1조 2955억
❤2

Channel
@bumgore
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,389subscribers
+339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192351807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bumgore |
| Description | 이 채널의 모든 내용들은 투자의 아이디어를 제공하는 것이지 직접 매수매도 추천을 드리는것이 아닙니다. 또한 이곳에 올라오는 모든 글은 믿을만한 정보를 바탕으로 작성 되지만 그것이 완벽하고 정확한 것을 의미하는 것은 아닙니다. 따라서 이곳의 글을 바탕으로 투자하였을 경우 모든 책임은 투자가에게 있는 것입니다 문의 [email protected] |
| Created | 20 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bumgore |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:31 | 35,389 | -3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 35,392 | +3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:15 | 35,389 | +10 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 35,379 | +8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 35,371 | +1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 10:47 | 35,370 | +1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 35,369 | -6 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 12:49 | 35,375 | +3 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 03:51 | 35,372 | +8 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:59 | 35,364 | +6 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 35,358 | +6 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 35,352 | +20 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:39 | 35,332 | +23 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 35,309 | +5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 35,304 | +11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 35,293 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 35,285 | +5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 35,280 | +19 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 35,261 | +20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 35,241 | first reading |
335 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 111 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 335 (3 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 584,778 |
| Reactions total | 1,117 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Oct 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,633 reactions across 328 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,454 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 727 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 347 | 9.55% | |
| 🤬 | 307 | 8.45% | |
| 😁 | 228 | 6.28% | |
| 👏 | 112 | 3.08% | |
| 😱 | 108 | 2.97% | |
| 🤔 | 78 | 2.15% | |
| 😨 | 31 | 0.853% | |
| 🤯 | 27 | 0.743% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 0.633% | |
| ✍ | 20 | 0.551% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 0.551% | |
| 😭 | 19 | 0.523% | |
| 🥰 | 18 | 0.495% | |
| ☃ | 15 | 0.413% | |
| 👌 | 13 | 0.358% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 0.33% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 0.303% | |
| 😈 | 10 | 0.275% | |
| 13 further kinds | 53 | 1.46% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 328 of the 335 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 335 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
1조 2955억
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
■ 오늘스케줄 - 10월 22일 목요일 삼성E&A 실적발표 LG디스플레이 실적발표 SGC에너지 실적발표 IPARK현대산업개발 실적발표 한국은행 금융통화위원회 기준금리결정 마이크론 대만 노조 파업 유니트리 테크놀로지, 세계 물리 AI 컨퍼런스 및 유니트리 파트너 생태계 컨퍼런스 오픈AI, '오픈AI 데브데이 익스체인지: 서울' 개최 10월 국고채전문딜러에 대한 모집방식의 비경쟁인수 발행계획 엠에스바이오 신규 상장 영광 공모청약 래블업 공모청약 이에스티 공모청약 인텔리빅스 공모청약 아이씨에이치 변경상장(주식병합) 한화투자증권 추가상장(유상증자) 한켐 보호예수 해제 알티캐스트 보호예수 해제
