Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 크립토마카세

Channel

크립토마카세

@cryptomacase

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,090subscribers

-74 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600146222
TypeChannel
Username@cryptomacase
Created30 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held19
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptomacase

Growth

11,09011,16411,1276 August 2026 — 11,164 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,164 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,162 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,148 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,144 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,128 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,124 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,121 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,106 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,094 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,091 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,094 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,093 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,090 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
19 measurements spanning 22 days, net -74. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,079–11,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 15:1611,090-3
26 Aug 2026, 16:2211,093-1
25 Aug 2026, 14:5811,094+3
23 Aug 2026, 00:0911,091-3
20 Aug 2026, 17:4611,094-9
19 Aug 2026, 19:4211,103-3
18 Aug 2026, 19:5611,106-15
17 Aug 2026, 19:5911,121-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:0311,124-4
15 Aug 2026, 12:3611,128-5
14 Aug 2026, 01:1711,133-11
11 Aug 2026, 18:2111,144-4
10 Aug 2026, 16:0511,148-3
9 Aug 2026, 13:2111,151-11
8 Aug 2026, 14:2611,162+11
7 Aug 2026, 17:4511,151-3
6 Aug 2026, 20:3111,154-10
6 Aug 2026, 02:3611,164no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0311,164first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.78%
avg views ÷ 11,090 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.974%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
92
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 August 2026
Posts held92 (3 August 202625 August 2026)
Views total99,734
Reactions total971
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

865 reactions across 82 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍76988.9%
708.09%
😱91.04%
🤔50.578%
🙏40.462%
😈30.347%
🥰30.347%
🔥20.231%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 25 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC732 views11 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

미국-이란 휴전 합의 임박 보도 미국과 이란이 휴전 협정에 합의한 것으로 전해졌으며 조만간 공식 발표가 나올 것으로 예상된다고 러시아 국영통신 RIA 노보스티가 파키스탄 및 이란 군 소식통을 인용해 보도 보도에 따르면 이번 합의에는 호르무즈 해협의 자유로운 항행 보장과 이슬라마바드 메모랜덤에 따른 협상 재개가 포함된 것으로 알려다고 하네요 다만 현재까지 미국과 이란 정부 모두 해당 합의를 공식 확인하지 않았다는데 지금까지 비슷한 내용으로 기사 한 100개쯤 본것같은데 작작하길.. 나오고 일단 유가는 하락하는 중이네용

👍91🤔1

25 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC646 views9 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

코인베이스 이더리움 프리미엄 드디어 양전 좀 멋진 상승 보여줄 수 없나요 😮‍💨

👍71🙏1

25 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC664 views11 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

레이어제로 올 가을 기관용 블록체인 거래소 ATLAS 출시 예정 아이고 이런거에도 10%를 못올리네 비트야 그만해라 😭😭

👍91🙏1

25 Aug 2026, 04:55 UTC813 views11 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

전설적인 투자자 드러켄밀러, 미국 국채 금리 정책 비판 드러켄밀러가 이번에 <정부가 금리를 억지로 낮추려 하지 말고, 채권시장이 금리를 결정하게 둬야 한다> 고 재무부의 장기국채 정책을 강하게 비판했네용 - 재무부는 장기국채 바이백 규모를 회당 20억 달러 => 최소 40억 달러로 확대 - 이는 단순한 유동성 관리가 아니라 장기금리 상승을 억제하려는 조치 - 당시 국채 경매나 시장 거래에 뚜렷한 이상 징후가 없었는데 왜 개입했는지 모르겠음 - 인플레이션이 여전히 목표치 이상이고 재정적자가 GDP의 약 6%, 국가부채가 40조 달러를 넘는 상황 => 높은 국채 금리는 미국의 재정 리스크를 반영한 정상적인 시장 가격 - 특히 장기국채를 사들이면서 단기 국채 발행으로 자금을 조달하면 시장의 듀레이션 리스크를 정부가 흡수하는 것 - 이는 사실상

👍82🤔1

24 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC682 views15 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneybottle

베센트가 알아서 해결할거라 했습니다 우리가 아는걸 그들이 모르지 않습니다 하이닉스가 가야할 길도 정해져있습니다 소식통에 따르면 BESSENT가 국채 재무일반계정(TGA) 약 1조 달러를 활용해 채권 매입 자금을 마련할 수 있을 것이라고 함

