코빗 web3 월렛 서비스 종료 8월 31일 전에 자산 모두 외부로 출금 하시기 바랍니다 안빼면 국물도 없어잇..!
❤1

Channel
@Bounty_ATM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,514subscribers
-571 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001207079048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bounty_ATM |
| Created | 3 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bounty_ATM |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 25,514 | -47 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 25,561 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 25,574 | -34 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 25,608 | -22 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 25,630 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 25,656 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 25,659 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 25,674 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 25,685 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 25,711 | -23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 25,734 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 25,749 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 25,762 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 25,765 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 25,776 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 25,791 | -26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 25,817 | -57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 25,874 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 25,877 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 25,883 | first reading |
282 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 282 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 71,585 |
| Reactions total | 437 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,186 reactions across 279 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 568 | 47.9% | |
| 👍 | 531 | 44.8% | |
| 🙏 | 32 | 2.70% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 2.28% | |
| 😁 | 25 | 2.11% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.253% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 279 of the 282 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 282 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bounty_ATM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 282 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
코빗 web3 월렛 서비스 종료 8월 31일 전에 자산 모두 외부로 출금 하시기 바랍니다 안빼면 국물도 없어잇..!
❤1
지금 로빈후드 플레이는 크게 3가지 인것 같아요. 1. 밈코 트레이딩 2. 밈코 트레이딩에 자주 쓰이는 주식 페어 예치 (주식토큰-달러) 3. 로빈후드 인프라 (폰즈, 유니스왑, 아비트럼 등) 특히 2번의 경우 안정적인 플레이가 가능하면서, 거래량이 많을수록 수수료도 쏠쏠하니 괜찮을 것 같네요. 특히 유동성이 부족한데 수요가 많을 경우 현물 주식과 가격 차이가 많이 발생하는 경우도 있어서 이 때 매도하면 시세차익도 얻을 수 있고
👍2
✔️Robinhood Chain은 코인이 없다, 그럼 누가 돈 벌고 있을까? Robinhood Chain이 메인넷 출시 2개월 만에 DEX 거래량 $1.5B, TVL 약 $800M까지 성장했습니다. 아직 자체 토큰은 없지만, 이 거래량과 자금이 흘러가면서 직접 수혜를 받는 기존 프로젝트들이 있습니다. 1️⃣$UNI 현재 가장 직접적인 수혜 • Robinhood Chain DEX 거래 대부분을 Uniswap이 처리 • Uniswap 최근 30일 프로토콜 수익 $9.19M 이 중 Robinhood Chain이 $4.36M, 무려 47.4% 차지 • 주식 토큰 거래량도 한 달 만에 약 30배 증가 • Protocol Fee 수익 → UNI 소각으로 연결 • 8월 21일 하루에만 약 15만 UNI 소각 2️⃣$LIT Robinhood의 Per…
👍1
진짜 불장 기대해 봐도 되는거지?
👍2❤1
🌶 고추장 닷컴 가챠 오픈 이벤트 🎰 고추장 닷컴 가챠 오픈 기념! 가챠도 즐기고 USDC 리워드 받아가세요 💰 🎁 참여 리워드 🔸 첫 $5 가챠 참여 고추장 닷컴에서 처음으로 $5 가챠에 참여하면 → $2 USDC 지급! 🔸 5회 참여 달성 이벤트 기간 동안 가챠에 총 5회 참여하면 → $5 USDC 지급! 🎰 한 번 참여하면 $2 USDC, 🔥 5회 참여하면 $5 USDC 리워드! 📌 이벤트 기간 9/3(목) ~ 9/13(일) 밤 23: 59 까지 👉🏻 고추장닷컴 바로가기 👉🏻 고추장 닷컴 가챠 바로가기 📌 유의사항 이벤트 리워드는 중복 참여가 불가하며, 참여 횟수에 따라 1회 또는 5회 참여 기준 중 하나만 적용됩니다. 따라서 1인당 최대 지급 가능한 리워드는 $5 USDC입니다. D3 고추장 닷컴의 가챠 오픈을 기념해 준…
❤4👍2
이번 주 토요일 여의도 불꽃축제 명당찾기 사이트 9월 5일에 여의도에서 서울세계불꽃놀이 하는데 명당을 표시해둔 사이트를 누가 만들어놨네요 보러가실분들은 참고하기 좋을듯 spotts.kr/firework
❤2👍2
FLOP AMA 요약 🔍 어제 새벽 FLOP AMA에서 토크노믹스와 추후 진행 방향에 대한 언급이 있었습니다. AMA 내용 요약 🎚️ 🟢프리세일, VC 배분 없음, 10년 누적 공급 토큰양은 172억 🟢파밍 유저 에어드랍 비중이 가장 높음 🟢테스트넷은 4분기 90일 간 진행 🟢DID 보유자(에이전트)만 Faucet에서 테스트 FLOP 수령 🟢테스트 토큰을 모으기만 한다고 에어드랍이 있는 것은 아님 🟢Inference에서 토큰 사용해야 에어드랍 할당됨 🟢메인넷에서도 활동해야 에어드랍 락업 해제 🟢단순 에이전트 관련 포스팅이나 DID 대량 생성은 필요 X 🟢에이전트 간의 상호작용 + 실사용이 관건 🟢최소 GPU, 하드웨어만 충족되면 마이닝에는 차이가 없음 🟢Technocore는 에이전트 협업 레이어로 작동 예정 🟢KOL은 팔로워 수보다 실제 …
👍2❤1
지금 로빈후드가 가스비로 하루에 50억 씩 버는데 이렇게 1년 벌면 약 1.8조를 범. (50*365) 근데 로빈후드 2025년 영업 이익이 2.64조임. 이거 너무 노다지 사업인데 ㅋㅋㅋ
❤3👍3
금따라간다..?
😁3
붉은사막, 설치 없이 20분 데모플레이 가능 붉은사막 데모를 설치 없이 브라우저에서 바로 할 수 있게 풀었음 Twitch 링크만 열면 20분 동안 플레이 가능 어떤 게임인지 알기에는 충분한 데모라고 생각되네요 이렇게 용량, 사양이 높은 게임을 무설치로 할 수 있게 되는건 기술발전 미친듯 붉은사막 데모 바로가기
👍1
ㄹㅇ 이게 남얘기가 아님..
❤2🔥2👍1
트위터 해킹이 심상 찮네요 2중보안 까지 꼭해두세요 자칫했다간 힘들게 키워둔 X 계정 홀라당 날라갑니다 • 더보기 - 설정 및 개인정보 • 보안 및 계정 접근 권한 • 보안 • 추가 비밀번호 보호 체크 추가 비밀보호 체크 해두면 비밀번호를 재설정시 이메일 주소 또는 휴대폰 번호로 한번더 체크 해줍니다 즉, 누군가 트위터 비밀번호를 바꾸려는 시도를 할경우 추가 인증으로 막을수 있다는것 https://x.com/nikitabier/status/2094776000374849979 #보안
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 282 posts we hold for @Bounty_ATM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 83 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“에어드랍ATM” (@Bounty_ATM), 25,514 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bounty_ATM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.