비트코인 벡터 시그널, 다시 Risk-On 전환 ✅$126K 고점을 잡아냈던 시그널이 비트코인 $70K 돌파와 함께 다시 매수 방향으로 전환 🗂 비트코인 시그널 변화 ⚫2025년 10월 12일 Bitcoin Vector Signal이 Risk-Off로 전환 ⚫당시 비트코인은 약 $126K 고점 형성 후 하락 사이클 진입 ⚫Risk-Off 구간에서 고점 대비 최대 약 -54% 조정 ⚫최근 비트코인이 $70K를 돌파하면서 시그널 다시 Risk-On 전환 🗂 체크 포인트 ⚫Risk-On은 시장 위험선호 환경으로 다시 전환됐다는 신호 ⚫지난 Risk-Off가 고점 부근에서 나왔다는 점에서 이번 재전환도 주목할 만한 구간 ⚫다만 단일 시그널만으로 상승 추세 지속을 확정하기보다는 이후 가격 흐름과 함께 확인 필요 🔄 관련 기사 🗄 Comme…

Channel
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)
@dogeland01
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,207subscribers
-306 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001446671164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dogeland01 |
| Created | 15 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dogeland01 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 21,207 | -8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 21,215 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:55 | 21,224 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 21,239 | -16 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 21,255 | -13 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 21,268 | -18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 21,286 | +1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:38 | 21,285 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:48 | 21,296 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:34 | 21,306 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 21,317 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 21,328 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 21,329 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 21,338 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 21,351 | -10 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 21,361 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 21,373 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 21,380 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 21,379 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 21,393 | first reading |
Engagement
160 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.73%
- avg views ÷ 21,207 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,640
- 43 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.268%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 160 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 160 (2 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 70,453 |
| Reactions total | 133 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 9s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
427 reactions across 108 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 214 | 50.1% | |
| 👍 | 105 | 24.6% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 8.20% | |
| 🤯 | 29 | 6.79% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 4.68% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 3.28% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 2.11% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.234% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
8월 앱 매출 1위는 솔라나, 점유율 38% 기록 ✅8월 전체 앱 매출 $375M 중 솔라나에서만 $143M 발생하며 다른 체인 대비 압도적인 모습 🗂 8월 앱 매출 현황 ⚫솔라나: 앱 매출 약 $143.2M 기록(전체 앱 매출 $375.5M 중 약 38% 차지) ⚫하이퍼리퀴드 L1: 약 $55.6M ⚫이더리움: 약 $47.1M ⚫바이낸스 체인: 약 $34.7M ⚫폴리곤: 약 $20.7M ⚫Base: 약 $15.8M 기록 🔄 관련기사 🗄 Comment 체인 경쟁을 볼 때 TVL이나 거래량도 중요하지만, 결국 실제 유저 활동이 얼마나 매출로 연결되고 있는지도 꽤 중요한 지표인데 8월은 솔라나가 전체 앱 매출의 38%를 가져가면서 확실히 존재감을 보여준 모습 특히 2위인 하이퍼리퀴드 와도 격차가 큰 만큼, 솔라나 생태계 내 실제 경…
Cancore 직접 써보니, 왜 Liquidity OS라고 하는지 알겠음 ✅RWA 프로젝트도 결국 직접 써봤을 때 돌아가는지, 그리고 실제 숫자가 찍히는지가 중요해지는 중 🗂 직접 사용해본 Cancore ⚫처음에는 Canton 기반이라고 해서 사용 과정이 조금 복잡하지 않을까 싶었는데, 직접 들어가보니 지원 네트워크와 자산이 한 화면에서 보여서 생각보다 구조 파악은 쉬웠음 ⚫실제로 스왑까지 진행해보니 Cancore가 말하는 'Canton의 토큰화 자산과 퍼블릭체인 유동성을 연결한다'는 개념도 이해하기 편한 편 ⚫현재 5개 네트워크와 23개 토큰, 250개 이상의 페어 지원 중 🗂 9/3 기준 실제 사용 데이터 ⚫누적 거래량 $28.27M ⚫누적 스왑 69,743건 ⚫누적 매출 약 $357K ⚫이미 라이브로 운영되는 프로덕트에서 실제 …
❤1
