Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fat Pig Signals

Channel

Fat Pig Signals

@fatpigsignals

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

42,465subscribers

-630 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001172953720
TypeChannel
Username@fatpigsignals
DescriptionFatpigsignals is not a fund nor do we have any association with any funds;we will never ask for users funds and strongly recommend never trusting anyone asking for funds claiming to be us. We offer studies and trading analysis. @dad10 and @gangplank123
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fatpigsignals

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

42,46543,09542,7806 August 2026 — 43,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,095 subscribers6 August 2026 — 43,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 43,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 43,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 43,044 subscribers10 August 2026 — 43,017 subscribers11 August 2026 — 43,000 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,973 subscribers12 August 2026 — 42,963 subscribers14 August 2026 — 42,961 subscribers15 August 2026 — 42,927 subscribers16 August 2026 — 42,901 subscribers17 August 2026 — 42,880 subscribers18 August 2026 — 42,863 subscribers19 August 2026 — 42,842 subscribers20 August 2026 — 42,828 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,773 subscribers23 August 2026 — 42,751 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,718 subscribers25 August 2026 — 42,694 subscribers26 August 2026 — 42,678 subscribers27 August 2026 — 42,675 subscribers28 August 2026 — 42,653 subscribers29 August 2026 — 42,633 subscribers30 August 2026 — 42,624 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,598 subscribers1 September 2026 — 42,577 subscribers2 September 2026 — 42,552 subscribers4 September 2026 — 42,489 subscribers6 September 2026 — 42,465 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 32 days, net -630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,371–43,190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 20:4042,465-24
4 Sept 2026, 08:4042,489-63
2 Sept 2026, 21:4542,552-25
1 Sept 2026, 23:3442,577-21
1 Sept 2026, 01:0442,598-26
30 Aug 2026, 21:2742,624-9
29 Aug 2026, 20:5742,633-20
28 Aug 2026, 20:4542,653-22
27 Aug 2026, 23:4242,675-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:5442,678-16
25 Aug 2026, 21:5742,694-24
25 Aug 2026, 00:5542,718-33
23 Aug 2026, 09:5842,751-22
21 Aug 2026, 19:3842,773-55
20 Aug 2026, 14:4542,828-14
19 Aug 2026, 18:0642,842-21
18 Aug 2026, 20:5442,863-17
17 Aug 2026, 22:0242,880-21
16 Aug 2026, 21:4342,901-26
15 Aug 2026, 10:2342,927first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 70 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.91%
avg views ÷ 42,465 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,930
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held26 (3 June 20263 September 2026)
Views total14,670
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 11:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
560
Videos
34
Links
2,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

232 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12754.7%
🔥4619.8%
👏3213.8%
🆒104.31%
😍93.88%
🍾83.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 232 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:44 UTC≈1,590 views7 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🚀 +1,000% AGGREGATE GAINS IN 30 DAYS 📈🔥 We skip the noise and trade pure fundamentals. By spotting valuation mismatches and hidden catalysts before the crowd, our alerts printed an aggregate +1,000% return this past month. 🧠⚡ We didn't just follow the volume—we led it. We capitalized on the Robinhood Chain liquidity rotation with early spot entries on PONS at roughly $0.08 before the network took off, while aggress

5🍾1🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,370 viewsread 9 September 2026

These are just a few of the winning calls our members capitalized on this week. What are you waiting for to join us ? Reach out today to get started. @dad10 or @gangplank123

21 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈3,220 viewsread 9 September 2026

[LOW/MID-CAP] TAKE PROFIT (EARLY) — PUMP Banking a portion of PUMP here at ~$0.00336 — about +24% from the $0.002703 entry. We're taking some off EARLY, just short of our $0.003401 first target, rather than waiting for the exact level. Holding the rest for the higher targets. Momentum is strong, so we lock in part of the +24% now to de-risk and let the remainder run.

8 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈4,910 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

July 2026 Performance Update July presented a challenging, sideways market for many retail traders, with Bitcoin consolidating and broader conditions remaining heavily suppressed. Despite this flat environment, our trading group successfully secured solid portfolio gains. We achieved this outperformance through strategically executed options trades and highly targeted, catalyst-driven altcoin signals. Ready to t

8🆒2

30 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,190 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🔥 BTC covered call closed with 94.67% premium captured. Contract: BTC-31JUL26-67000-C Result: • 0.0142 BTC captured • 94.67% premium captured • Only 35 days held Another structured options setup executed inside the VIP group.

