난야테크놀로지, 8월 매출 사상 최고치 • 8월 매출: 446억 9,000만 대만달러 • 전월 대비 +1.88%, 전년 대비 +560.85% • 1~8월 누적 매출: 2,201억 9,400만 대만달러, 전년 대비 +638.19% 전년 기저가 낮았다는 점을 감안해도 월 매출은 1년 만에 6.6배, 누적 매출은 7.4배로 불어난 것으로, DRAM 업사이클의 강도를 그대로 보여주는 폭발적인 실적. 출처: Nanya Technology
❤1

Channel
@moneybottle
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,553subscribers
+287 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001319564729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moneybottle |
| Created | 8 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moneybottle |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 15,553 | +11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 15,542 | -8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:02 | 15,550 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 15,551 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 15,550 | +77 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 15,473 | -12 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 15,485 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:18 | 15,483 | +5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:04 | 15,478 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:27 | 15,486 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:07 | 15,495 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:23 | 15,499 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:12 | 15,511 | +19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:57 | 15,492 | +63 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 15,429 | +18 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:17 | 15,411 | +20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:13 | 15,391 | +34 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 15,357 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 15,356 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 15,357 | first reading |
388 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 125 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 388 (4 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 356,916 |
| Reactions total | 1,512 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4,438 reactions across 348 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,375 | 53.5% | |
| 👍 | 704 | 15.9% | |
| 🔥 | 276 | 6.22% | |
| 🤨 | 140 | 3.15% | |
| 👏 | 109 | 2.46% | |
| 😁 | 108 | 2.43% | |
| 💯 | 100 | 2.25% | |
| 🍾 | 99 | 2.23% | |
| 👀 | 93 | 2.10% | |
| 😐 | 58 | 1.31% | |
| 😇 | 56 | 1.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 0.991% | |
| 🫡 | 42 | 0.946% | |
| 😴 | 37 | 0.834% | |
| 🆒 | 35 | 0.789% | |
| 💋 | 28 | 0.631% | |
| 🐳 | 23 | 0.518% | |
| 🤗 | 19 | 0.428% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 0.406% | |
| 👌 | 17 | 0.383% | |
| 9 further kinds | 57 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 371 of the 388 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,692 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 388 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @moneybottle. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 388 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
