Good traders do not need to predict every move. They need a plan when the move comes. Today, GOLD gave Raven Forex VIP exactly that: ✅ +40 PIPS ✅ +90 PIPS ✅ +130 PIPS ✅ +170 PIPS Four targets reached from one setup. And the week has only just started. 📩 Want to see what Forex VIP looks like from the inside? @RavenProSupport

Channel
RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛
@RavenSignalsPro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
77,522subscribers
-2,102 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001930642453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavenSignalsPro |
| Description | Base your moves on real data from former JP Morgan investors. 🔒 | VIP channels: 8-14 Trading Signals / Month, AutoBot, Market Updates) - www.ravensignalspro.com/services ✉️ Support: @RavenProSupport 📊 | Stats: https://t.me/ravensignalspro_stats |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 36 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavenSignalsPro |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 77,522 | -181 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 77,703 | -159 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 77,862 | -87 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 77,949 | -37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 77,986 | -58 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 78,044 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 78,084 | -107 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 78,191 | -133 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 78,324 | -65 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 78,389 | -44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:48 | 78,433 | -86 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 78,519 | -57 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 78,576 | -48 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 78,624 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 78,645 | -28 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 78,673 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 78,682 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 78,716 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 78,759 | -51 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 78,810 | first reading |
Engagement
167 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.5%
- avg views ÷ 77,522 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,710
- 65 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 65
- of 167 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 167 (4 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 631,419 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 14:43 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,620
- Videos
- ≈79
- Links
- ≈924
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
You asked for consistency. So here’s another full week. 📊 September 28 – October 4 🪙 Crypto: +206.18% 📈 Forex: +645 PIPS And the weekly accuracy: Crypto: 87.50% TP/SL Forex: 85.71% TP/SL Last Friday, 40% of you told us that more consistent weekly results would make you more likely to join. We heard you. So we’ll keep showing the numbers, week after week. 📊 Check the history yourself: @ravensignalspro_stats
You told us what matters before joining Raven VIP. The #1 answer? 40% → More consistent weekly results Not more promises. Not more explanations. You want to see Raven perform week after week. Fair. That is exactly why we publish the full report every Monday and keep our past results available for you to check. Judge us by the record, not one screenshot. 📊 Review it yourself: @ravensignalspro_stats
What would make you most likely to join Raven VIP?
- More consistent weekly results43%
- More Forex & Crypto wins like this19%
- Clearer explanation of how signals work0%
- Easier automation / less monitoring14%
- A better price / offer24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📊 COMMUNITY POLL What would make you most likely to join Raven VIP?
🔥 FOREX AND CRYPTO VIP HAS BEEN MOVING. This is what members have been following inside VIP. Not one result. Multiple setups producing opportunities. 📩 Want access to VIP? @RavenProSupport
Video, posted without a caption
Most traders do not struggle because they cannot press BUY or SELL. They struggle with everything around the decision. Where do I enter? Is it too late? Where should I take profit? Where do I stop the trade? That uncertainty is exactly what structured setups are meant to reduce. Raven VIP gives you the levels first, so you are not trying to build the plan while the market is already moving. 🌐 Explore Raven VI…
🛑 The Stop Loss is not there because we expect every trade to fail. It is there because no setup is guaranteed. Before entering a trade, you should already know: Where does the idea stop making sense? That is what the SL helps define. Without it, one bad decision can turn into: “Maybe it will come back…” Then: “Just a little longer…” Then emotion takes over. Raven setups include the risk level BEFORE the tra…
📉 LONG is not the only way traders look for opportunities. When Raven posts a SHORT setup, it means the idea is that price may move DOWN from the planned entry area. So instead of buying low and selling higher... the trade is structured around benefiting from a downward move. The setup still gives you the important levels: ✅ Entry Zone ✅ Take Profit targets ✅ Stop Loss Simple direction. Clear plan. 📩 Still lea…
💬 “Do I HAVE to use Cornix?” No. You can follow Raven Crypto signals manually if that is what you prefer. Cornix is simply there for traders who want more automation and convenience. So your choice is: 📱 Follow manually or 🤖 Use Cornix to help automate the setup You do not need to make trading more complicated than it needs to be. If the technical side has been one of the reasons you have not joined, message u…
💬 “What actually happens after I join?” This is something more people should ask BEFORE paying. Once you get VIP access, you can start following the setups shared inside the channel. You will also have the Raven Trading Guide to help you understand the process. No need to join and then wonder: “Where do I start?” The goal is to make the first steps clear. 📩 Want to know exactly what access includes? @RavenProS…
Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @RavenSignalsPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What would make you most likely to join Raven VIP?
- More consistent weekly results43%
- More Forex & Crypto wins like this19%
- Clearer explanation of how signals work0%
- Easier automation / less monitoring14%
- A better price / offer24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When you look at a trading signal, what makes you trust it most?
