarketAnalysis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.