Channel
@Pro_CryptoAnalyst
On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,979subscribers
-134 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001914485153 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Pro_CryptoAnalyst |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 20 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Pro_CryptoAnalyst |
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
11,000 average views per post against 8,979 subscribers — an engagement rate of 122.2%. Across the 3,528 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,164–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.48% and 14.1%, with a median of 6.58%.
| Window | 30 days (11 August 2026 – 10 September 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 43 of 43 published in the window (0 exact, 43 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 471,840 |
| Mature posts only | 123.4% over 41 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,979 measured 7 September 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:eng · 3,528 channels · p10 0.784% · p25 2.48% · p50 6.58% · p75 14.1% · p90 26.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.716th percentile · 18.6× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.051% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | English · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 8,979 | -9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:33 | 8,988 | -42 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 9,030 | -45 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 9,075 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 9,085 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 9,102 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 9,113 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (12 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 471,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
#BTC Update: #BTC still going nowhere and remaining inside the #ChannelPattern, reacting near the supporting trendline with no decisive move emerging 📉🔴. Market can still push higher toward resistance but price has clearly slowed down — a concerning sign that bullish momentum may be fading 💪. Watch closely for whether buyers step in convincingly at the supporting line or whether the slowdown leads to a more meaning…
Options buyers spent the rally paying for upside — since price rolled over a week ago budget has swung back toward puts 📉🔴. One outsized put trade dominates the very end of that swing, skewing the read slightly 💪. Most notable shift is on the call side where upside spending has fallen sharply against last year's pace — this does not look like panic hedging but rather a measured reduction in bullish conviction ⚡️🎯👀
#ATOM Update: #ATOM going perfectly with the drawn zone working exactly as planned — back-to-back executions playing out beautifully 📈🟢💪. Market now looking clearly bullish with momentum shifting decisively in favor of buyers 🔴. If holding short positions move to breakeven immediately — take #Longs after a confirmed flip of the zone for the next move higher, structure now favors the upside and there is no reason to…
#BTC Update: #BTC following the uptrend move again and now forming a clean #ChannelPattern with bullish structure firmly intact 📈🟢💪. Price action looking increasingly ready for another leg up toward a new #HigherHigh 🔴. Setup looks promising and momentum is building in the right direction — stay in positions and let the trade run as the channel continues to support the bullish case for further upside continuation ⚡
Expensive week for bullish positioning — #Skew climbed back off its lows with volume #PutCallRatio bottoming at yearly lows before climbing hard as price slid 📉🔴. #PerpFunding pinned below neutral all month reinforcing the cautious backdrop 💪. Open interest tells a more cautious story — OI put/call ratio barely lifted off its bottom despite the repositioning. Until the carried book follows through, this remains repo…
#BTC.D Update: #BTC.D gave a range break and rejection, now attempting to reach the area around 60.77% once again 📉🔴. Rising dominance remains a concern — altcoins likely to go lower in the short term as money continues flowing toward #BTC 💪. If #BTC crashes simultaneously alongside rising dominance, the situation for altcoins could worsen significantly — stay cautious with any altcoin long positions and avoid over…
#BTC Update: #BTC gone sideways on the hourly timeframe forming #Support at $78,500 which is currently being tested 📉🔴. Structure remains uncertain at this level with bulls needing to defend it convincingly to maintain the current bullish momentum 💪. A close below $78,500 would open the door for a short-term drop toward the $76,500 area — watch the hourly candle close very closely as it will determine the immediate…
#GOLD Update: #GOLD gave a good retracement before moving strongly upward delivering an impressive 7.21% in profits 📈🟢💪. Setup playing out beautifully with bullish momentum remaining firmly intact and price showing clear upside intention 🔴. Next #Resistance sitting at $4,765 — expect price to reach that level and use it as the primary take-profit area, manage positions carefully and avoid closing too early while mo…
#BTC Update: #BTC gave a strong shot above the $80,000 mark approaching the #Resistance area with bullish momentum intact 📈🟢💪. Market still has room to reach that level but a rejection from there remains a real possibility 🔴. Watch closely for how price reacts at the resistance zone — a clean rejection would signal short-term exhaustion while a convincing break above would open the door for a significant continuati…
#US30 UPDATE 📈 : #US30 broke below the previous consolidation range and, importantly, delivered a strong bounce from the support area. This reaction suggests that buyers are still actively defending the zone and that volatility could continue to expand from here. The key level to watch now is 53,500. A successful break and sustained move beyond this level would confirm the breakout and could open the door for furth…
#BTC Update : #BTC closed the week with strong momentum and has now printed a fresh higher high, reinforcing the bullish structure across multiple timeframes. The trend remains firmly in favor of the bulls, and there is currently little reason to step in front of that momentum with countertrend sells. As long as BTC continues to hold its bullish market structure, the key upside levels to watch are $81,500 and $82,2…
#DXY Update: #DXY gave a clean shot below the zone — directly triggering the strong market movement witnessed across crypto and risk assets 📉🔴. Dollar weakness playing out exactly as anticipated with bulls taking full advantage of the breakdown 💪. More upside move yet to come across the broader market if no unexpected news factors interfere — macro tailwind from #DXY weakness remains intact and could continue fueli…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @Pro_CryptoAnalyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pro Crypto Analyst” (@Pro_CryptoAnalyst), 8,979 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Pro_CryptoAnalyst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.