Altcoins are about to become the biggest generational wealth creators of this cycle

Channel
Pump Leaks
@pumpleaks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,008subscribers
-488 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001509614260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pumpleaks |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pumpleaks |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 05:02 | 21,008 | -48 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 21,056 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:28 | 21,079 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:53 | 21,097 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 21,112 | -28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 21,140 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:39 | 21,158 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 21,167 | -20 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 21,187 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 21,206 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 21,225 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 21,234 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:56 | 21,246 | -38 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:27 | 21,284 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 21,302 | -11 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 21,313 | -14 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 21,327 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 21,341 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 21,357 | -27 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 21,384 | first reading |
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.49%
- avg views ÷ 21,008 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 523
- 31 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 31
- of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,223 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
#BTC breaks $81,000🚀
#BTC breaks $80,000🚀
₿ Strive adds $143 million in Bitcoin Strive has resumed treasury buying, acquiring Bitcoin at an average price of $79,431 per coin. The Nasdaq-listed asset manager now holds 23,156 BTC.
Strategy returns with a $370M Bitcoin purchase ₿ Strategy bought 4,603 BTC for $370 million, marking its first Bitcoin purchase since June. The reported average price was $80,318 per BTC. That price was about 29% above what the company received for coins it sold this summer.
Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF flows diverge 📊 Highlighting a clear split in institutional fund flows: spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $201.9 million in outflows on Aug. 28, ending nine consecutive days of inflows. Ethereum funds, meanwhile, extended their inflow streak to 10 days with fresh capital.
#TOWNS is under 10m mc on Binance Spot and Futures Easy 2-3x
#TOWNS Bottom is in
BITCOIN IS ABOUT TO RECORD THE FIRST-EVER GREEN AUGUST DURING A BEAR MARKET!
🔥#SKR Short Update🔥 Filled all our entries and straight to targets. Target 1: $0.028✅ Target 2: $0.027✅ Target 3: $0.0255✅ Target 4: $0.024✅ Profit: 93.5% on 5x lev🚀
#SKR Boom
#SKR Short Exchange: Binance Futures Leverage: 3-5x Entry: 0.0290 - 0.0305 Targets: 0.028 - 0.027 – 0.0255 - 0.024 - 0.022 - 0.019 - 0.016 - 0.013 - 0.009 SL: Above 0.0321
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @pumpleaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@mega_pump_group · 32,729
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 5 September 2026
@wallstreetgems · 37,383
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptopumps · 42,825
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@KucoinPumpChannel · 43,909
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_binance · 77,241
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_p · 198,840
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 86,521
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,809
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 52,061
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 73,727
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 162,207
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 137,026
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 539,987
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 217,913
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@Pancakeswappumpss · 36,729
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@RavenSignalsPro · 78,191
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pump Leaks” (@pumpleaks), 21,008 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pumpleaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.