✅ 역사적 신고가 종목 엘리스(시가총액 : 8,892억) 현재가격 : 79,900원(+29.9%) 거래대금 : 1,166억 - - 클라우드 기반 교육 실습 플랫폼과 AI 데이터센터 모델 개발 완료에 따른 기술 경쟁력 강화 기대감. - 상장 첫날 폭락 후 반등하며 투자자들의 주목을 받는 상황. HT로보틱스(시가총액 : 2,951억) 현재가격 : 11,140원(+14.0%) 거래대금 : 3,074억 - - 글로벌 AIDC 전력 부품 공급망 진입으로 4분기 첫 공급 확정 기대감. - 수주잔고 1조 원 돌파 가능성에 따른 성장 기대감. 뉴파워프라즈마(시가총액 : 5,982억) 현재가격 : 13,690원(+6.9%) 거래대금 : 466억 - - 반도체 장비 시장에서 1위 기업 MKS의 시장점유율을 빼앗으며 미·중 시장 공략 가속화. - OLED …

Channel
AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링
@awake_realtimeCheck
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,841subscribers
+658 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001771079971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @awake_realtimeCheck |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 45 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/awake_realtimeCheck |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 22,841 | +1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 22,840 | +8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:21 | 22,832 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:05 | 22,826 | +16 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:45 | 22,810 | +12 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 22,798 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:39 | 22,804 | +6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 22,798 | +13 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 22,785 | +21 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 22,764 | +60 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:57 | 22,704 | +72 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:20 | 22,632 | +46 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 22,586 | +8 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 22,578 | +15 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 22,563 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 22,554 | -3 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 22,557 | +29 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:41 | 22,528 | +12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 22,516 | +8 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 22,508 | first reading |
Engagement
802 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 87 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.30%
- avg views ÷ 22,841 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,670
- 307 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.089%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 307
- of 802 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 94 of 307 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 802 (7 August 2026 – 21 October 2026) |
| Views total | 511,879 |
| Reactions total | 167 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 21 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
340 reactions across 180 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 288 | 84.7% | |
| 👍 | 37 | 10.9% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 2.65% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 802 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 802 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
- SK이노베이션(+6.2%)38%
- HMM(+5.3%)24%
- SK가스(+7.4%)7%
- 씨젠(+7.0%)7%
- NICE평가정보(+8.6%)8%
- 안랩(+6.8%)14%
- 인텍플러스(+8.4%)30%
- 엑시콘(+9.5%)32%
- 타이거일렉(+8.5%)16%
- 동국산업(+6.7%)14%
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤2
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
- 뉴파워프라즈마(역사적)92%
- 디케이락(52주)13%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
