* 코스닥 대표기업 키운다…"셀렉트 시총, 전체 3분의 1 수준 예상" - 최지우 한국거래소 코스닥시장본부 상무는 6일 서울 여의도 금융투자교육원에서 열린 한국재무학회 특별 정책심포지엄에서 셀렉트 규모에 관한 질문에 “코스닥150보다 종목 수를 더 줄여서 구성하려고 한다”며 편입 기업의 합산 시가총액으로 코스닥 전체의 약 3분의 1을 예상한다고 말했다. 그는 셀렉트 도입 취지에 대해 “코스닥 시장에서 대표 기업을 육성하자는 것”이라며 “궁극적으로는 코스피와 경쟁하자는 것”이라고 설명했다. 거래소는 셀렉트로 자금이 쏠릴 가능성에 대비해 일반 코스닥 기업에 대한 보완책도 논의하고 있다. 최 상무는 “벤처업계와 코스닥 상장기업들이 일반 코스닥의 낙인 효과나 셀렉트로 자금이 쏠리는 문제를 많이 우려하고 있다”며 일반군에 시장 자금이 충분히 유입되…

Channel
호그니엘
@hogniel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,362subscribers
+203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001301601966 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hogniel |
| Created | 18 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 56 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hogniel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:01 | 15,362 | +16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:37 | 15,346 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:35 | 15,342 | +10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 16:35 | 15,332 | +8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:45 | 15,324 | +42 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 14:31 | 15,282 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 15,287 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 15,289 | -4 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 12:59 | 15,293 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:49 | 15,297 | -5 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 15,302 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:47 | 15,301 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:46 | 15,294 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 15,300 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:28 | 15,306 | -3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:19 | 15,309 | +1 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 15,308 | -2 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 15,310 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:01 | 15,309 | +10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 15,299 | first reading |
Engagement
869 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.4%
- avg views ÷ 15,362 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,750
- 145 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.4%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 145
- of 869 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 145 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 869 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 253,327 |
| Reactions total | 639 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈12,800
- Videos
- ≈1,280
- Links
- ≈28,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 8m 42s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,507 reactions across 461 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 607 | 17.3% | |
| 👍 | 508 | 14.5% | |
| 🤮 | 356 | 10.2% | |
| 🖕 | 346 | 9.87% | |
| 😁 | 279 | 7.96% | |
| 🤬 | 211 | 6.02% | |
| 🥰 | 142 | 4.05% | |
| 🤣 | 130 | 3.71% | |
| 😭 | 127 | 3.62% | |
| 👎 | 126 | 3.59% | |
| 💩 | 89 | 2.54% | |
| 🔥 | 82 | 2.34% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 1.77% | |
| 😱 | 51 | 1.45% | |
| 💯 | 35 | 0.998% | |
| 🤔 | 35 | 0.998% | |
| 🍌 | 29 | 0.827% | |
| 👌 | 29 | 0.827% | |
| 🤩 | 27 | 0.77% | |
| 🤡 | 23 | 0.656% | |
| 29 further kinds | 213 | 6.07% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 511 of the 869 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,644 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 869 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 145 posts held from the last 30 days (4.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
>>테슬라, Cybertruck 생산 종료 결정…머스크, 로봇·AI로 자원 전환 •테슬라는 2027년 중반부터 Cybertruck 생산을 단계적으로 중단하고 Cybercab 생산을 확대할 계획임. 판매 부진과 잦은 리콜 영향으로 올해 1~3분기 Cybertruck 판매량은 전년비 28% 감소한 1만1,600대에 그쳤음. 테슬라는 향후 Cybercab, Optimus, 전기 대형트럭 Semi에 집중하며 사업을 AI와 자율주행 중심으로 전환 >特斯拉宣布终止Cybertruck生产,马斯克将资源转向机器人与AI赛道 https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3785379#from=ios
만듬
거래소 "코스닥 전 상장사 연 1회 IR 의무화 추진…미이행 시 제재" https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4443548
👍4👏1