👍13🤔2

24 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC≈3,730 views15 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

이번 상승에 윈터뮤트는 계속해서 숏포지션 늘리는 중 현재 숏포지션만 $190.77M 들고있다고 하네요 • $ETH - $53.02M • $BTC - $30.66M • $SOL - $22.62M • $HYPE - $11.43M • $XRP - $10.19M 이더리움 숏 뭐냐? 최근 며칠 현물도 계속 넣더니 사람이 아니구나 😮‍💨😮‍💨😮‍💨

👍122🙏1

24 Aug 2026, 04:59 UTC972 views19 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

상승장이라도 밋업은 가야겟죠? 히바치 밋업 화리 5장 받아왔네요! 😏 지갑 주소 받고있어서 빠르게 신청해보시죠! 루마 신청하고 구글폼 제출하면 끝! - 일정 : 9월 1일 (화) 18시 ~ 21시 - 주최 : Ethene Labs, Hibachi - 특이사항 : 지갑주소를 받음 😏 루마 바로가기

👍172

22 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC≈4,060 views8 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

에릭트럼프 "본인이나 트럼프 측에서 새로운 코인을 출시한다는 주장은 다 사기다" 공식이니 믿어도 될까요? 나오는 게 더 짜증나..

👍62

21 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,580 views10 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

BofA "30년물 5% 아래 못 내리면 위험자산 매도 압력▲▲" 만약 미국 재무부의 채권시장 안정화 시도가 실패해서 미국 30년물 국채금리를 5% 아래로 낮추지 못할 경우 위험자산 전반에 매도 압력이 커질 수 있다고 하네용 현재 미국 30년물 금리는 재무부의 개입에도 불구하고 약 5.2% 수준 유지 중이며 미국 정부부채 증가가 장기 국채금리에 지속적인 상승 압력을 주는 중이라고 하네요 이와같은 상황이 지속될 경우 - 달러 약세 가능성 - AI 하이퍼스케일러(빅테크) 숏 포지션 증가 - 프라이빗 크레딧 및 금융주 약세 등이 나타날 수 있다고 하는데 인플레이션 헷지 자산 비트코인 좀만 더 힘내줄 수 있을까요? 😢

👍91

21 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC≈1,650 views8 reactionsread 27 August 2026

근데 이거 진짜 조금 그런 게 단순 트럼프 쉴링 보다도 베센트가 장기 국채 바이백을 확대해서 장기금리를 누르고 장기물 부담을 완화하려는 움직임이 시장의 유동성+금융여건 완화 기대감을 자극하면서 수혜를 받은 측면이 더 큰 것같은데 (그래서 금이랑 같이 오름) 다만 재정조달이 단기 채권에 더 의존하게 될 경우 단기금리와 인플레이션에는 오히려 부담이 될 수 있기 때문에 과연 이 효과가 얼마나 지속될지는 의문,, 인플레이션 헷지 자산 비트코인 화이팅 😭

👍8

21 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC849 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Forwarded from @doratman18

코인 10년 한 나름 짬밥있는 사람으로서 역사적으로 이 정도 크기의 비트 양봉 나온 중에서 가장 내러티브가 별로임 = 안 와닿는다는 뜻 원래 그냥 오르는게 젤 무섭긴한데

👍6

21 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC≈1,350 views8 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

와 트위터에서 주급 260만원 받은 사람 출처 1. 딱 하루 500만 이상 터짐 + 2주 내내 매일 100만 이상 노출 2. 댓글에 대한 답글을 거의 즉시 달았음 3. 하루 평균 게시글은 20개 정도 4. 하루 평균 나의 답글은 300-500개 꾸준히 하다보면 크게 터지는 날이 있는데 그 날 이후로 파도를 잘 타서 끝까지 잘 노출이 나와주도록 좀 신경을 써야 한다고 하네요… 이게 일이 되면 솔직히 재미없던데 트위터에서 주급 받아가시는 분들 너무 대단하신 느낌..

👍61😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @cryptomacase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 130,692 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 70,198
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 38,703
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 50,352
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,552
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
New Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 55,953
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“크립토마카세” (@cryptomacase), 11,090 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomacase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.