["BTC 골든크로스 임박…USDT 점유율도 강세 신호"] BTC의 50일 이동평균선이 200일선을 상향 돌파하는 '골든크로스'가 임박했다고 코인데스크가 분석했다. 2012년 이후 BTC에서 골든크로스는 총 12차례 발생했으며, 3개월 수익률을 확인할 수 있는 9차례의 평균 상승률은 24.9%였다. 다만 1년 이상 골든크로스가 유지된 사례는 3차례에 불과했다. 코인데스크는 "이번에는 USDT 시가총액 점유율의 50일선이 200일선을 하향 돌파하는 '데드크로스'도 가까워지고 있다. USDT 점유율 하락은 통상 스테이블코인보다 BTC 등 위험자산의 가치가 더 커지고 있다는 의미로, 암호화폐 시장의 위험선호 강화 신호로 해석된다"고 설명했다. -코인니스

Channel
하양이아빠의 암호화폐이야기
@xvgwhitedog2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,702subscribers
-284 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001451111390 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @xvgwhitedog2 |
| Created | 2 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/xvgwhitedog2 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 15,702 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 15,718 | -7 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 15,725 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 15,736 | -18 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 15,754 | -21 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 15,775 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 15,782 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 15,788 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:27 | 15,794 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 15,798 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 15,804 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 15,812 | -6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 15,818 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 15,829 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 15,832 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 15,837 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 15,840 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 15,862 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 15,871 | -7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 15,878 | first reading |
Engagement
636 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.99%
- avg views ÷ 15,702 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 313
- 198 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.326%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 198
- of 636 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 198 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 636 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 61,936 |
| Reactions total | 23 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 41 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 65.3% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 8.16% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.12% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 4.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 636 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 636 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
[단독] 폴리마켓 국내 접속 차단에도…안드로이드서 우회로 다시 열려 https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42804
KB국민은행, JP모건 블록체인망으로 수출입 결제...국내 금융사 최초 https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42801
씨티, 스위프트 블록체인 원장서 실거래...미국 은행 첫 사례 https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42794
🔗 Original | Author Woominkyu "#BTC 레버리지 하락 속 비트코인 상승" 비트코인은 8월 3일부터 9월 2일 사이 63,463달러에서 77,313달러로 상승하며 21.8% 올랐습니다. 미결제약정 역시 221.1억 달러에서 252.5억 달러로 증가했지만, 14.2% 증가에 그쳐 가격 상승 폭에 미치지 못했습니다. 더 주목할 점은, 크립토퀀트의 추정 레버리지 비율(Estimated Leverage Ratio)이 0.262에서 0.221로 15.4% 하락했다는 것입니다. 현재 비율은 180일 범위의 5.6번째 백분위수 근처에 위치해 있어, 파생상품 활동이 증가했음에도 불구하고 트레이더들이 상대적으로 낮은 레버리지를 사용하고 있음을 시사합니다. 이 괴리는 중요한 의미를 갖습니다. 달러 기준 미결제약정은 증가했지만, 그…
🔗 Original | Author Crypto Dan 📈 View Chart "#BTC 11개월간 억눌렸던 SOPR, 마침내 돌파 — 사이클 반전 신호" 2025년 10월 BTC가 12만 달러 고점을 찍고 약세 사이클이 시작됐습니다. 지난 11개월 동안 시장은 단 하나의 메시지만 보내왔습니다. 매도자들은 손실 또는 본전에 팔고 있었습니다. 팔고 싶었던 사람들이 모두 빠져나간 뒤, 비트코인은 7월 58,000달러를 기록했습니다. 사상 최고가의 약 절반 수준, 잠재적 바닥입니다. 그리고 이제, 이 시장을 이끄는 플레이어들이 마침내 움직이고 있습니다. 결정적인 한 방으로 사이클을 약세에서 강세로 전환하려는 시도입니다. 상승할 때마다 차익 실현이 나타나고 있지만, 그럼에도 시장은 버텨내고 있습니다. 지난 11개월과는 확연히 다른 흐름입…
🔗 Original | Author Zizcrypto 📈 View Chart "#BTC 스테이블코인 수요 급등 신호, 식기 시작" 스테이블코인 공급 비율 오실레이터(90일)가 강한 스테이블코인 매수 수요 구간으로 급등했습니다. 오실레이터는 8월 21일 3.74를 기록해 2024년 11월 급등(약 4.00) 수준에 근접하는 고점을 찍었습니다. 이후 오실레이터는 냉각되기 시작했으며, BTC는 77,000달러 부근에서 거래되고 있습니다. 이번 반등이 강한 유동성 충격과 동시에 발생했다는 점에서 중요합니다. 다음 관건은 이 급등이 아니라 지속성 여부입니다. 90일 수치가 계속 하락해 High 구간 아래로 내려온다면, 이 오실레이터의 확인 신호는 약화됩니다. 핵심 시사점: 스테이블코인 측 수요 신호가 급격히 상승했지만, 90일 오실레이터…