삼양식품은 금번 컨콜에서 가격인상 가능성을 열어둔 점이 의미있었던 것 같습니다. 추가 증설 발표가 나오나 했는데, 아쉽게도 증설 발표는 따로 없었네요. 아직 사이트를 다각적으로 검토하고 있다고 하셨습니다. 공사 기간이 통상 3년 정도 걸리는데 이보다 빨리 지을 수 있는지도 검토 사항이라고 언급 주셨습니다. 관세 환입 제외하면 약 1,800억원 수준으로, 3분기에 유럽쪽 거래선 조정과 일부 출항 지연등 이슈가 있었던 점을 감안하면 매우 선방했습니다. 타 업체대비 환율로 인항 영업이익 영향은 상당히 선방했습니다. (기존 컨센 부합) 환율이 많이 빠졌는데요, 미국, 중국 중심 수량 성장으로 매출 QoQ 성장했습니다. ⚡️삼양식품 3Q26P Re 매출액 7,918억원 (YoY 25.3%, QoQ 2.8%) 영업익 1,962억원 (YoY 4…
❤1
[급락코멘트] 모르는 걸 알게 되거나, 몰라도 될 때까지 [Web발신] [급락코멘트] 모르는 걸 알게 되거나, 몰라도 될 때까지 안녕하세요, KB증권 주식전략 김민규입니다. - 알려진 안 좋은 것 보다 모르는 게 더 악재라는 걸 보여주는 급락입니다. 규제가 있을 것 같은데 어느 정도일지 모른다는 불안이 급락을 키웠는데, 2018년 트럼프 1기 중간선거 직후와 비슷하고 다른 부분도 있습니다. 2018년은 연말까지 높은 변동성, 2019년 연초부터 반등했습니다. - 2018년은 통화정책이 가장 영향이 컸는데, 현재는 규제의 영향이 가장 큽니다. 둘 다 악재지만 시장의 반응방식이 다릅니다. 연준에 대한 기대와 실망은 FOMC가 끝나면 다 반영되기에 증시도 2019년 1월 V자로 반등했지만, 지금의 ‘모른다’는 불확실성은 안다고 느껴질 때까지 …
https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/024/0000109433?sid=101
👍18
2026.11.06 15:38:28 기업명: 삼양식품(시가총액: 9조 1,903억) A003230 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 7,918억(예상치 : 8,052억/ -2%) 영업익 : 1,962억(예상치 : 1,829억/ +7%) 순이익 : 898억(예상치 : 1,382억/ -35%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.3Q 7,918억/ 1,962억/ 898억 2026.2Q 7,703억/ 1,762억/ 1,375억 2026.1Q 7,144억/ 1,771억/ 1,445억 2025.4Q 6,377억/ 1,392억/ 956억 2025.3Q 6,320억/ 1,309억/ 1,100억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20261106800605 종목공시 : h…
확실히 대만이 캉코쿠보단 금융선진국이네영
https://www.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?newsId=05195526645643096&mediaCodeNo=257&utm_source=naver&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=news_syndication&utm_content=original_article
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
😁11🖕5
Showing the 12 most recent of 869 posts we hold for @hogniel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@hedgehara · 19,5938 posts묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7286 posts돌다리🚦
@stbridgee · 4,6355 posts지식 책꽂이 (이대호 기자)
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,3824 posts미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,8193 posts재테크야간자율학습🌗
@capitalmosquito · 4,2512 posts간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,5392 postsFOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,3852 posts재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,2242 postsMZ타뇽 긴축모드 ON
@mztanyong · 6,0722 posts역발상 기개세
@nifaxiang · 1272 posts주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini · 4,7291 post오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,0901 postITM. IDEATOMONEY
@ToEllisIsland · 2,0411 post8기통 풀악셀
@V8foreverz · 5291 postYeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,4691 post뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,6771 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0961 post가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1281 post서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,3701 post기다림의 미학(정성적 스토리)
@fomotoo · 1381 post프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7141 postFund Easy 잡담모드
@fundeasy_choi · 10,8321 post개미굴 - 햇제 팝업스토어
@gaemigool · 1,6601 post가투방(DCTG) 저장소
@gatubang · 14,5471 post습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,2811 postTrends & Tips 😎⚡️
@honeylifetip · 9,3821 post메모장
@idea_memo · 8,9771 postKael Playground
@kaelresearch · 3,5051 post김현석(자본주의 바이어스 있는 채널입니다)
@kimu_nim · 7,7061 post우드스탁
@nangmanjurin · 3081 post8:45
@noblue777 · 441 post힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1511 post제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,7811 post고봉밥의개똥곳간
@skankinben · 4,0751 post팔칠사공스토너 실전투자 인사이트
@stoner8740 · 10,8901 post🌈 퀀텀백의 idea for Tech 🌈
@trendinvestment · 2891 post부의 나침반
@w_compas · 4,9171 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 135 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@darthacking · 65,59627 posts습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117 · 28,28115 posts하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,27210 posts텐렙
@Ten_level · 17,00510 posts묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7289 posts다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,1048 posts에이프릴바이오 공식IR채널: 리레이팅 2026
@aprilbioipr · 4,3967 posts미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,8197 posts루팡
@bornlupin · 49,1956 posts[한투증권 로보틱스 | 최건]
