I know all of you lack attention span and can't read for longer than 2 minutes, But please read this. This will clarify where we are and how you should approach the market. https://x.com/EmperorBTC/status/2114730250500493762?s=20
👍293

Channel
@EmperorbtcTA
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
89,353subscribers
-3,231 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001434370602 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @EmperorbtcTA |
| Description | Price movement analysis and Bitcoin Charts by EmperorBTC. |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/EmperorbtcTA |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 89,353 | -44 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:06 | 89,397 | -28 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:37 | 89,425 | -38 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 89,463 | -33 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 11:58 | 89,496 | -32 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:26 | 89,528 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 89,559 | -28 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 89,587 | -39 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:56 | 89,626 | -44 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 89,670 | -17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:41 | 89,687 | -27 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 89,714 | -30 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:20 | 89,744 | -39 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 89,783 | -63 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 89,846 | -34 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 02:00 | 89,880 | -34 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 89,914 | -36 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 89,950 | -34 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:38 | 89,984 | -63 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 90,047 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 25 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (25 November 2025 – 26 October 2026) |
| Views total | 95,270 |
| Reactions total | 2,419 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 06:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15,720 reactions across 28 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15,720 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,720 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
I know all of you lack attention span and can't read for longer than 2 minutes, But please read this. This will clarify where we are and how you should approach the market. https://x.com/EmperorBTC/status/2114730250500493762?s=20
👍293
I've updated my view on Bitcoin and How I will trade it. Please make note of how I'll position myself because the FOMC here Link - https://youtu.be/PWg3dgcj5Co?si=uK_cVgAvBxc4VrwV
👍227
How to fix trading discipline in 12 minutes. before we start the Journey, I want to tell you that your trading discipline is wrong and you need to change it. I want you to stop reading the 500 page book about trading discipline and just read this for 3 minutes, your discipline method will be in place. Just take this as a thesis and forget everything else you know about trading discipline. Please. Follow this. Try …
👍277
How to grow small account 10X Part - 1. Coming on Youtube Soon.
👍518
BITCOIN CHART UPDATE Saturday's Market Update covered the drop from $86.5k to $80.5k: ETF outflows, FOMC minutes pointing to another hike, and a weak OpenAI headline hitting risk appetite. The ~7% pullback held exactly where it needed to. the HTF range high retest, the nPOC and HTF key S/R. The bullish structure is intact. I'm long from the reclaim of the LTF range VAL at $82.5k, as mentioned in the Market update …
👍339
Most of you are panicking due to this Dump and maybe lost a lot of Money. If you're worried, then this is my opinion on what to do, where to exit and which trades to take. P. S. I'll share my 6 entries every week, Twice a week. Also "How to start Crypto Business" Video coming next week. Leave a 👍 if you're watching Link - https://youtu.be/eR7PDi0Y3gA?si=7KndZymRwZcJ_5Ab
👍765
I will post my trades every 2 days and update you about the market. So please keep notifications ready. No Shitcoins. I will clearly tell you where I am buying, what price action I want to see and explain my reasons. I will also tell you where I'll exit. Today's price update will be released on youtube in about 4 hours. This is simple boring stuff that makes you money. 2-3 trading days a day and make some profit…
👍744
IMPORTANT 🚨 I am starting the 2026 Batch of learning to trade Crypto. Reason for update is 1. Many older tools don't work. 2. Stupid momentum indicators don't work. 3. Trading is a lot easier in cycles but repeating old tools won't work. Please like this if you want to be part of learning to be a Trader. This is for only thode who want to commit and make it a career till retirement. P. S. All my education is free…
👍1,980
PLEASE WATCH. Has Bitcoin Bottomed and should we exit HYPE. Link - https://x.com/EmperorBTC/status/2078130401030418721?s=20
👍219
Please read this carefully, completely and get ready to restart with me from next week.
👍765
How did we perfectly call the top on the previous rally? Just studying the Order Levels. New Market Update Video on • What short trade I'm watching? • How we knew the move up was a complacency bounce and why this could be our final move down? • My thoughts on ZEC, HYPE & NEAR! Link - https://x.com/EmperorBTC/status/2060376522092089773?s=20 P. S. Will also make a new full Video on 'How to Trade Crypto in 2026'. …
👍369
Please watch this and understand the basics of how to analyse a trade. 1. How did we choose our winning long trade 2. Is there a big correction for on the way? 3. Why Z-Cash could be in trouble Link - https://x.com/EmperorBTC/status/2054939901905481894?s=20
👍311
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @EmperorbtcTA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“EmperorBTC Channel” (@EmperorbtcTA), 89,353 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/EmperorbtcTA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.