민주당 주최 가상자산 과세 점검 토론회 "과세, 정합성·조세형평성 문제…새 체계 필요” https://view.asiae.co.kr/article/2026090310080465646
[알트코인 시즌 지수 33...전일比 11포인트↑] 가상자산 종합 정보 플랫폼 코인마켓캡의 '알트코인 시즌 지수'가 전날보다 11포인트 오른 33을 기록했다. 알트코인 시즌 지수는 시가총액 상위 100개 코인(스테이블·랩트 코인 제외)과 비트코인 간 가격 등락률을 비교해 책정된다. 상위 100개 코인 중 75%의 상승률이 지난 90일 동안 비트코인 상승률보다 높으면 알트코인 시즌, 반대의 경우 비트코인 시즌으로 판단한다. 100에 가까울수록 알트코인 시즌으로 본다. -코인니스
[크립토 '공포·탐욕 지수' 71...탐욕 지속] 암호화폐 데이터 제공업체 코인마켓캡의 자체 추산 '공포·탐욕 지수'가 전날보다 2포인트 하락한 71을 기록했다. 탐욕 단계가 지속되고 있다. 해당 지수는 0에 가까울수록 시장의 극단적 공포를 나타내며, 100에 가까울수록 극단적 낙관을 의미한다. 코인마켓캡의 공포·탐욕 지수는 시가총액 상위 10개 암호화폐의 가격 움직임, 시장 변동성, 풋·콜 비율 등 파생상품 시장, 스테이블코인 공급 비율(SSR), 코인마켓캡 자체 검색 데이터 등을 기준으로 산출된다. -코인니스
[TAC, 익스플로잇으로 블록체인 10일 넘게 중단] TAC 네트워크 중단 사태가 10일 넘게 이어지고 있다. 크립토슬레이트에 따르면 지난 8월 22일(현지시간) 발생한 익스플로잇으로 본딩된 스테이킹 풀(bonded staking pool) 자금이 전부 빠져나갔다. 이후 네트워크는 블록 24,671,475에서 중단됐으며 지금까지도 블록 생성이 재개되지 않은 상태다. TAC 재단은 사후 보고서를 발표, 이번 공격으로 전체 공급량의 28.6%가 스테이킹 담보 풀에서 빠져나갔다며 "다만 전체 TAC 토큰 공급량 자체가 증가하거나 감소한 것은 아니다"라고 설명했다. 재단은 트레저리 리저브를 활용해 12.6억 TAC를 투입해 구제할 계획이다. -코인니스
‘개미’ 팔 때 ‘고래’는 샀다…8월 비트코인 6만개 싹쓸이 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1135343
Showing the 12 most recent of 636 posts we hold for @xvgwhitedog2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@digitalassetnewsroom · 1,99260 posts새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,81443 postsCryptoQuant 한국어🇰🇷
@cryptoquant_kr · 10,30737 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,97319 posts케이씨지 디지털자산/AI/경제 뉴스
@coinkcgchannel · 18,35517 postsLEE의 온체인채널
@LEE_OnChain · 2,53413 posts취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 49,89312 posts쟁글(Xangle) 이벤트 채널
@xangle_official_kr · 12,85610 posts피터팬의 유익한 정보 채널
@coinnewsshop · 6,7008 posts돌비콩의 투자정복
@dolbikong · 9,5924 posts텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,4674 posts불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,9604 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1204 postsJobless investor
@Jobless_investor · 6,0863 posts해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,1553 posts부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,8253 posts에이엠매니지먼트(AM Management)
@AMmanagement · 1,2722 postsAurum Research - 투자 정보 공유
@AurumResearch · 3,2272 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,1392 posts코박 얼럿 (Cobak Alert)
@cobak_alert · 5,2712 posts🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 17,4422 posts마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,7982 postsSoSo 정보 공지
@sosoinfo · 1,8052 posts오렌지 선샤인 🍊☀️
@BREAM50 · 2,9671 postBithumb 빗썸 공식 채널
@BithumbExchange · 14,7821 postDynasty
@Dynastylabs · 6,4531 postFour Pillars Research (KR)
@FourPillarsFP · 3,1221 post로우나의 투자방
@Rowna999 · 13,7071 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,1711 post.dms
@channel_dms · 2,0661 postCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,9581 post조선미래연구소
@cryptobyrdemarty · 4361 postCrypto Dan
@dancoininvestor · 4,3921 post재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,1951 postICO Analytics (StandWithUkraine 🇺🇦)
@ico_analytic · 57,0491 postICOROOTS_Definalist
@icoroots · 5,4851 post[하나 이준호] AI/디지털자산/인터넷/게임
@internetgameLJH · 4,1131 post쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,8371 post인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,6101 post나무위키 실검 알려주는 채널
@namuhotnow · 1,0991 post원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 14,9921 post웹3 & AI 에이전트 광기 연구실
@ryotmadness · 1,9311 post[시그널랩] Signal Lab 리서치
@siglab · 10,8411 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 7,6001 post코인 정보 공유 채널
@yejune1 · 8801 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@coinnesskr · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@blockmedia · 33,565
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@godmulzoo · 22,946
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,319
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 21,207
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@twitchoong · 74,250
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 49,893
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,994
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 37,467
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“하양이아빠의 암호화폐이야기” (@xvgwhitedog2), 15,702 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xvgwhitedog2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.