👍5❤2
카카오 제이피모건 Neutral 유지, TP 4.2만 → 2.8만 원으로 33% 하향 🎯 헤드라인: 분할 발표 이후 -20% — 디레이팅의 해부 8월 21일 인적분할 발표 이후 주가 -20%(코스피 -16%, 네이버 -18%), YTD로는 -50%(코스피 +33%) — 컨센서스 2026E 영업이익이 15% 상향됐는데도 벌어진 일. 급격한 디레이팅의 원인: AI 에이전트 등 신사업 실행력에 대한 회의 + 분할 후 KakaoX 가치의 추가 하방 우려, 그리고 분할의 명분 자체가 불분명해 경영진 신뢰가 훼손됐다는 진단. 분할 후 밸류에이션 프레임을 재구축 — KakaoAI 5.7조 원(레거시 메신저 사업에 2027 EV/EBIT 10.4배) + KakaoX 6.9조 원(상장 자회사에 더 높은 지주 할…
😁4❤3
LS일렉트릭 3분기 리뷰 골드만 Neutral 유지, TP 23만 → 24만 원 / 상승여력 45% 🎯 헤드라인: 구조적 비트 — 매출 +10%, 영업이익 +17% 컨센서스 상회 3Q26 매출 1조 8,780억 원(+54% YoY), 영업이익 2,340억 원(+132% YoY, OPM 12.4%) — 일회성 없는 구조적 톱라인 비트가 이익 비트로 연결. 전력기기 부문의 유럽·아시아 원자재 비용 압박만 없었다면 더 높았을 것 — 4분기엔 ASP 인상으로 정상화 예정. JPM이 프리뷰에서 “5% 비트” 전망했던 것을 크게 웃돈 결과. 📊 부문별 상세 스위치기어 +120% YoY(5,420억 원), 고압 변압기 +106%(1,830억), 전력기기 +32%(3,060억) — 스위치기어·전력기기의 …
❤7😁3🔥1
1조 2729억 📉
🤬6❤3🥰1
■ 오늘스케줄 - 10월 21일 수요일 미국신장학회(ASN)(현지시간) 체코 프라하 미래 국방기술 전시회 개최(현지시간) HD현대중공업 노조, 부분파업 돌입 미래혁신기술박람회(FIX 2026) 아시아 기계 & 제조 산업전 국제 모빌리티 산업전 25년 연간 기업경영분석 결과 9월 생산자물가지수(잠정) LS ELECTRIC 실적발표 삼성바이오로직스 실적발표 유니드 실적발표 인텔리빅스 공모청약 크리에이츠 공모청약 티앤이코리아 공모청약 한화플러스제6호스팩 공모청약 자비스 변경상장(주식병합) 스트라드비젼 추가상장(주식매수선택권행사) HLB제넥스 추가상장(CB전환) 퓨릿 추가상장(주식매수선택권행사) 시선AI 추가상장(CB전환) 네오사피엔스 보호예수 해제
👍6❤1
한국 백화점 제이피모건 섹터 뷰 중립화, 현대백화점 하향 (신세계만 OW 사수) 🎯 헤드라인: 세 기둥 중 둘이 무너졌다 백화점 긍정론의 3대 동력 — 자산효과, 인바운드 수요, 내년 소득효과 — 중 두 개가 실질적으로 약화. 최근 몇 달의 SSSG 둔화를 "일시 멈춤"으로 봤지만, 10월 상반월의 추가 하락이 4Q26E/1Q27E 역기저 강화와 겹치면서 그 해석을 방어하기 어려워짐. 코스피 급락이 명품 소비를 누르는 속도를 과소평가했고, 외국인 소비의 원화 절상 민감도도 가정보다 컸다는 자인. 섹터 뷰 중립화 — 현대백화점 Neutral 하향, 롯데 Neutral 유지, 신세계는 2027년 회복에 대한 가장 깔끔한 노출로 OW 유지. ❌ 3분기에 무엇이 어긋났나 가장 명확한 미스는 수요 모멘텀 — …
👍5❤4🔥3😁2😢1
매파적 동결 유지, 다음 인상은 1Q27 골드만 🎯 헤드라인 3분기 연속 인상(7·8월) 이후 한은은 매파적 편향 속 동결 유지 전망. 다음 25bp 인상은 1Q27이 유력하며 최종금리 3.25% 전망 유지 — 연준이 베이스라인보다 매파적일 경우 상방 리스크. 연준의 12월 2차 인상으로 한미 금리차는 일시 확대됐다가 2027년 말 연준 완화 재개와 함께 축소되는 경로. 📈 성장: 테크는 뜨겁고 소비는 차갑다 — 전망치 상향 3분기에도 K자형 분화 지속. 수출은 9월 YoY +83.5%까지 가속 — 증가분의 약 90%가 테크(특히 반도체), 수출액 증가의 약 60%는 가격 효과. 설비투자는 AI 관련 수입 장비 주도로 강한 모멘텀 유지(수입산 의존이지만 실질 GDP엔 유의미한 기여), 건설은 약하지만 AI capex 연계 수도권…
❤10👌3🔥1
1조 4158억 📈
🤬9🔥2
■ 오늘스케줄 - 10월 20일 화요일 정부, 주요 가상자산 거래소와 현장 간담회 국무회의 개최 NVIDIA GTC Berlin 2026(현지시간) Long Horizon: Physical AI Summit(현지시간) : AI, 로봇공학, 물리적 지능 분야의 전문 컨퍼런스 로보비즈니스 2026(현지시간) AIRTEC Aero(현지시간) ASHG 2026(현지시간) 엘리스그룹 신규 상장 한샘, 3400억 자사주 전량 소각 관련 보도 재공시 기한 코람코라이프인프라리츠, 안양물류센터 편입 보도 재공시 기한 콘텐트리중앙, 'SLL중앙 '자금 수혈' 티빙 지분 매각' 보도 재공시 기한 크리에이츠 공모청약 티앤이코리아 공모청약 한화플러스제6호스팩 공모청약 옴니시스템 변경상장(주식병합) 형지엘리트 변경상장(주식병합) 모아데이타 거래정지(주식병합) K…
❤5👍5
한국 투자 전략 제이피모건 올해 세 번째 -15% 드로다운: 바닥의 조건은 "수급" 🎯 헤드라인 3월·7월에 이어 올해 세 번째로 코스피 5일간 -15% 드로다운 발생. 전개 순서 — 자사주 매입 둔화에서 시작 → 글로벌 AI 센티먼트 동요로 가속 → 200일 이동평균 하향 이탈 후 기술적 매도까지 가세. 이 기간 팩터 성과는 방어주(필수소비재·헬스케어·저변동성) 외에 퀄리티·밸류·이익수정 팩터가 최선, 가격 모멘텀이 최악의 조정. JPM은 9월 중순부터 전술적 신중론을 예고해왔음 — "연준 인상 개시, 장기금리 상방, 엔 강세의 캐리 압박, 높은 유가, 중간선거까지의 계절적 약세로 10월 말까지 위험선호 위축, 퀄리티 팩터와 금융 섹터가 최선의 헤지"라는 지난달 코멘트가 그대로 실현된 셈. 📊 …
❤9🤬3🙏2🔥1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 335 posts we hold for @bumgore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@bumgore edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 48 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“시장 이야기 by 제이슨” (@bumgore), 35,389 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bumgore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.