Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

Channel

Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

@DenmarkSnipers

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,325subscribers

-550 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001794357158
TypeChannel
Username@DenmarkSnipers
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DenmarkSnipers

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@DenmarkSnipers/2768 · this entry28 May 2026, 08:45 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/111828 May 2026, 08:52 UTC0.987 minutes
@DenmarkSnipers/2753 · this entry21 May 2026, 09:23 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/110321 May 2026, 09:35 UTC0.9812 minutes
@DenmarkSnipers/2762 · this entry25 May 2026, 09:53 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/111225 May 2026, 10:06 UTC0.9814 minutes
@DenmarkSnipers/2761 · this entry25 May 2026, 09:40 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/111125 May 2026, 09:51 UTC0.9811 minutes
@DenmarkSnipers/2757 · this entry23 May 2026, 08:48 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/110723 May 2026, 08:51 UTC0.983 minutes
@DenmarkSnipers/2759 · this entry24 May 2026, 08:24 UTC@DenmarkSnipers_vip/110924 May 2026, 08:36 UTC0.9812 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@DenmarkSnipers_vip10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.988 minutesthis entry (100)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 May 2026 to 29 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @DenmarkSnipers — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,32515,87515,6007 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,875 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,873 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,862 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,838 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,808 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,803 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,793 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,776 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,758 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,741 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,730 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,713 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,701 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,684 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,671 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,650 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,637 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,629 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,621 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,613 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,589 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,564 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,552 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,533 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,517 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,491 subscribers7 September 2026 — 15,454 subscribers10 September 2026 — 15,417 subscribers12 September 2026 — 15,390 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,368 subscribers15 September 2026 — 15,353 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,325 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -550. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,243–15,958 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:5715,325-28
15 Sept 2026, 20:1915,353-15
14 Sept 2026, 07:2015,368-22
12 Sept 2026, 16:1915,390-27
10 Sept 2026, 18:5515,417-37
7 Sept 2026, 18:1515,454-37
4 Sept 2026, 21:5515,491-26
3 Sept 2026, 06:5915,517-16
2 Sept 2026, 01:2415,533-19
1 Sept 2026, 02:1615,552-12
31 Aug 2026, 04:1415,564-25
30 Aug 2026, 04:0615,589-24
29 Aug 2026, 01:5615,613-8
28 Aug 2026, 04:1915,621-8
27 Aug 2026, 04:2415,629-8
26 Aug 2026, 04:2815,637-13
25 Aug 2026, 04:1315,650-21
24 Aug 2026, 00:2715,671-13
22 Aug 2026, 09:1515,684-17
21 Aug 2026, 00:5415,701first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

29 May 2026, 10:14 UTC≈2,900 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#CTK is testing the lower boundary of the descending channel on the weekly chart🔍 The price is stabilizing at this key technical zone with signs of buying interest🧐 Strength above support could push the price toward $1.75🐃 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

29 May 2026, 10:02 UTC≈2,430 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#AR Arweave is shaping a descending channel formation on the weekly chart🔍 A new bullish trend could begin once the price clears the pattern👀 The next leg up could reach $50🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

28 May 2026, 08:45 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#ACH Alchemy Pay is retesting the lower border of the descending channel formation on the weekly chart👨‍💻 Signals point to a forthcoming bounce from this support zone🧐 If buyers stay active, the price could climb toward $0.055🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

28 May 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,590 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#VANA is ready to rebound from the broken falling wedge on the 3D timeframe🔥 This consolidation period is allowing momentum to rebuild for the next leg up👀 This momentum could drive the price toward $9.00🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

27 May 2026, 08:52 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#TAO Bittensor is consolidating within the descending channel formation on the 3D chart💁‍♂️ Market participants appear to be positioning for the next major move higher🔍 A successful break above the channel resistance could trigger a powerful upward surge toward $700📈 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

27 May 2026, 08:38 UTC916 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#ENA Ethena is consolidating above the broken descending channel formation on the 3D timeframe👨‍💻 The breakout level is under retest, which is key for trend continuation💁‍♂️ This bullish formation could deliver gains toward $0.67🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

26 May 2026, 09:58 UTC878 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#THETA Theta Network is testing the lower border of the descending channel on the weekly chart🧐 Heavy accumulation is visible at this support zone alongside increased buying volume💁‍♂️ The momentum could propel the price toward $3.24🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

26 May 2026, 09:47 UTC673 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#T Threshold is trading near the lower boundary of the falling wedge formation on the 3D timeframe🧐 This technical setup favors bullish positioning👀 A confirmed rebound might lift the price toward $0.021🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

25 May 2026, 09:53 UTC661 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#AXL Axelar consolidating within the descending channel pattern on the weekly chart👨‍💻 Building momentum suggests the pattern is preparing for an explosive breakout🔥 A successful break could trigger movement and propel the price toward $0.77🐃 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

25 May 2026, 09:40 UTC575 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#RLC has found support inside the descending channel formation on the 3D timeframe🧐 Strength is emerging from this established support zone, with buyers stepping in🔥 A bounce could push the price toward $1.86🐃 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

24 May 2026, 08:34 UTC578 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#WOO is attempting to rebound from the support zone inside the falling wedge formation on the 3D timeframe🧐 If buyers stay active, we could see the price climb toward $0.20✈️ ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

24 May 2026, 08:24 UTC667 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#FLUX is moving inside the descending channel pattern on the 3D timeframe💁‍♂️ This bullish pattern suggests preparation for a sharp upward move👨‍💻 A bounce from the midline might deliver gains toward $0.46🚀 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ "It is only matter of time time to be succesful." ° Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DenmarkSnipers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Profit Vip 🚀
@drprofitcryptosignal · 22,431
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 20 September 2026
Binance Killers Vip
@binancekillers_freesignal · 28,038
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 9 September 2026
Profit Crypto Calls
@Profittrde · 34,673
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
BULLSTAR - SIGNALS
@BULLSTAR1 · 80,758
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
Auto Forward Telegram BOT News
@Auto_Forward_Messages · 119,480
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Denmark Snipers 🇩🇰” (@DenmarkSnipers), 15,325 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DenmarkSnipers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.