Channel
@crypto_pumps_binance
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
76,519subscribers
-2,336 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001854420915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_pumps_binance |
| Description | #Binancesignals #binancefutures #signalstelegram #Binance #Signals #crypto #bullrun |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_pumps_binance |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:19 | 76,519 | -92 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:56 | 76,611 | -72 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 76,683 | -66 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 76,749 | -83 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:41 | 76,832 | -174 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 77,006 | -235 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 77,241 | -121 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 77,362 | -83 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:12 | 77,445 | -80 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:08 | 77,525 | -62 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 77,587 | -122 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 77,709 | -67 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 77,776 | -82 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 77,858 | -27 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 77,885 | -41 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 77,926 | -50 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 77,976 | -101 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 78,077 | -58 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 78,135 | -66 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 78,201 | first reading |
58 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 58 (21 July 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 20,197 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 12:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Totalmarketcap is on its way back into bullish territory. Above the blue line = bullish Below the blue line = bearish The last weekly candle has already broken through. We think we'll see a retest here and then a move higher.
🔥$BULLA Update🔥 Target 11: $0.017✅ Target 12: $0.019✅ Target 13: $0.023✅ Target 14: $0.028✅ Target 15: $0.041✅ Target 16: $0.057✅ Target 17: $0.072✅ NEW HIGH: $0.127✅ Profit: 6,550% on 5x lev🚀 We knew about $BULLA when we signaled it, and it took less than 3 months to absolutely destroy all targets. over 14x without any leverage, generational wealth in a single trade🔥🔥🔥 Stay tunned for our next trades🚀
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US 30-year bond yield rises to 5.35%, highest level since June 2007.
⚡️ BITCOIN WAITS FOR CONFIRMATION BTC is holding inside an ascending triangle after rejection from supply, with the Ichimoku cloud above as resistance. A confirmed breakout or breakdown should reveal the next direction.
🚀 BITCOIN HAS BROKEN OUT OF THE PENNANT BTC pushed above the pennant with significant volume and is now testing the key support and resistance area around the breakout. A successful retest and continued acceptance above this zone would strengthen the bullish scenario and could prepare the market for another rally. Losing the level would delay confirmation.
$LTC and $ETC Higher
🇮🇷 Iranian Rial has hit an ALL-TIME LOW. You are a BILLIONAIRE in Iran if you have just $455.
Altcoins are about to become the biggest generational wealth creators of this cycle
#BTC breaks $81,000🚀
#BTC breaks $80,000🚀
₿ Strive adds $143 million in Bitcoin Strive has resumed treasury buying, acquiring Bitcoin at an average price of $79,431 per coin. The Nasdaq-listed asset manager now holds 23,156 BTC.
Strategy returns with a $370M Bitcoin purchase ₿ Strategy bought 4,603 BTC for $370 million, marking its first Bitcoin purchase since June. The reported average price was $80,318 per BTC. That price was about 29% above what the company received for coins it sold this summer.
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @crypto_pumps_binance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Pumps Binance Signals” (@crypto_pumps_binance), 76,519 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_pumps_binance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.