I claimed almost the entire $10,000 reward. Don't miss out—sign up and get yours, too. If you don't trade futures, there's no need for it. Sign Up MEXC
👍3

Channel
@KucoinPumpChannel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,116subscribers
-2,340 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001388375141 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KucoinPumpChannel |
| Description | Check out our past work. Earn money by pumping in 1 minute instead of waiting for months and years ₿ 2027 Bull Don't think about getting rich without risk #Kucoin #Pumps #Pump #Signals #PumpSignals #Trading #Crypto #KucoinPump #KucoinPumps #PumpKucoin |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KucoinPumpChannel |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Rocket_Pump_Network/18122 Jun 2025, 12:02 UTC | @KucoinPumpChannel/3675 · this entry22 Jun 2025, 12:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Rocket_Pump_Network/1848 Aug 2025, 20:17 UTC | @KucoinPumpChannel/3679 · this entry8 Aug 2025, 20:17 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Rocket_Pump_Network/18726 Nov 2025, 02:24 UTC | @KucoinPumpChannel/3684 · this entry26 Nov 2025, 02:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Rocket_Pump_Network/1908 Feb 2026, 21:51 UTC | @KucoinPumpChannel/3687 · this entry8 Feb 2026, 21:51 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @KucoinPumpChannel/3690 · this entry31 Jul 2026, 14:10 UTC | @Rocket_Pump_Network/19231 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Big_PumpSignal/55722 Jun 2025, 12:02 UTC | @KucoinPumpChannel/3675 · this entry22 Jun 2025, 12:02 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Rocket_Pump_Network | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–1) |
| @Big_PumpSignal | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 June 2025 to 31 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @Big_PumpSignal. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 44,116 | -115 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:48 | 44,231 | -72 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:53 | 44,303 | -111 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 44,414 | -75 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 44,489 | -84 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 44,573 | -76 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 44,649 | -108 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 44,757 | -35 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 44,792 | -110 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 44,902 | -67 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 44,969 | -152 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 45,121 | -142 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 45,263 | -74 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 45,337 | -61 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 45,398 | -107 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 45,505 | -91 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 45,596 | -96 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:55 | 45,692 | -148 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 45,840 | -65 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 45,905 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 24 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @KucoinPumpChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2025 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
I claimed almost the entire $10,000 reward. Don't miss out—sign up and get yours, too. If you don't trade futures, there's no need for it. Sign Up MEXC
👍3
⚡️ Trading the pump with small capital? You need MAXIMUM leverage. Binance limits you—MEXC unleashes your trades with the absolute highest leverage in the market! 🚨 Stop giving your profits to Binance fees. Switch to MEXC and claim up to 10,000 USDT. Why hardcore traders are moving to MEXC: ✔️ 0% Maker / 0.01% Taker Fees (Keep your money) ✔️ Up to 500x Leverage on Crypto 🚀 ✔️ Up to 1000x Leverage on Gold & Silver …
👍3
Continue to wait patiently. Markets will bottom out around November 2026.
👍3
Congratulations to everyone who evaluated it. BTC may rise a little more, but we expect it to then drop below $50,000, hit a bottom, and then continue its journey towards its all-time high.
👍3
Bitcoin fell to 62k dollars. There may be a buying opportunity. Consider this.
👍2
I expect a general bottom in crypto this year. I think this will be the year for precious metals (gold, silver, etc.).
BTC will soon experience a sharp decline, followed by a rally. I expect it to drop below $70,000. After that, its price will at least double, and at that point, altcoins will begin their bull run.
👍1
After BTC bottoms out in a few days, it could rally and we could witness a mini altcoin festival in October.
👍1
🤝 MEXC EXCHANGE FEATURES ✔️ KYC not required ✔️ Almost zero commission fees ✔️ You can find many gem coins here ✔️ There are coins that you will profit very high Sign up here to take advantage of the zero commission offer 👇👇👇👇👇 👇 🤝 Sign Up / Register 🤝 🤝 Sign Up / Register 🤝 🤝 Sign Up / Register 🤝 👆👆👆👆👆👆 Click any of the links to sign up for a chance to win a welcome prize ran…
👍2
Ethereum hits all-time high, watch out
ETH has surpassed $4,000, and I expect the market to decline again. Indicators are inflated. This will require a correction.
👍1
This dip is an opportunity. Don't be afraid to buy.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @KucoinPumpChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shall we make a pump soon?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 31 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kucoin Pump Channel | Kucoin Pump Signal | Bitcoin News | Big Pump Signals” (@KucoinPumpChannel), 44,116 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KucoinPumpChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.