- Clear entry + TP + SL52%
- Consistent weekly results11%
- Seeing losing trades too26%
- Clear explanations11%
- Support when I have questions0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How would you follow Raven Crypto signals?
- Manually48%
- Auto Trading with Cornix32%
- One Click Follow with Cornix8%
- I’m still learning how it works20%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you joined Raven VIP today, what would you use it for most?
- Crypto signals64%
- Forex signals12%
- Both Crypto + Forex29%
- Saving time finding setups5%
- I’m still just watching12%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When a good setup appears, what usually makes you miss it?
- I see it too late52%
- I don’t know where to enter5%
- I don’t know when to take profit19%
- I am busy and cannot monitor charts14%
- I hesitate too much10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What's stopping you from joining Raven VIP?
- I still need more trust/proof47%
- I'm not ready financially26%
- I'm worried about trading risk11%
- I'm not sure how the signals work5%
- I still have questions11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ravensignalspro_stats · 721#1
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 135,192#2
@binancekillers · 308,839#3
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 321,690#4
@FedRussianInsiders · 120,085#5
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 46,759#6
@binance_futures · 25,372#7
@cryptosignals0rg · 45,172#8
@AlgoBotAnnouncements · 9,248#9
@FedRussianInsidersOfficial · 21,207#10
@binancemafia · 13,221#11
@cryptovirussignals · 1,867#12
@learn2tradectypto · 22,143#13
@hitpumpangels · 3,336#14
@wolfxsignals_stats · 5,273#15
@Master_of_binanace · 10,754#16
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 160,934#17
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,841#18
@Whalesguide · 195,471#19
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,770#20
@lvxsignalsfree · 660 (as read 19 August 2026)#21
@Binance_360_spot · 8,443#22
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,562#23
@binance_360 · 101,956#24
@crypto_musk1 · 81,749#25
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 544,638#26
@crypto_pump_island · 109,105#27
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 25,721#28
@KingCryptoCalls · 306,058#29
@CryptoInfinitum · 14,852#30
@altsignals · 27,153#31
@aman_crypto_signals · 6,688#32
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 96,667#33
@megafutures · 10,858#34
@crypto_pumps_p · 194,924#35
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 197,129#36
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 85,004#37
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 209,131#38
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 311,984#39
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,521#40
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 51,875#41
@wolfoftrading · 126,671#42
@Trading_Signals8 · 158,768#43
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 70,712#44
@coincodecap · 25,377#45
@BitcoinBullets · 100,706#46
@Crypto_Insiders_Club · 7,974#47
@thecryptoexpress · 254,112#48
@BitcoinBullets_VipOfficial · 20,850#49
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP · 24,878#50
@Pumps_Signals_Trading_Whales · 20,402#51
@mexcpumpcoins · 11,657#52
@Binance_Hotbit_Kucoin_Pumps · 11,590#53
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,417#54
@dexpumps · 43,836#55
@Crypto_Vip_Rose_Signals_Pumps · 17,513#56
@cryptopumps · 42,161#57
@pumpleaks · 20,650#58
@mexc_pumpsignal · 37,696#59
@crypto1_pump · 4,387#60
@Pancakeswappumpss · 35,398#61
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,851#62
@Kucoin_english_pump · 11,015#63
@cryptobull · 13,778#64
@wallstreetgems · 36,425#65
@bigpumpsbinance · 22,492#66
@crypto_pumps_events_signals · 5,683#67
@sharks_pump · 4,127#68
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 8,214#69
@cryptoclubspump · 584#70
@BeSomebodyFX · 5,818#71
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 25,740#72
@pumpreview · 939#73
@rhinopumps · 22,111#74
@cryptotalkpump · 1,068#75
@wolfxcryptopromos · 1,156#76
@Binance_Pumps_Signals_Crypto_vip · 25,811#77
@FedRussianInsiders_Vip · 17,852#78
@snakesignal · 35,740#79
@Cryptoy · 34,519#80
@kucoin_crypto_pumps_trading · 27,441#81
@cryptocompass360 · 900#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 96,667
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 135,192
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@fatpigsignals · 41,967
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@crypto_pump_island · 109,105
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 544,638
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptopumps · 42,161
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 160,934
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 209,131
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,417
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@wallstreetgems · 36,425
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptosignals0rg · 45,172
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_p · 194,924
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Pumps_Signals_Trading_Whales · 20,402
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
@pumps20 · 59,381
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@bigpumpsbinance · 22,492
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@pumpleaks · 20,650
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@DeFimillion · 325,289
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@Pancakeswappumpss · 35,398
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@crypto_pumps_binance · 75,998
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 51,875
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 70,712
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 85,004
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@coincodecap · 25,377
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@dadpumps · 26,098
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛” (@RavenSignalsPro), 77,522 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavenSignalsPro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.