Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AstronomerZero

Channel

AstronomerZero

@AstronomerZero

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,575subscribers

+232 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002034821368
TypeChannel
Username@AstronomerZero
DescriptionAstronomer Zero's Main TA Hub For more general info/posts: https://twitter.com/astronomer_zero
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/AstronomerZero

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,3379,5759,4567 August 2026 — 9,343 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,343 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,341 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,349 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,350 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,354 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,342 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,337 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,340 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,352 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,370 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,384 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,409 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,450 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,446 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,457 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,494 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,507 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,505 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,516 subscribers23 October 2026 — 9,538 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,541 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,550 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,564 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,575 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +232. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,301–9,611 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 06:309,575+11
1 Nov 2026, 21:469,564+14
29 Oct 2026, 13:099,550+9
26 Oct 2026, 01:369,541+3
23 Oct 2026, 11:589,538+22
20 Oct 2026, 21:569,516+11
18 Oct 2026, 04:079,505-2
15 Oct 2026, 10:009,507+13
12 Oct 2026, 02:389,494+37
5 Oct 2026, 14:559,457+11
27 Sept 2026, 13:359,446-4
18 Sept 2026, 05:219,450+41
14 Sept 2026, 08:419,409+25
10 Sept 2026, 16:419,384+14
5 Sept 2026, 11:189,370+18
1 Sept 2026, 14:349,352+12
29 Aug 2026, 18:539,340+3
27 Aug 2026, 01:249,337-5
24 Aug 2026, 05:129,342-12
20 Aug 2026, 17:139,354first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.8%
avg views ÷ 9,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,190
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held63 (30 July 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total83,820
Reactions total1,099
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 09:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈382
Links
≈1,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,113 reactions across 63 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,13676.2%
👍3668.90%
🔥3017.32%
👏952.31%
🤩862.09%
🎉701.70%
🐳350.851%
💯240.584%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 08:52 UTC≈2,820 views71 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://x.com/astronomer_zero/status/2116815446733213723

❤66🎉5

23 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC≈5,870 views74 reactionsread 5 November 2026

2 W's again, see if we get another one

❤73🔥1

23 Oct 2026, 10:17 UTC≈5,130 views53 reactionsread 5 November 2026

https://x.com/astronomer_zero/status/2113575218459668563

❤53

21 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC≈4,620 views100 reactionsread 5 November 2026

The market bows to our commands.

❤75🔥18👏7

21 Oct 2026, 13:18 UTC≈4,420 views83 reactionsread 5 November 2026

As a reward of expression, for your eternal patience

❤68🔥12🎉3

21 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈4,270 views87 reactionsread 5 November 2026

I want you to hype up the tweet as hard as you can

❤72👍10🔥5

21 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈4,100 views56 reactionsread 5 November 2026

This has been a big target of ours.

❤54🤩2

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @AstronomerZero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

EmperorBTC Channel
@EmperorbtcTA · 89,353
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
CrypNuevo updates 🔨
@CrypNuevoTA · 18,623
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 October 2026
Trader Mayne’s TA
@officialtradermayne · 26,262
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
IONIC XBT
@theionicxbtt · 22,973
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
crash alerts - leverage controllers
@crashalerts · 19,065
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
SolidTradesz 堅固
@solidtradesz · 23,753
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Crypto Chiefs - @chiefrafba
@cryptochiefss · 26,850
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Koroush AK 👁
@koroush_ak_tg · 43,565
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
Dr.Profit 🚀
@Therealdrprofit · 53,863
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AstronomerZero” (@AstronomerZero), 9,575 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AstronomerZero.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.