Channel
@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,581subscribers
-172 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002241298120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @wolfoftrading/631126 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2262 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wolfoftrading/631427 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2265 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 16:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wolfoftrading/631627 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2267 · this entry27 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wolfoftrading/631930 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2270 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 08:56 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wolfoftrading/632131 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2272 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @wolfoftrading/63233 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC | @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP/2274 · this entry3 Aug 2026, 19:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @wolfoftrading | 11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @wolfoftrading (11–0) |
| @SpaceX_Signals | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | under a minute | @SpaceX_Signals (5–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 16 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @wolfoftrading. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 6,581 | -14 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:42 | 6,595 | -16 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:00 | 6,611 | -23 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 6,634 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:23 | 6,653 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 6,668 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 6,683 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 6,690 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 6,696 | -9 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 6,705 | -18 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 6,723 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 6,738 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 6,749 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 6,753 | first reading |
45 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 45 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
$BNBUSDT Update: 1h Breaking from above of the downtrend, if we manage to hold on the bullish momentum, we could be expecting for $BNB to be rising up higher than this. Just so you know that, as long as BNB is above of $600 psychological support, it's bullish on the short term, and the mid-term timeframe.
$APTUSDT Update: 1h It's about time for APT to start following our prediction, expecting to see a large move to the upside. 💹🚀
2026 YTD is wild 👀 🛢 Brent +42.7% 📈 Nasdaq +14.5% 📈 S&P 500 +13.3% 🥇 Gold -1.5% ₿ Bitcoin -29.0% Ξ Ethereum -37.4% Crypto clearly missed the party so far.
$APTUSDT Update: 1h What a well respected trendline for APTUSDT, once we have a break-out from above of it, surely it will go for a massive pump.
$BNBUSDT Update: 1h Just like we have told you, BNB was mainly bullish, and it went to the upside as predicted. Right now we are currently retesting the trendline as predicted, and if we hold above we are going to be pushing up higher. $800 - $1,000 is on the line. 💹 If we break the trendline, we will go for a short term correction
Any dips down to $53,000 are absolute buys
OVERALL MARKET UPDATE (Important) USDT.D Chart #4h Timeframe Broken from above of the hidden downtrend, retested, and now going for reversal back to the upside. Expecting for it to be pushing up to new highs, which means that USDT.D is bullish, and the market is bearish.
$BTCUSDT Update: 1h Currently moving sideways, and moving inside of a hidden falling wedge pattern. Expecting to see some small longs here.
🚨THIS WEEK WAS SUPPOSED TO BE BIG FOR CRYPTO 🇺🇸 The CLARITY Act has been delayed. And the SEC’s open meeting scheduled for this week has also been canceled. Two major Crypto events pushed off the calendar 👀
Metaplanet moved 3,881 $BTC worth $247.3M in the past three hours, per Arkham data
🇺🇸🇺🇸 *US JULY CONSUMER PRICES RISE 0.1% M/M; EST. +0.1% *US JULY CONSUMER PRICES RISE 3.4% Y/Y; EST. +3.4% *US JULY CORE CPI RISES 0.2% M/M; EST. +0.2% *US JULY CORE CPI RISES 2.5% Y/Y; EST. +2.5%
🇺🇸 57 days of pressure from US players. Bitcoin’s Coinbase Premium has now been consistently negative for ~57 days — its longest stretch yet. BTC trading cheaper on Coinbase vs. Binance suggests sustained selling from larger US players.
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wolf of Trading® - ViP” (@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP), 6,581 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.