8👏3🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC≈5,150 views12 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🏆 VIP WEEKLY PERFORMANCE REVIEW 🏆 Our VIP members secured incredible profits this week across both spot and options! We don't gamble—every single spot position we take is backed by a rock-solid fundamental thesis and a strict profit-taking system. This week’s results speak for themselves: 📈 Spot Trading Gains (Fundamental Plays) • $GEOD: +67% (T1 & T2 smashed) • $LDO: +24% • $CVX: +17% 🔥 Options Trading Gains • $SO

7🔥4🆒1

22 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC≈4,820 views8 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Another options trade closed successfully BTC-28AUG26-55000-P was closed after 9 days, capturing 58.06% of the premium. If you’re only watching spot signals, you’re missing one of the most powerful ways to generate yield in crypto. Our VIP members receive these options setups with entry, management and close updates. Access the next options setups: 👉 @dad10 👉 @gangplank123 ⚠️ Admins never contact you first. Ver

👏62

13 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC≈5,520 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🚨 7 OPTIONS TRADES. 7 PROFITABLE CLOSES. The latest BTC and ETH covered calls generated: ✅ $2,050.78 in collected results ✅ 72.32% average premium capture ✅ 7 profitable closes from 7 trades The total shown uses the minimum tracked position size. Results can be higher depending on allocation, number of contracts, execution price, and fees. Access the next options setups: 👉 @dad10 👉 @gangplank123 ⚠️ Admins never

8🔥5

29 Jun 2026, 16:10 UTC≈6,740 views22 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

🔥 BTC is selling off. We’re getting paid through it. While most traders are panic-watching the chart, this covered call captured 74.81% of its available premium in just 24 days. No prediction required. No hoping for a bounce. Just a structured setup doing exactly what it was built to do. Here’s the entire playbook: • Hold your BTC • Sell covered calls only when the setup is favorable • Let time decay do the heavy

