https://naver.me/IIDYc0ep
❤8🔥1

Channel
@stock_messenger
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,581subscribers
-147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001431277802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @stock_messenger |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/stock_messenger |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 25,581 | -17 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 25,598 | -13 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 00:21 | 25,611 | -3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 25,614 | -9 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 25,623 | +9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 25,614 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:58 | 25,608 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 25,615 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 25,628 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 25,632 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 25,628 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 25,637 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 25,646 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 25,651 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 25,654 | -10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 25,664 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:37 | 25,668 | -17 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 25,685 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 25,694 | -16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 25,710 | first reading |
252 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 97 of 98 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 252 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 372,250 |
| Reactions total | 752 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,121 reactions across 247 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,109 | 52.3% | |
| 🔥 | 309 | 14.6% | |
| 👍 | 239 | 11.3% | |
| 🤣 | 138 | 6.51% | |
| 👏 | 103 | 4.86% | |
| 😱 | 89 | 4.20% | |
| 😁 | 80 | 3.77% | |
| 😭 | 25 | 1.18% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 0.471% | |
| 😈 | 10 | 0.471% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 0.236% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.094% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.047% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.047% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 247 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://naver.me/IIDYc0ep
❤8🔥1
한국전력, 삼전닉스에 25조 전기료 선납 제안
😱8❤3🔥1
https://naver.me/FriMyhfe
❤2🔥1
삼성전기, AI용 MLCC 1조원 ‘잭팟’…부품 확보전에 가격 협상력 커진다
👍7
📊 9/3(목) 종목 핵심 이슈 TOP 5 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 1️⃣ 알테오젠 노바티스와 최대 4.4조원 ALT-B4 기술수출 계약, 올해만 4번째 #알테오젠 #기술수출 #노바티스 2️⃣ 한미반도체 세미콘 타이완서 2.5D 패키징 장비 5종 공개, 차세대 HBM 대응 #한미반도체 #HBM #TC본더 3️⃣ 한화세미텍 600㎜ 대면적 FOPLP 장비 'SFM5 Square' 실물 최초 공개 #한화세미텍 #FOPLP #첨단패키징 4️⃣ 한화오션 오세아니아 선주와 VLGC 3척 4778억원 규모 수주 #한화오션 #수주 #조선주 5️⃣ SK 에코플랜트 수주잔액 25조원대 확대, 자사주 소각 기대 #SK #에코플랜트 #밸류업 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ #종목브리핑 #장전체크 #9월증시
❤7👍2
📰 9/3(목) 장전 뉴스 브리핑 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇺🇸 뉴욕증시 ▪️ 3대 지수 나흘 만에 반등 다우 +0.56% (53,061.95) S&P500 +0.46% (7,666.60) 나스닥 +0.45% (26,217.82) ▪️ 미 10년물 금리 고점 찍고 진정 장중 4.818% 터치, 2023년 11월 이후 최고치 → 4.78%로 하락 마감 ▪️ 반도체주 강세로 지수 견인 엔비디아 +3.2% / 마이크론 +2.4% / 퀄컴 +2.0% ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 지정학 ▪️ 트럼프 "대이란 공습 재개 오래 안 갈 것" 11월 중간선거 앞두고 확전 관리 모드 전환 시사 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇰🇷 국내 ▪️ 8월 외환보유액 4,423억 달러 ▪️ 어제 코스피 -3.99% 폭락 마감 (6,562.72) …
❤3
트럼프 측근들, 11월 중간선거 전까지 이란과의 전쟁 진정 추구
👍13❤3
https://naver.me/xF4Wu9xP
❤3
https://naver.me/GIIPJzGP
❤6
푸틴 "우크라전, 동결 아닌 항구적이고 완전한 평화 원해"
👍16😁6🤣3😱3❤1
https://naver.me/xllcFzgK
❤6
볼턴 "트럼프, 평양서 김정은 만나려 할 것"
😁9👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @stock_messenger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚡️번개맞은뉴스 - 상위2% 주식텔레그램 채널” (@stock_messenger), 25,581 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stock_messenger.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.