난야테크놀로지, 8월 매출 사상 최고치 • 8월 매출: 446억 9,000만 대만달러 • 전월 대비 +1.88%, 전년 대비 +560.85% • 1~8월 누적 매출: 2,201억 9,400만 대만달러, 전년 대비 +638.19% 전년 기저가 낮았다는 점을 감안해도 월 매출은 1년 만에 6.6배, 누적 매출은 7.4배로 불어난 것으로, DRAM 업사이클의 강도를 그대로 보여주는 폭발적인 실적. 출처: Nanya Technology
❤1
노동부 지침 못 박았다…“성과급 N%·호남반도체 반대 파업 불가” 최근 대기업 노사 갈등의 쟁점으로 떠오른 ‘영업이익 연동형 성과급(영업이익의 N% 지급 요구)’은 노사 간 자율 협의는 가능하지만 의무적 교섭 및 조정·쟁의 대상은 아니라고 못 박았다. 영업이익은 투자와 주주 배당, 법인세 등의 원천으로, 이를 특정 비율로 사전 배분하라는 요구는 주주 권익을 침해하고 경영의 자유를 본질적으로 제약한다는 판단이다. https://naver.me/Ix0Ap7zd
❤🔥11❤7
강남 치폴레 근황
❤15😁5
중국은 국가 자본과 정책을 총동원해 창신메모리(CXMT)를 키우며 한국 메모리 반도체를 무섭게 추격하고 있습니다. 그런데 한국은 초격차를 벌려도 모자랄 판에 호남 반도체를 밀어붙이고, 한전은 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스에 5년치 전기요금 25조 원 선납까지 제안하고 있습니다. 여기에 민주당은 노란봉투법까지 통과시켰고, 노조는 파업한다고 협박하며 연 100조 원에 가까운 성과급을 뜯어간 상황입니다. 글로벌 경쟁자는 국가가 자본과 정책으로 뒤에서 밀어주는데, 우리는 기업이 기술 경쟁은 물론 정치권의 압박과 노조 리스크까지 동시에 감당해야 합니다. 반도체는 한번 주도권을 내주면 다시 되찾기가 정말 어려운 산업입니다. 중국과의 격차를 더 벌려도 모자랄 시기에, 기업의 발목을 잡는 정치가 오히려 가장 큰 리스크가 되고 있으니 참 답답합니다. htt…
❤10🐳6
[단독] 美 운용사, 솔리다임 ETF 선등록…IPO 시계 빨라지나 SK하이닉스의 낸드플래시 손자회사 솔리다임이 미국 증시에 상장할 것이라는 기대감이 현실화되고 있다. 이미 미국 현지에선 솔리다임 주가를 기초 자산으로 한 금융상품이 잇달아 등장하고 있다. 3일 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)에 따르면 테마스 ETF 트러스트(Themes ETF Trust)는 지난달 13일 솔리다임 주가에 연계한 ETF 3종 ▲Leverage Shares 2X Long Solidigm Daily ETF ▲Leverage Shares 2X Short Solidigm Daily ETF ▲Leverage Shares 1X Short Solidigm Daily ETF의 출시를 위한 등록신고서를 제출했다. https://www.bloter.net/news/articleV…
대재명 부동산 정책 일부 롤백 역시 부동산 펌핑은 민주당
👍7❤3
용혜인이 장관으로서 부적격한 이유는 선거의 비례성 제고라는 민주적 취지로 도입된 제도를 당리당략의 수단으로 악용한 데 있다. 위성정당을 통해 거리낌 없이 두 번이나 비례대표로 국회의원 자리에 오르며 민주주의의 원칙을 스스로 파괴했다는 점에 있다. 불공정과 특권, 특혜의 화신이라 할 수 있다. 취업이라는 바늘구멍을 통과하기 위해 오늘도 노심초사하고 있을 이 땅의 수많은 청년들에 비해 용혜인에게 인생이란 얼마나 하찮고 손쉬운 일이었겠는가. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/029/0003046000?sid=100
👍14❤1
저 머니보틀도 제안합니다 삼전 하닉에서 5년간 낼 법인세를 면제해주세요 정부에 세금내도 용혜인이랑 민주당이 다 갖다 쓸텐데 그 돈으로 바이백을 합시다 영광스러운 코스피 3만시대를 이루어냅시다
🔥20❤5
[단독] 삼성전자 20조·하이닉스 5조… 정부, 5년치 전기료 선납 제안 https://naver.me/574LZ7Hv
😐10🤨3👀2🔥1😴1
하이닉스 1억가기 딱 좋은 날이죠 어제 브로드컴 실발 후에도 오르는걸 보니 드디어 반도체 턴이 온 것 같습니다 횡보는 길고 인내는 고되지만 그 끝에 있을 과실은 그 무엇보다 달콤하고 값질것입니다 제가 약속드립니다 하이닉스 1억! 아주 빠르게..
👍11😐2❤1🙏1
저는 금리 오른다고 시장을 비관적으로 보지 않습니다 긍정 마인드를 가지셔야 돈을 법니다 긍정 마인드: 금리가 높네? 앞으로 떨어질 금리가 많구나! 롱이다 부정 마인드: 매크로가 안좋으니 9월은 조심해야겠당…
❤20
GPT Astra 내일 출시될 확률이 높아보입니다 여지껏 출시일 모두 정확히 맞춘 사람이 내일 나온다고 하네요
🔥5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 388 posts we hold for @moneybottle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
하이닉스 연말 가격 예상
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 388 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 69 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“머니보틀” (@moneybottle), 15,553 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moneybottle.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.