18🔥2😍1🆒1

27 Jun 2026, 02:17 UTC≈5,950 views14 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥5👏43🍾1😍1

Signed dad

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @fatpigsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Rocket Wallet Signals
@RocketWallet_Official · 23,645
#1
Verified Crypto Traders ✅ ®
@VerifiedCryptoNews · 19,075
#2
Sublime Traders® Official - AI Trading Tools + Premium Crypto Signals
@sublimetraders · 4,708
#3
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 300,874
#4
Inner Circle VIP FREE
@innercirclevipbyCF · 7,621
#5
Crypto Freemium (Moderate - High Risk Calls)
@Crypto_Freemium2 · 7,536
#6
CryptoVirus 🦠
@cryptovirussignals · 1,899
#7
GG-Shøt. Indicator & Signals
@ggshot · 93,357
#8
Crypto Papa™️ | crypto signals
@cryptopapasignals · 2,017
#9
Crypto Leaks By Drvkich
@cryptoleakss · 7,911
#10
Technical CRYPTO Analyst
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 330,638
#11
MYC Signals
@mycryptopedia · 14,588
#12
Master of Binance - By Banana Bot
@Master_of_binanace · 10,766
#13
Bitcoin Premium signals
@legitsignalleaks · 729
#14
Binance 360 Spot - By Banana Bot
@Binance_360_spot · 8,394
#15
Crypto Planet Calls™
@CryptoPlanetCalls · 104,426
#16
NGR Trading
@NGR_Trading · 2,721
#17
Crypto Inner Circle®
@crypto_inner_circle_signals · 829
#18
DegenPump™ Crypto Pump Signals
@degenpump_crypto_pump_signals · 28,938
#19
RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦‍⬛
@RavenSignalsPro · 78,191
#20
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals0rg · 45,829
#21
Dr Profit VIP Free
@drprofitfreebycf · 4,985
#22
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@FedRussianInsiders · 123,281
#23
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 209,134
#24
Binance signals
@binance_futures · 25,793
#25
Wolf of Trading®
@wolfoftrading · 129,736
#26
Crypto Bull®
@cryptobull · 13,900
#27
Crypto Freemium
@crypto_freemium · 11,781
#28
Crypto Swings Den of Honor Free
@DenofhonorbyCF · 2,316
#29
Crypto Leak By GodLeak
@cryptoleaksz · 2,926
#30
Crypto VIP Signal
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 319,371
#31
Klondike Premium Freemium
@klondike_freemium · 2,119
#32
ارز دیجیتال با مصطفی روشنی
@roshaniacademy_crypto · 5,775
#33
Rose 🌹
@rose · 85,750
#34
CryptoBullet
@cryptobullet · 67,589
#35
Crypto Whale Pumps | Crypto Signals by @andreoutberg
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,780
#36
CoinCodeCap Classic
@coincodecap · 25,264
#37
Cryptosignals/Forex_Tradings Premium Free
@ForextradingsfreeCF · 2,044
#38
AlgoBot - Free AI Trading
@AlgoBotAnnouncements · 9,330
#39
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 54,243
#40
CryptoNinjas Trading 🥷🏿
@cryptoninjas_trading_ann · 20,167
#41
Margin Whales®
@marginwhales · 11,148
#42
Crypto Compass 360°
@cryptocompass360 · 931
#43
ارز دیجیتال با کروکودیل ها
@crocodiles_crypto · 746
#44
The Bull
@thebull_crypto · 176,069
#45
Crypto Vikings (Premium signals)
@VikingsAnalyst · 37,901
#46
CFTopTrading
@CFTopTrading · 67,755
#47
🌹 Rose premium Signals BY Godleak 🌹
@rosepremiumvip · 3,425
#48
Gorilla Crypto
@gorilla_crypto · 198,569
#49
The Crypto Express
@thecryptoexpress · 261,006
#50
Federal Russian Insiders VIP Free
@FedRussianInsidersFreeVIP · 1,523
#51
Signalpeak
@Signalpeak24 · 20,492
#52
Crypto Investing
@cryptosignalsoriginal · 988
#53
EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 91,400
#54
CoinGape Crypto News
@coingape · 23,057
#55
Crypto Pump Island
@crypto_pump_island · 116,892
#56
Trading Crypto Guide ™
@TCGFORYOU · 75,607
#57
Aidin TA
@aidinmo · 384
#58
Klondike (Crypto Rush) ⚠️
@CryptoKlondike · 59,838
#59
Crypto Cove
@CryptoCove · 29,082
#60
Binance Killers®
@binance_killers_signals · 1,143
#61
Whales Crypto Guide
@Whalesguide · 202,470
#62
Oliver’s Trade
@oliverstrade · 18,667
#63
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreet_queen_signals · 852
#64
The American Trader 📈
@TheAmericanTraders · 3,634
#65
Crypto Pump Exclusive
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 134,831
#66
Fed. Russian Insiders®
@federal_russian_insiders · 873
#67
╭⊱zCrypto Trading⊱╮
@Zcrypto55 · 90
#68
CRYPTO AMAN VIP (PREMIUM)
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,954
#69
Crypto News
@cryptonews_net · 2,798
#70
Crypto AMAN®
@crypto_aman_vip_signals · 778
#71
Cornix Announcements
@cornix_announcements · 5,444
#72
KING CRYPTO ️
@KingCryptoCalls · 313,516
#73
VIP Leaks Club™
@VIPLeaksClub · 3,068
#74
AlphaTradeZone®
@AlphaTradeZone · 16,317
#75
TrustTrade_لایو ترید
@TrustTraade · 108,008
#76
CF Leverage Trading VIP Free
@TradingbyCFfreeCF · 956
#77
imanhosseini_finance
@imanhosseinif · 6,906
#78
Bitcoin Bullets®
@BitcoinBullets · 103,081
#79
Delbert's Trading Team
@delbert_trading · 5,926
#80
Filografista - Análises gráficas • Investimentos • Indicadores e Estratégias
@filografista · 754
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DegenPump™ Crypto Pump Signals
@degenpump_crypto_pump_signals · 28,938
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 8 September 2026
Crypto Signals
@cryptosignals0rg · 45,829
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fat Pig Signals” (@fatpigsignals), 42,465 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fatpigsignals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.