Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Binance signals
@binance_futures
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,777subscribers
-2,581 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001673124233 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @binance_futures |
| Description | Dm us to join VIP, totally free of cost Contact - @traderjacob Sign up to get deposit bonus and airdrops - https://bingx.com/invite/XJKYUGA8 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/binance_futures |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:48 | 24,777 | -11 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:47 | 24,788 | -26 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 03:14 | 24,814 | -26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:39 | 24,840 | -30 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:18 | 24,870 | -27 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 24,897 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:21 | 24,916 | -26 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:11 | 24,942 | -25 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 24,967 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:50 | 24,978 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 24,989 | -12 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:54 | 25,001 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 25,017 | -25 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 25,042 | -16 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 25,058 | -17 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 25,075 | -4 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 25,079 | -17 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 25,096 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 25,118 | -17 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:38 | 25,135 | first reading |
Engagement
579 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 116 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.3%
- avg views ÷ 24,777 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,790
- 91 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 91
- of 579 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 579 (9 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 345,300 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 14:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,410
- Videos
- ≈6
- Links
- ≈89
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 91 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Photo, posted without a caption
Interesting
#BMT Bullish
#HAEDAL bullish
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto traders fomo after Trump lost. Chart
Close #BMT
#BMT Bullish
Interesting
I m not bullish on Bitcoin & bigcaps But while we are waiting for big moves of bigaps, other smallcaps still can pump
ready for round 2
Showing the 12 most recent of 579 posts we hold for @binance_futures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @binance_futures as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 30 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 2 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 15 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@wolfoftrading · 120,678#1
@cryptosignals0rg · 44,399#2
@next10xgem1 · 322,319#3
@binancemafia · 12,952#4
@coincodecap · 25,243#5
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,629#6
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,284#7
@thecryptoexpress · 248,315#8
@BCUSAReal · 145,523#9
@cryptovirussignals · 1,840#10
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,322#11
@binance_360 · 101,002#12
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 101,440#13
@Binance_360_spot · 8,379#14
@gorilla_crypto · 181,531#15
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,469#16
@crypto_freemium · 11,651#17
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,551#18
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 131,207#19
@Wolf_Of_Trading_ViP · 6,456#20
@RocketWallet_Official · 22,674#21
@Official_GCR · 53,325#22
@Always_winn · 6,238#23
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,084#24
@whalescryptovip · 199,984#25
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 88,877#26
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,759#27
@CryptoRROFFICAIL · 174,825#28
@Whales_Pumps · 53,474#29
@Scalping_300 · 42,754#30
@RosePremiumm · 140,233#31
@binancekillers · 241,597#32
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 150,100#33
@FedRussianInsiders · 114,182#34
@cryptobull · 13,620#35
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,106#36
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 315,906#37
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 310,475#38
@AlgoBotAnnouncements · 9,137#39
@TrustTraade · 101,727#40
@WatcherGuru · 631,123#41
@thebull_crypto · 171,176#42
@binance_announcements · 3,232,876#43
@Master_of_binanace · 10,723#44
@crypto_musk1 · 81,623#45
@whale_alert_io · 296,315#46
@drprofitfreebycf · 5,331#47
@CryptoHeaven · 44,869#48
@cryptobullet · 81,958#49
@imanhosseinif · 6,726#50
@arscryptocalls7 · 127,065#51
@KingCryptoCalls · 296,164#52
@roshaniacademy_crypto · 5,833#53
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,694#54
@TCGFORYOU · 74,507#55
@ggshot · 94,656#56
@Whalesguide · 185,169#57
@cointelegraph · 326,509#58
@thewolfcrypto_official · 34,192#59
@DoctorProfit_Crypto · 21,968#60
@CryptoSharksTelegram · 16,533#61
@Crypto_Cove_Signals · 3,914#62
@CryptoMermaids · 32,350#63
@VIPRosePremium · 369 (as read 13 September 2026)#64
@CryptoCoinsCoachCF · 4,558#65
@PAIDROSE · 137,296#66
@rose · 85,073#67
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,475#68
@BitcoinBullets · 97,050#69
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@RocketWallet_Official · 22,674
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
@coincodecap · 25,243
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@cryptosignals0rg · 44,399
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@wolfoftrading · 120,678
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,313
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 28 September 2026
@RavenSignalsPro · 48,306
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 18,592
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 October 2026
@BinanceCryptoKillers · 28,897
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 August 2026
@cryptotipstrick · 18,090
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 September 2026
@wolfxsignal_officials · 124,031
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@UniversalCrypto_Live · 17,858
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 4 September 2026
@fatpigsignalsofficialTG · 82,178
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
@fatpigsignals · 41,296
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@FedRussianInsiders · 114,182
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@VerifiedCryptoTraders0 · 63,807
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,647
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@drcrypto_trading · 28,494
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@cryptomiami · 96,668
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 150,100
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@fortunetradersofficial · 26,347
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 68,101
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_retro · 380,428
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@bitcoin_industry · 419,140
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Big · 18,222
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance signals” (@binance_futures), 24,777 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binance_futures.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.