Channel
@cryptosignalsoriginal
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
988subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001275479064 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptosignalsoriginal |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptosignalsoriginal |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:34 | 988 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 989 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 994 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 996 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 1,001 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 1,000 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 1,000 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 13 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2025 to 15 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
VIP Trade ID: #R869 Pair: $HIFI/USDT (Binance, ByBit) Direction: LONG -------------------- Position Size: 2 - 4% Leverage : 10X Trade Type: SWING -------------------- Entry: 0.0886 SL: 0.0846 Targets: 0.090 - 0.092 - 0.098 - 0.106 - 0.118 RISK: Medium/High -------------------- Yours truly, Fed. Russian Insiders®
┝🦀〡grasady grasady: And lastly, the only short I'm looking at atm is AAVE Structure looks pretty bad, we swept the highs and are making an efficient move down with ltf sweeps, so we likely get a retest of weekly open at least here. This one is a bit more risky atm, so if btc decides to put some strong closes in we might cut early. Risk accordingly @Grasady Alerts
2025-journal-the-last-dance loma: mention Both Targets Hit - Trade Completed https://www.tradingview.com/x/HqHI81sB/
intraday-plan lsdinmycoffee: alright i need to sleep took a bit more profits on RESOLV and moved SL in profits moved SL below 1h trend, will keep a moonbag because market cap is actually low https://www.tradingview.com/x/9JNb38UY/ TP'ed some SPX6900 scalp too here + stop in profits below 5min EMA trend if you longed when we discussed in market-discussion / twitter BTC looking fine, but not out of the woods either…
📢 Macro Market Update – June 13, 2025 At the moment, we’re navigating a delicate and unstable global environment, largely influenced by the escalating conflict in the Middle East, especially the renewed tensions involving Israel. While this hasn’t yet triggered immediate volatility in crypto markets, historically, geopolitical uncertainty has led to risk-off behavior in global assets and Bitcoin often reacts with v…
2025-journal-the-last-dance loma: mention LAUNCHCOINUSDT - H1 - LONG Entry: $0.185-0.19 Risk: 1% (watch your risk bc lower liquidity) Stop Loss: H1 close below $0.18 Target 1: 0.20 Target 2: 0.218 Chart: https://www.tradingview.com/x/1vVQESLv/
┝⭐〡sherlock sherlockwhale: $TOTAL2 UPDATE ✅ Still at resistance but breaking out of trendline, going to be big with $ETH breaking above $2850. We'll go long as soon as we have a 4H close above the $2850 level. @Sherlock Alerts
┝🏆〡nurse-neil neilarora: CAKE spot hit TP1, move stops BE. Still in RESOLV - going to be making a YouTube video on the markets today, Bitcoin and ethereum at big resistance, but no juice to break it today even after good tarriff talks and CPI coming below expectations isn’t great. So let’s look for some higher lows
trade-ideas-pierre ETH focus pierre_crypt0: ETH D1 Notes on chart. Chart: https://www.tradingview.com/x/eXz1RvRj/ - ETH/USDT - D12
In Last Sunday report predicted a breakout from this diagonal resistance, it happened exactly as promised. Now I watch new ATH levels next
lomas-market-thoughts-and-inner-monologues loma: mention June 10: General: Okay, Bitcoin is at an area where it makes sense to take some profits (assuming we continue ranging for a little while longer). I think that's pretty much in line with what we expected before (de-risk at range highs, take on risk on range lows). Take note of what coins are pumping, then from that list... take note of which coins pumped FIR…
spot-crypto-2025 ACTIVE CRYPTO PORTFOLIO BUILDING MASTERCLASS coldbloodedshiller: I want to say a couple of words here though as I have done in the Tradfi thread just so everyone is aware. 1. The total I am using is my choice, the total you use should be your choice. You don't have to follow with $ values, that's completely down to you. 2. The purpose of this is to show how we build position, structure positions an…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptosignalsoriginal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cryptosignalsoriginal named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Investing” (@cryptosignalsoriginal), 988 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptosignalsoriginal.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.