Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 32 days, net +487. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,304–56,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Sept 2026, 05:16
55,890
-37
4 Sept 2026, 13:38
55,927
-23
2 Sept 2026, 21:45
55,950
-13
1 Sept 2026, 23:15
55,963
-10
1 Sept 2026, 01:49
55,973
+15
31 Aug 2026, 04:08
55,958
-9
29 Aug 2026, 04:13
55,967
-19
28 Aug 2026, 01:47
55,986
+11
27 Aug 2026, 02:08
55,975
+71
25 Aug 2026, 23:54
55,904
-31
25 Aug 2026, 02:34
55,935
+21
23 Aug 2026, 18:03
55,914
-14
22 Aug 2026, 02:17
55,928
+2
20 Aug 2026, 17:44
55,926
+60
19 Aug 2026, 18:22
55,866
+154
18 Aug 2026, 15:13
55,712
+9
17 Aug 2026, 13:45
55,703
+116
16 Aug 2026, 09:05
55,587
+109
14 Aug 2026, 19:16
55,478
-8
13 Aug 2026, 11:47
55,486
first reading
Engagement
50 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.69%
avg views ÷ 55,890 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,410
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.494%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 50 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026
Posts held
50 (28 July 2026 – 9 September 2026)
Views total
178,650
Reactions total
882
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 21:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,420
Videos
≈25
Links
≈2,760
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,232 reactions across 47 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
488
39.6%
👍
244
19.8%
🔥
239
19.4%
🤔
74
6.01%
🐳
69
5.60%
💯
46
3.73%
😱
26
2.11%
🤯
18
1.46%
😍
15
1.22%
🙏
9
0.731%
😭
4
0.325%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC — When Even Long-Term Holders Take Losses, That's the Opportunity
“Long-term holders selling at a loss, with the public paying no attention — an opportunity like this comes around only once every few years.” – Read More
By Crypto Dan | @cryptoquant_official
Bitcoin’s Market Structure Improves, but Spot Demand Still Needs to Confirm the Breakout
“The key test is clear: can spot demand absorb supply and push BTC decisively through $82,000–$83,000” – Read More
By XWIN Japan | @cryptoquant_official
OG Bitcoin Holders Are on the Move
“This consolidation period seems to have introduced some doubt across nearly every type of investor, even the most seasoned ones like the OGs.” – Read More
By Darkfost | @cryptoquant_official
🎙️ New episode of Unbiased is live
David Puell (creator of the Puell Multiple & MVRV Ratio, now at ARK Invest) joins Ben Sizelove and Julio Moreno to talk:
• Why this Bitcoin cycle's bottom didn't follow the usual playbook
• The on-chain markers that actually confirmed capitulation
• September seasonality and the case for one more correction
• The first post-quantum Bitcoin transaction and what it means for BTC'…
Bitcoin's rally toward $80K wasn't quiet.
Spot volume up 3-4x, with Binance capturing the largest share. Whale inflows repeatedly topping 2,000 BTC/hour, average deposit size now 50+ BTC.
Altcoin deposits just tripled, broader participation is back.
→ Dive into the research.
@cryptoquant_official
Whales Still Consider Bitcoin Too Cheap to Take Profits
“Declining selling pressure a still moderate NUPL level and a falling Whale Ratio are supportive for BTC's price.” – Read More
By PelinayPA | @cryptoquant_official
Everything about Bitcoin looks bullish, except the buyers.
Bull Score at 70, price up 24%, but short covering drove the rally, not new demand.
$83K confirms the bull market. Until then, it’s still only a rally.
→ Full report
@cryptoquant_official
11 Months of Suppressed SOPR Just Broke — A Signal of Cycle Reversal
“Profit-taking is showing up on every surge, and yet the market is holding. That is a clear break from the last 11 months.” – Read More
By Crypto Dan | @cryptoquant_official
Why Whales Don't Sell
@CoinRabbit data shows crypto holders borrowed more, not less, as the market turned bearish. Retail loans per user up 74%, and HNWI up 18%.
HNWI also slashed Bitcoin's share of collateral from 57.8% to 30.5%, rotating into ZEC (24.2%, up from outside the top-10).
Retail stayed XRP-led throughout, still the top collateral asset in both cycles.
The takeaway: instead of selling into weakness, h…
Bitcoin Cycle Momentum Signals a Bear Market Reversal
“This signal indicates a high probability that BTC is on track to break out of the downtrend and reverse the bear market.” – Read More
By G a a h | @cryptoquant_official
Our Vibe Quant Community is full of alpha.
One example: a BTC desk-report workflow using CryptoQuant MCP + AI to track price, exchange flows, spot demand, futures, liquidations & divergences.
👉 Join the Discord to build more together.
@cryptoquant_official
Korean Investors are Returning to the Crypto Market
“And much like the Coinbase Premium, the shift from negative to positive territory has typically been followed by a positive trend.” – Read More
By crypto sunmoon | @cryptoquant_official
❤8🔥7👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @cryptoquant_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Glassnode @glassnode · 44,298 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
100eyes Crypto Scanner (PREVIEW) @CryptoScanner100eyes · 31,538 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
CryptoQuant Alert @cryptoquant_alert · 71,256 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Wu Blockchain News @wublockchainenglish · 240,886 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
unfolded. @unfolded · 118,061 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Coin Bureau @CoinBureau · 117,488 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
EmperorBTC Channel @EmperorbtcTA · 91,400 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
CRYPTO TREYSI @cryptotreysi · 34,108 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 3 September 2026
Whale Alert @whale_alert_io · 301,693 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
ICO Analytics (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦) @ico_analytic · 57,282 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 August 2026
WhaleBot Alerts 🐳 @whalebotalerts · 145,067 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
Bitcoin.com News @www_Bitcoin_com · 55,781 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
CryptoCapo TG @CryptoCapoTG · 116,361 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Crypto Daily™ @officialcryptodaily · 42,656 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
ICO Drops - ICO News & Alerts @icodrops · 42,973 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026
Cryptoy ₿ @Cryptoy · 34,621 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Kim & Crypto @kimoncrypto · 37,952 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 31 August 2026
Cointelegraph @cointelegraph · 336,646 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
CryptoBullet @cryptobullet · 67,589 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
CryptoWorldNews @CryptoWorldNews · 42,523 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
CoinMarketCap Announcements @CoinMarketCapAnnouncements · 247,800 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
JustTopIco @JustTopico · 34,157 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@crypto @sniper · 131,272 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 13 August 2026
The Bull @thebull_crypto · 176,069 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 41 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoQuant” (@cryptoquant_official), 55,890 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptoquant_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.