📌 당일 장중 외국인 수급(잠정) 정리 (2026-10-21 14:43기준) - 당일 외국인 잠정수급을 시총대비 순으로 정리했습니다. ✅ 외국인 순매수 상위 (+4.5%) 삼성전자 (+19.2%) 명신산업 (+2.3%) 에이피알 (+21.9%) 멜콘 (+6.0%) 대주전자재료 (+6.6%) 플리토 (+4.3%) 가온전선 ✅ 외국인 순매도 상위 (-0.8%) 삼성SDI (-10.2%) 서진시스템 (-1.7%) 코리아써키트 (-0.8%) SK텔레콤 (+7.4%) 나노엔텍 (-0.9%) 태성 (+2.6%) 에이치브이엠
✅ 서한(+16.49%) - 서울 한복판 데이터센터 수주로 전국구 기술력 입증 기대감. - 지역 최초 턴키공사 수주로 인한 건설기술 선도 전망. 📊 최근실적(매출/영업익/순익) 2026.2Q 1,476억/ 223억/ 195억 2026.1Q 1,053억/ 62억/ -9억 2025.4Q 1,552억/ 25억/ -50억 2025.3Q 1,387억/ 98억/ 55억 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=011370
✅ 서한(+16.49%) ❗️ 52주 최대 거래량 돌파 거래대금 : 30억 시가총액 : 912억 - 현재가 : 4,520원 (2026-10-21 14:43 기준)
📌 당일 장중 기관수급(잠정) 정리 (2026-10-21 14:43기준) - 당일 잠정 기관 수급을 시총대비 순으로 정리했습니다. ✅ 기관 순매수 상위 (+11.3%) 한양디지텍/ 투신, 연기금 매수 (+3.4%) 한중엔시에스/ 투신 매수 (+3.6%) 비나텍/ 연기금, 투신 매수 (+8.4%) 삼성E&A/ 연기금, 투신 매수 (-1.1%) 대덕전자/ 투신, 연기금 매수 (+9.4%) 제우스/ 투신 매수 (+9.9%) 케이씨텍/ 연기금, 투신 매수 ✅ 기관 순매도 상위 (+0.7%) 코스맥스/ 투신, 연기금 매도 (-1.7%) 기가비스/ 투신 매도 (+11.8%) HT로보틱스/ 투신 매도 (0%) 에이팩트/ 투신 매도 (-4.0%) 씨에스윈드/ 투신, 연기금 매도 (+0.5%) 일진전기/ 투신 매도 (-3.2%) 브이엠/ 투신, 보험 매
✅ 푸드나무(+22.63%) - 그린하버의 355억 경영권 인수 소식에 따른 시장의 긍정적 반응 기대감. - 헬스케어 신사업 확장 본격화로 인한 성장 잠재력 부각. 📊 최근실적(매출/영업익/순익) 2026.2Q 129억/ -36억/ -59억 2026.1Q 169억/ -70억/ -76억 2025.4Q 153억/ -15억/ 129억 2025.3Q 218억/ -22억/ -33억 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=290720
✅ 푸드나무(+22.63%) ❗️ 52주 최대 거래량 돌파 거래대금 : 458억 시가총액 : 711억 - 현재가 : 1,864원 (2026-10-21 12:50 기준)
✅ 디케이락(+16.19%) - 반도체용 피팅·밸브 수주 급증에 따른 실적 기대감. - 항공 및 방위산업 부품 분야 사업 확대로 인한 성장 전망. 📊 최근실적(매출/영업익/순익) 2026.2Q 395억/ 38억/ 35억 2026.1Q 328억/ 2억/ 19억 2025.4Q 394억/ 26억/ 19억 2025.3Q 376억/ 67억/ 78억 회사정보 : https://finance.naver.com/item/main.naver?code=105740
✅ 디케이락(+16.19%) ❗️ 52주 신고가 다시 돌파 거래대금 : 98억 시가총액 : 1,241억 - 현재가 : 12,200원 (2026-10-21 12:09 기준)
📌 당일 장중 외국인 수급(잠정) 정리 (2026-10-21 11:23기준) - 당일 외국인 잠정수급을 시총대비 순으로 정리했습니다. ✅ 외국인 순매수 상위 (+7.1%) 삼성전자 (+12.9%) HT로보틱스 (+23.3%) 멜콘 (+7.8%) 명신산업 (+5.9%) 대주전자재료 (+11.5%) 글로벌테크놀로지 (+7.5%) 플리토 ✅ 외국인 순매도 상위 (-0.3%) 코리아써키트 (+0.2%) 삼성SDI (-6.4%) 서진시스템 (+3.7%) 에이치브이엠 (+3.0%) 아주IB투자 (+0.9%) 대덕전자 (+1.8%) 한미반도체
Showing the 12 most recent of 802 posts we hold for @awake_realtimeCheck. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 65 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
- SK이노베이션(+6.2%)38%
- HMM(+5.3%)24%
- SK가스(+7.4%)7%
- 씨젠(+7.0%)7%
- NICE평가정보(+8.6%)8%
- 안랩(+6.8%)14%
- 인텍플러스(+8.4%)30%
- 엑시콘(+9.5%)32%
- 타이거일렉(+8.5%)16%
- 동국산업(+6.7%)14%
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
- 뉴파워프라즈마(역사적)92%
- 디케이락(52주)13%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
- HMM(+5.6%)47%
- S-Oil(+5.1%)27%
- 코웨이(+5.1%)5%
- SK가스(+7.6%)8%
- 케이씨텍(+9.2%)25%
- 안랩(+3.9%)18%
- 한국알콜(+3.1%)4%
- 뷰웍스(+9.5%)4%
- 디지털대성(+3.9%)3%
- 동국산업(+4.0%)8%
The shares total 149%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
- 넥사다이내믹스(52주)22%
- HT로보틱스(52주)78%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 신고가 괴리율 낮은 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 괄호()안은 신고가와 남은 거리임 - 복수투표 가능
- DB손해보험(+6.4%)11%
- 주성엔지니어링(+8.0%)56%
- 코웨이(+7.1%)3%
- SK가스(+8.1%)5%
- 케이씨텍(+4.9%)32%
- SFA반도체(+2.7%)27%
- 롯데렌탈(+1.0%)4%
- 디아이(+0.4%)38%
- SK디스커버리(+3.3%)4%
- 안랩(+8.0%)6%
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✅ 향후 상승 예상 종목은? - 당일 신규 신고가 돌파 종목 중 시가총액 상위순 - 복수투표 가능
- 금호전기(52주)not shown
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 802 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@mstaryun · 18,8147 posts커핑
@cupping86 · 1,2772 posts힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1562 posts주식클라쓰_하창봉👍
@sharpha · 9,1412 posts아트합시다.