@kis_robotics · 4,3986 posts🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 41,8226 posts[메리츠 Tech 김선우, 양승수, 김동관]
@merITz_tech · 24,6966 posts여의도스토리 Ver2.0-习近平是个狗东西
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,0175 posts선수촌
@athletes_village · 22,1235 postsPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,5935 posts스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,8215 posts한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,6694 posts요약하는 고잉
@one_going · 48,0544 posts돌다리🚦
@stbridgee · 4,6354 posts64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,5603 postsBad Onion 나쁜양파
@Badonions · 4,7403 posts급등일보 미국주식🇺🇸 속보·매크로·리서치
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,9903 postsWave Research
@Wave_Research · 1,9683 posts카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,0673 posts가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1283 postsDAJU - 기업 공시
@daju_dart · 4,5713 posts프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,7143 posts도널드 J. 트럼프 대통령
@goddessTTF · 14,4313 posts여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8043 posts머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,7333 posts제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,7813 posts퀀텀 알고리즘
@quantum_ALGO · 7,6113 posts타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,9463 postsCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,1433 posts스핀 - 공개방
@trading_spin · 2,6823 posts지엘리서치_ 독립리서치
@valjuman · 7,2393 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,3722 postsD의 테크 투자
@DrDtech · 2,8792 posts오를주식 - 뉴스/경제/주식
@GoUpstock · 21,0902 postsAI 리서치 딥다이브_Seoul to Wall St.
@aicorporateanalysisdeepdive · 5,7242 posts다올 의료기기/화장품 박종현
@alexppark · 8,5972 posts알테오젠 IR
@alteogenIR · 9,7792 posts엘앤에프 & 2차전지 이야기
@battery4454 · 3,0092 posts문벵이의 배터리/로봇 투자
@battery_invest · 2,0152 posts돼지바
@bbong_tta · 12,8752 posts딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,1302 posts[하나 Global ETF] 박승진
@globaletfi · 20,5622 posts💻반도체 소부장💻[그로쓰리서치]
@growth_semi · 8,6582 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Wave_Research · 1,9683 posts💻반도체 소부장💻[그로쓰리서치]
@growth_semi · 8,6582 postsTNBfolio
@TNBfolio · 25,1292 posts🌱받밭🌱
@batbat_field · 3,3681 post투자자문 와이즈리서치 경제공부방
@econostudy · 8,4351 post하나증권/에너지화학/윤재성
@energy_youn · 11,0331 post하나 미래산업팀(스몰캡)
@hanasmallcap · 15,7451 post실시간 역외 첩보망 PRO
@hyperspect · 4,7121 postJUMP_시그널
@jump_signal · 4341 post[한투증권 로보틱스 | 최건]
@kis_robotics · 4,3981 postMarket News Feed
@marketfeed · 39,6701 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@athletes_village · 22,123
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,071
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,524
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@ym_research · 39,858
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,371
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@mistergray_11 · 19,767
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@SmallCap · 23,020
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 19 September 2026
@kimcharger · 25,226
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,111
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,885
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@easobi · 23,370
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,990
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,017
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@GoUpstock · 21,090
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 36,989
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,946
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,469
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@bornlupin · 49,195
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,596
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@bufkr · 21,623
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,253
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,092
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,253
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,394
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“호그니엘” (@hogniel), 15,362 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hogniel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.