Crypto market analysis, trading insights and educational content.
We do not provide financial advice.
Trading involves risk, always do your own research.
Founder: @BULLSTAR_ADMIN
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
28 measurements spanning 30 days, net +901. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,019–80,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Sept 2026, 21:55
80,646
+1,767
3 Sept 2026, 21:02
78,879
-305
2 Sept 2026, 13:02
79,184
-272
1 Sept 2026, 13:44
79,456
-286
31 Aug 2026, 11:18
79,742
-39
30 Aug 2026, 12:47
79,781
+81
29 Aug 2026, 10:26
79,700
-294
28 Aug 2026, 09:08
79,994
+761
27 Aug 2026, 06:34
79,233
+26
26 Aug 2026, 04:06
79,207
-310
25 Aug 2026, 03:54
79,517
-284
23 Aug 2026, 19:23
79,801
-223
22 Aug 2026, 02:28
80,024
-499
20 Aug 2026, 16:26
80,523
+1,905
19 Aug 2026, 16:24
78,618
-160
18 Aug 2026, 19:22
78,778
-283
17 Aug 2026, 18:49
79,061
-376
16 Aug 2026, 17:07
79,437
-492
15 Aug 2026, 01:34
79,929
+1,418
13 Aug 2026, 17:28
78,511
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.90%
avg views ÷ 80,646 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,570
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
80 (14 July 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
317,340
Reactions total
17,338
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 07:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,510
Videos
≈44
Links
≈983
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
24,540 reactions across 77 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,310
25.7%
👍
6,229
25.4%
🔥
6,017
24.5%
😍
4,658
19.0%
🎉
1,215
4.95%
😁
71
0.289%
🥰
40
0.163%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,540 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
421
across the posts below
Posts paid on
76
of 77 we hold a reading for · 99%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BULLSTAR1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ETH just broke out of its multi-month range and reclaimed a key supply zone.
Price is now consolidating right above the flipped resistance, treating it as fresh support.
The strength of the breakout candle shows real buyer conviction, not just a quick spike.
As long as this zone holds, the structure favors continuation toward higher levels.
BTC Liquidation Heatmap
Strong liquidity is sitting around $80.5K - $80.7K above and $78.9K - $79K below. These zones could act as key targets for the next major move.
ETC delivered a 45% price move from the level we highlighted in our earlier market updates.
We shared ETC insights in our free channels, allowing our community to follow the market as it developed.
We’ll continue sharing market analysis and updates across our channels.
For any questions or requests: @BULLSTAR_ADMIN
🆘FLASH VIP SALE🆘
The market is heating up and we’re getting ready for some of the biggest opportunities ahead. 📈
We really don't want you to miss them, and that’s why we’re opening a limited number of VIP spots for the biggest discount we’ve ever seen!!
🟢1 Month $49 (was $60)
🟢1 Year $149 (was $250)
🟢Lifetime $199 (was $350)
If you’ve been waiting to join, this is the time, Limited spots. ⏳
💰 USDT (TRC20):
TT6Tg…
ETC IS MOVING ACCORDING TO PLAN
A few days ago, we shared our analysis on ETC/USDT and highlighted the potential bullish move from the support zone.
So far, ETC is following the plan perfectly.
The price is holding above the key support area and the structure remains bullish. If ETC continues to respect this setup, the next targets remain around $8.00 - $9.00.
We shared this SignaI for free with all of you, and as we mentioned, it reached +72% pro'fit.
Congratulations! 🚀 t.me/BULLSTAR_ADMIN
🔥58❤54👍50😍34
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @BULLSTAR1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@BULLSTAR1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
7 September 2026
Most recent edit
7 September 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Blockchain Usa Official ( Binance ) 🐋 @BCUSAReal · 148,051#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Infinity Signals @Infinity_Crypto_Signals · 77,875 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Cryptoxnft | Free Crypto & BTC Updates 📈 @cryptoxnfts · 45,974 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Kahramanov | Crypto 📈 @kahramanov_trader · 58,439 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 August 2026
Crypto Miami 🌴🚀 @cryptomiami · 105,579 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BULLSTAR - SIGNALS” (@BULLSTAR1), 80,646 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BULLSTAR1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.