Channel
@Zcrypto55
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
90subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001142281137 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Zcrypto55 |
| Created | Between 1 July 2016 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Zcrypto55 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 90 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:24 | 89 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 88 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 88 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
in this month of August 2026, only this one setup is in play at the moment and avg entry price is around 64K and target area around 66K to 68K plus minus for my setup , also shared in this channel #NFA and #DYOR. SL has been shifted to just above breakeven to remain safe and lets see what will be the outcome. Cheers
in the month of July 2026, I had traded only 3 setups and shared in this channel and 2 are massive RR success and 1 is loss (minimal ) so overall generated good returns.
#NFP August 2026 released today and overall it is supportive for #BTC , if interpreted correctly so #BTC likely to pump here till 66K to 68K plus minus region and in the coming week if no bad event or news then it can test 69K / 70K + area. Lets see. its not a financial Advise #NFA
Trade Seup update: SL on breakEven shifted #NFA
A Pump backed by the catalyst of NFP Data release can be unfolded , Lets see . its not a financial advise , #NFA
NFP Data Release today so it can extremely volatile, Be advised to stay out of market #NFP #DYOR
For Every $1 buying there is a Selling of $2 so sharp moves downward and upward is coming soon. High volatility Probability is rising from next upcoming Days/weeks.
BTC UPDATE: $64,000 Line Bearish Scenario: 1) A confirmed close below $64,000 will likely send the price down for a drop to $63,350 and $62,335 . 2) A break below $62,000 targets the $59,356–$62,492 range. Bullish Scenario: A strong closing back above $64,600–$65,000 would invalidate the breakdown, potentially retesting $66,200.
Update on setup: its failed and stopped out.
onchain tracking is still positive , buyers coming in and price dropping , Absorption continues
#BTC Setup Update: Not going well so far. lets se
still in pipeline as CVD increasing and inflow , either this liquidity to pump hard or DUMP hard, Lets see but as prices are already too much down so odds in favor of upside but nothing is guaranteed.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Zcrypto55. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“╭⊱zCrypto Trading⊱╮” (@Zcrypto55), 90 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Zcrypto55.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.