Arbitrum (ARB) Has the Capacity for More Growth The price of the Arbitrum token is moving in correlation with the news making the rounds. Arbitrum is now ranked as the third-biggest platform by income. Furthermore, this revenue goes to the token-controlled treasury. Even trading indicators don't hint at a strong pullback. Let's take a closer look below. You can read more here: https://cryptosignals.org/technical-a…

Channel
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals0rg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,829subscribers
-828 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001173711569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptosignals0rg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptosignals0rg |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:40 | 45,829 | -68 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 45,897 | -38 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 45,935 | -42 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:52 | 45,977 | -22 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:05 | 45,999 | -31 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 46,030 | -56 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:37 | 46,086 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 46,103 | -27 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 46,130 | -33 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 46,163 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 46,170 | -58 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:39 | 46,228 | -27 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 46,255 | -46 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 46,301 | -20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 46,321 | -20 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 46,341 | -22 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 46,363 | -29 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 46,392 | -28 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 46,420 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:19 | 46,433 | first reading |
Engagement
209 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.25%
- avg views ÷ 45,829 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 571
- 166 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.42%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 166
- of 209 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 102 of 166 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 209 (3 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 94,740 |
| Reactions total | 247 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Sept 2026, 23:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,130
- Videos
- ≈39
- Links
- ≈12,700
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
292 reactions across 120 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 205 | 70.2% | |
| 👍 | 66 | 22.6% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 6.85% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.342% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 123 of the 209 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 209 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cryptosignals0rg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 209 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
FREE SIGNAL 🚨 SIGNAL ACTIVATED 🚨 Buy Limit APTUSD 📍 Entry: 0.6388 🛑 SL: 0.6234 🎯 TP: 0.6717 ⚡ RRR: 1:1.8 Waiting for the dip. NB: This order will become invalid if not triggered within the next 24 hours.
❤5👍4
📈 Enhance Your Trading Strategy! Bybit is offering an exclusive $20 bonus and a guaranteed $500 USDT Derivatives Airdrop to our valued Crypto Signals members! This is your opportunity to boost your trading potential. Why This Offer is Special: 🎆 Only available to our dedicated Crypto Signals community! 🎆 A token of appreciation for your trust and engagement. Here’s How to Claim: ✨ Sign up using our exclusive link…
🤖 AlgoBot Forex Copy Trading is live Want to follow our automated forex strategy without managing every trade manually? Before deciding, you can review our performance through independent tracking platforms: 📊 SignalStart https://www.signalstart.com/analysis/algobot-copy-trading/287718 📈 Myfxbook https://www.myfxbook.com/members/AlgoBotTrader/algobot-copy-trading/11435945 🔗 Learn more and join AlgoBot Forex Copy…
🔥1
Hyperliquid (HYPE) Has a Good Chance of Seeing Further Price Growth The Hyperliquid token has experienced significant growth since the beginning of the year. The price of the token has risen from around $21 to above $84, representing an increase of approximately 300% since January. Hyperliquid has also launched permissionless prediction markets through HIP-4, creating new utility for HYPE, with builders required to …
Zcash Is Trending Again: Why Investors Are Paying Attention to ZEC Zcash (ZEC) has suddenly become one of the hottest names in the cryptocurrency market. After years of remaining largely outside the spotlight, the privacy-focused cryptocurrency surged above $1,000 on September 4, reaching an intraday high of about $1,050.70. ZEC has now nearly doubled in value over the past month, pushing its market capitalization t…
⚠️ GAIN CRYPTOSIGNALS.ORG PRO ACCESS with AvaTrade⚠️ 💰 Don't Miss Trades! Quality Over Quantity, 1:3 Risk Reward! 🧠 Learn from Top Traders and Trade Like a PRO! 🔥 Unlimited Content and Winning Traders! 💎 Classified Crypto Tips 💎 Crypto VIP Group 💎 Crypto Course Lifetime access for free, saving over £1600 a year! 1️⃣ Register with AvaTrade 2️⃣ Minimum deposit: 250 USD 3️⃣ Use this account for trading Send a scr…
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!46%
- 👍 Already had them on33%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)13%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🚨 ATTENTION 50,000+ MEMBERS 🚨 Only ~1-2k of you are actually SEEING our signals right now… 😱 That means 50,000+ are missing winning entries DAILY because notifications are OFF! 🔥 Fix it in 10 seconds: 1️⃣ Tap the channel name at the top 2️⃣ Tap the bell icon 3️⃣ Select "Enabled" ✅ VIP members get these signals 30-60 mins earlier + trailing stops + full risk management → https://www.whop.com/cryptosignalsvip Let's…
$12.7B in Suspicious Crypto Activity Shows Why Investors Need Better Protection Crypto investment scams are becoming harder to spot, and authorities now have another warning for investors. The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) says it identified approximately $12.7 billion in financial activity linked to suspected digital-asset investment scams between September 2023 and December 2025. You can read mor…
❤1
Zcash (ZEC) Sustains Above the $1,000 Baseline ZEC’s 24-Hour Market Chart The Zcash market jumped significantly in the previous session, pushing the price to new heights above the $1,000 level. Although the ongoing session is bearish, the token remains trading above the $1,200 price mark. Likewise, the market, at the time of writing, still stands above the 9-day Exponential Moving Average (EMA) line. Meanwhile, t…
🔄 BAT UPDATE Closed at 0.07460. +86 pips. Clean win. Well played.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 209 posts we hold for @cryptosignals0rg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!46%
- 👍 Already had them on33%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)13%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!50%
- 👍 Already had them on42%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)8%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!57%
- 👍 Already had them on18%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)18%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!63%
- 👍 Already had them on17%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)13%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!66%
- 👍 Already had them on23%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)6%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Did you just turn notifications ON?