RISEx 8월 리캡, 거래량 $7.5B까지 올라왔음 ✅RWA 거래 비중 22%에 활성 계정 1만 개 돌파, 8월은 숫자와 업데이트 둘 다 꽤 많이 쌓인 달 🗂 8월 주요 지표 ⚫누적 거래량 $7.5B, 24시간 최고 거래량 $202M 기록 ⚫누적 활성 계정 10,230개, 일일 활성 사용자 최고 3,580명 ⚫최대 미결제약정(OI) $55.29M ⚫총 TVL $23.22M, 누적 수수료 $2.33M ⚫XLP Vault PnL $910K 기록 🗂 개인적으로 눈에 들어온 건 RWA ⚫누적 RWA 거래량 $1.64B 기록 ⚫전체 거래량의 22%가 RWA에서 발생 ⚫8월에 XAU · XAG · QQQ · SPY · SNDK · SPCX · DRAM · MU · INTC · BL · BZ까지 11종 추가 ⚫최근 온체인에서도 토큰화 주식 거래…
코인만 세금 22%, 주식은 0원…국회 토론회서도 이대로면 안 된다. https://www.coinddak.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=7982
온체인 토큰화 주식 홀더 190만 명 돌파, 한 달 만에 134% 증가 ✅불과 10개월 전 10만 명도 안 됐던 토큰화 자산 홀더가 190만 명까지 빠르게 확대되는 중 🗂 토큰화 주식 시장 현황 ⚫온체인 토큰화 주식 홀더 역대 최고치인 190만 명 기록 ⚫전월 대비 +134% 증가(연초 대비로는 +1,360% 증가) ⚫2025년 11월 7.9만 명 → 2026년 9월 190만 명으로 가파른 성장세 🗂 성장 배경 ⚫SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic 등을 중심으로 IPO 시장에 대한 관심 확대 ⚫동시에 기존 증시 거래시간에 구애받지 않는 24/7 시장에 대한 수요 증가 ⚫솔라나의 주피터가 최근 토큰화 주식 거래 성장에 상당 부분 기여 ⚫주피터 기준 거래량의 61%가 기존 시장 운영시간 외 시간대에서 발생 ⚫활성 토큰화 주식 …
바이낸스 XRP 보유량 5억 개 감소…장기 수급엔 긍정적 신호 ✅거래소 내 XRP 물량이 약 31억 개에서 26억 개 수준까지 감소하며 잠재적 매도 압력 완화 흐름 포착 🗂 바이낸스 XRP 보유량 ⚫바이낸스 XRP 거래소 보유량 약 31억 개 → 26억 개 수준으로 감소 ⚫고점 대비 약 5억 XRP가 거래소 밖으로 이동한 셈 ⚫거래소 보유량 30일 이동평균도 지속적인 하락 흐름 ⚫거래소 내 유통 물량 감소는 일반적으로 잠재적 매도 압력 완화 요인으로 해석 가능 🗂 가격 흐름 ⚫XRP 가격은 현재 차트 기준 약 $1.3 수준 ⚫보유량 감소가 이어졌음에도 단기 가격과 즉각적인 강한 상관관계는 확인하기 어려운 모습 ⚫단기 가격 상승 재료보다는 중장기 수급 변화 관점에서 체크할 데이터 🔄 관련 기사 🗄 Comment 거래소에서 5억 X…
❤1
IBIT, 출시 이후 S&P500 ETF 수익률 추월 ✅비트코인 현물 ETF IBIT가 높은 변동성에도 불구하고 출시 이후 VOO보다 높은 누적 수익률 기록 중 🗂 수익률 비교 ⚫IBIT 출시 이후 가격 상승률 +71.34% ⚫VOO 같은 기간 가격 상승률 +60.93% ⚫배당 포함 VOO 총수익률 +66.06% ⚫IBIT 총수익률 +71.34% ⚫총수익률 기준 IBIT가 VOO 대비 약 5.28%p 우위 🗂 수익률 흐름 ⚫IBIT 연환산 수익률 22.62% ⚫VOO 연환산 수익률 21.17% ⚫다만 IBIT는 VOO와 비교하기 어려울 정도로 큰 변동성을 동반한 흐름 ⚫특히 2025년 고점 이후 큰 폭의 조정을 거쳤음에도 현재 누적 성과는 여전히 VOO 상회 🔄 관련기사 🗄 Comment 결과만 놓고 보면 꽤 의외의 데이터인데,…
❤1
8월에 비트코인, 큰손만 샀다 ✅100 BTC 이상 대형 지갑은 약 6만 BTC를 추가한 반면, 중소형 지갑은 일제히 매도한 모습 🗂 8월 지갑별 비트코인 움직임 ⚫100 BTC 이상 대형 지갑: 약 +60,000 BTC ⚫1~100 BTC 보유 지갑: 약 -33,000 BTC ⚫1 BTC 미만 소형 지갑: 약 -14,000 BTC ⚫대형 지갑은 8월 내내 누적 매수세 유지 ⚫반대로 중·소형 지갑은 지속적으로 물량 축소 🗂 크립토 시장 흐름 ⚫8월 19일 전후 비트코인 가격이 크게 반등하는 구간에서도 대형 지갑 매수세 지속 ⚫월말 기준 대형 지갑과 나머지 지갑 간 누적 포지션 차이 더욱 확대 ⚫결과적으로 8월은 개인·중소형 지갑이 매도한 물량을 대형 지갑이 흡수한 구조가 뚜렷했던 한 달 🔄 관련 기사 🗄 Comment 8월 비트…
❤1
모레노 한국 대표팀 감독 내정
❤2
마이클 세일러 다시 쓸어담았다…스트래티지, 비트코인 4,603개 3억 7천만 달러 매수 https://www.coinddak.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=7937
👍4
업비트 특정금융정보법에 따른 미신고 가상자산사업자와의 입출금 제한 및 유의사항 (2026.08.31 추가)
Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @dogeland01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@realtimebs · 1,4944 posts소브 트레이딩 - State of Bitcoin
@cogall1st · 4,1363 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,5141 post달달한초코btc코인정보/btc/차트분석/자유우파
@FllowYourDreamForsight · 2,6781 post리플XRP초격차 (일반)
@a230502b · 2031 post기묘한 호호밍의 모험
@ananananyong · 1521 post💛 코인으로 만수르되기 💛
@bitmansour · 5001 post비트코인뉴스팡 에어드랍채널
@bitpang · 301 post가봉의 디파이는 다큰낙타
@cctgavong · 2,8411 postCool한 사람들의 Coin정보공유
@coolbitt · 201 post도태되기 싫은 크립토피플
@dotaepeople · 121 post코인짬빱 10년차 brian의 꿀통 큐레이팅
@honeycurator · 31 post쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,8371 postMADANG 크립토
@madang_club · 1921 post원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 14,9921 post고래 입출금 (500억이상) - 코인갤러리
@whalewd · 5611 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@godmulzoo · 22,946
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,994
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@blockmedia · 33,565
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@twitchoong · 74,250
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 23,023
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 37,467
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 49,893
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)” (@dogeland01), 21,207 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dogeland01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.