@Korea_value · 5,4851 post아커스 망하면 배달 감
@cexwithkotether · 1,2961 post서화백의 그림놀이 🚀
@easobi · 23,4701 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,3911 post오답노트
@inlifebalance · 7591 post김찰저의 관심과 생각 저장소
@kimcharger · 25,0691 post공부하는 탑맨방
@topnpick · 3721 post🌈 퀀텀백의 idea for Tech 🌈
@trendinvestment · 2901 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@kimcharger · 25,069#1
@fourgachi · 9,431#2
@allbareun · 12,210#3
@tazastock · 40,762#4
@mootda · 19,678#5
@stocktrip · 7,249#6
@Onionfarmer · 16,069#7
@bdragon0808 · 13,470#8
@mstaryun · 18,814#9
@upper_limit_price · 7,982#10
@FastStockNews · 128,795#11
@easobi · 23,470#12
@bumgore · 35,389#13
@survival_DoPB · 22,125#14
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,209#15
@darthacking · 65,234#16
@stockinvcowcow · 13,592#17
@bufkr · 21,826#18
@ym_research · 40,039#19
@gaoshoukorea · 41,225#20
@bumsong2 · 13,254#21
@corevalue · 67,360#22
@quantum_ALGO · 7,606#23
@stockgrandmaster · 11,010#24
@twomachine · 5,285#25
@fastest_info1 · 13,434#26
@infomarketopen · 9,662#27
@slsyphus · 4,441#28
@small_stock · 9,160#29
@cyber_rangers · 16,906#30
@choaz1 · 7,009#31
@stbridgee · 4,654#32
@awake_schedule · 17,392#33
@psychotherapy101 · 5,943#34
@TambangVot · 8,480#35
@TNBfolio · 24,961#36
@cahier_de_market · 22,776#37
@CTTResearch · 6,876#38
@PRROEresearch · 4,639#39
@ivy77788 · 5,934#40
@jake8lee · 17,263#41
@JgrowthInv · 3,004#42
@StockPitchPR · 5,408#43
@Jstockclass · 26,332#44
@eugene2team · 7,004#45
@EarlyStock1 · 24,313#46
@GoUpstock · 21,012#47
@capitalmosquito · 4,268#48
@daegurr · 23,505#49
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,411#50
@bbong_tta · 12,790#51
@TRENDSETTERVERSION2 · 3,907#52
@hogniel · 15,306#53
@yaza_stock · 13,052#54
@G2strategy · 16,529#55
@Ten_level · 17,050#56
@investment_puzzle · 14,364#57
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,807#58
@bbanjil · 10,717#59
@desperatestudycafe · 18,643#60
@athletes_village · 22,049#61
@bornlupin · 48,831#62
@pharmbiohana · 29,790#63
@sunstudy1111 · 54,883#64
@getfeed · 8,800#65
@orangeboard · 4,613#66
@redbirdstock · 10,686#67
@growthresearch · 40,141#68
@insangnism · 11,253#69
@nje2e · 8,840#70
@mztanyong · 6,059#71
@thesis_true · 2,277#72
@tteoksangMalangCow · 23 (as read 20 September 2026)#73
@Fire_Direction_Center · 5,350#74
@kyunghun96 · 1,896#75
@aptvalueprice · 10,525#76
@Dogrini · 4,740#77
@hanagae · 4,617#78
@anysong_Technon · 4,970#79
@cpshelter · 5,402#80
@hwalja · 3,493#81
@stockDaram2 · 5,058#82
@theelec · 10,826#83
@econostudy · 8,464#84
@triple_stock · 13,311#85
@infodart · 6,808#86
@habit4117 · 28,054#87
@yieldnspread · 22,065#88
@Kyaooo · 17,448#89
@pikachu_aje · 25,081#90
@finter_gpt · 4,848#91
@Chatdopt · 1,324 (as read 20 September 2026)#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@huhpharm · 24,286
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
@jeilstock · 26,314
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 September 2026
@darthacking · 65,234
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
@kimcharger · 25,069
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,125
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,313
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@shmstory · 39,173
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@ym_research · 40,039
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@TNBfolio · 24,961
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 15 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,390
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,762
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,795
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@cahier_de_market · 22,776
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@bufkr · 21,826
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,225
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,360
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@kwusa · 36,362
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 37,081
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,209
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@mistergray_11 · 19,669
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@globaletfi · 20,498
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,332
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,159
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@easobi · 23,470
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AWAKE - 52주 신고가 모니터링” (@awake_realtimeCheck), 22,841 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awake_realtimeCheck.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.