- ✅ Yes, just turned them on!41%
- 👍 Already had them on41%
- ❌ Still off (tell us why in comments)7%
- 🤔 What’s notifications?11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@AlgoBotAnnouncements · 9,330#1
@binance_futures · 25,793#2
@wolfoftrading · 129,736#3
@learn2tradectypto · 22,384#4
@crypto_musk1 · 81,529#5
@leaks_vip_signals · 10,406#6
@next10xgem1 · 333,179#7
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 330,638#8
@Coin_Signals · 73,582#9
@binance_360 · 101,829#10
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569#11
@altsignals · 27,501#12
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426#13
@bananaleaks · 6,832#14
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,954#15
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,761#16
@Binance_360_spot · 8,394#17
@BCUSAReal · 148,051#18
@Always_winn · 6,244#19
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516#20
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,621#21
@RocketWallet_Official · 23,645#22
@Crypto_Safe_Calls · 134,703#23
@learn2tradenews · 37,949#24
@cheat_brawl_stars · 9,649#25
@arscryptocalls7 · 131,590#26
@AmericanCryptoTrading · 19,850#27
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,536#28
@Crypto_TA_King_Verified · 92,816#29
@Whales_Pumps · 52,930#30
@CryptoMonk_Japan · 43,399#31
@thewolfcrypto_official · 33,794#32
@binancemafia · 13,366#33
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,988#34
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607#35
@fortunetradersofficial · 26,591#36
@CryptoSignalFuturesSpot · 13,544#37
@Official_GCR · 53,141#38
@ESTROFFICIAL · 48,894#39
@RavenSignalsPro · 78,191#40
@whalescryptovip · 209,022#41
@BBB_Signals · 40,753#42
@Crypt0_Hustle · 28,737#43
@cryptoamanclub · 105,397#44
@vip_signal · 189,716#45
@binancekillers · 300,874#46
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 211,337#47
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,780#48
@FedRussianInsiders · 123,281#49
@BitcoinBullets · 103,081#50
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 47,601#51
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,039#52
@coincodecap · 25,264#53
@cryptobull · 13,900#54
@TrustTraade · 108,008#55
@BitcoinBullets_VipOfficial · 21,165#56
@FedRussianInsidersOfficial · 21,530#57
@VIPRosePremium · 376 (as read 27 August 2026)#58
@cryptovirussignals · 1,899#59
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 8,394#60
@Master_of_binanace · 10,766#61
@WatcherGuru · 627,022#62
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 19,075#63
@imanhosseinif · 6,906#64
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP · 25,203#65
@RoseSignalsPremium · 97,399#66
@BinanceLiquidations · 181,534#67
@whale_alert_io · 301,693#68
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 21,040#69
@roshaniacademy_crypto · 5,756#70
@thecryptoexpress · 261,006#71
@Scalping_300 · 43,842#72
@crypto_freemium · 11,781#73
@thebull_crypto · 176,069#74
@FedRussianInsiders_Vip · 18,109#75
@sublimetraders · 4,699#76
@ggshot · 93,391#77
@BinanceKillersVipOfficial · 24,954#78
@cointelegraph · 336,646#79
@fatpigsignals · 42,426#80
@cryptobullet · 67,589#81
@cryptO0_g_e_e_k · 26,798#82
@wolfxsignal_officials · 146,521#83
@BitcoinBulletsInsidersVip · 16,718#84
@news_crypto · 99,733#85
@CoinBureau · 117,488#86
@crypto_pumps_p · 198,258#87
@CryptoHeaven · 46,450#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wolfoftrading · 129,736
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@UniversalCrypto_Live · 32,471
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 4 September 2026
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 141,651
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
@JacobCryptoClanDiscord · 94,318
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 August 2026
@RavenSignalsPro · 78,191
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_scalp_signals · 29,966
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 7 September 2026
@wallstreetqueenofficialTG · 173,776
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 August 2026
@BitcoinBullets · 103,081
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 August 2026
@fatpigsignalsofficialTG · 96,663
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 18 August 2026
@VerifiedCryptoTraders0 · 63,846
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 21 August 2026
@fatpigsignals · 42,426
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@DeFimillion · 421,795
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@FedRussianInsiders · 123,281
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
@BULLSTAR1 · 79,562
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
@wolfoftrading_support · 54,800
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@CryptopumpcIub · 40,219
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 19 August 2026
@bitcoin_industry · 440,254
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@wolfxsignal_officials · 146,521
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 211,337
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 134,831
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@cryptopumps · 42,759
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@Cryptoy · 34,621
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@binancekillers · 300,874
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
@TrustTraade · 108,008
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Signals” (@cryptosignals0rg), 45,829 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosignals0rg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.