Channel
@bumgore
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,261subscribers
+211 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192351807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bumgore |
| Description | 이 채널의 모든 내용들은 투자의 아이디어를 제공하는 것이지 직접 매수매도 추천을 드리는것이 아닙니다. 또한 이곳에 올라오는 모든 글은 믿을만한 정보를 바탕으로 작성 되지만 그것이 완벽하고 정확한 것을 의미하는 것은 아닙니다. 따라서 이곳의 글을 바탕으로 투자하였을 경우 모든 책임은 투자가에게 있는 것입니다 문의 [email protected] |
| Created | 20 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bumgore |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 35,261 | +20 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:59 | 35,241 | +6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 35,235 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:08 | 35,233 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 35,239 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 35,245 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 35,250 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 35,255 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 35,260 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:52 | 35,263 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:29 | 35,257 | +30 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 35,227 | +15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:14 | 35,212 | +18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 35,194 | +61 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 35,133 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 35,129 | +8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 35,121 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 35,117 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 35,110 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 35,111 | first reading |
186 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 148 of 155 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 186 (3 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 883,610 |
| Reactions total | 1,714 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 03:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,078 reactions across 179 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 813 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 372 | 17.9% | |
| 🤬 | 219 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 207 | 9.96% | |
| 😁 | 116 | 5.58% | |
| 👏 | 93 | 4.48% | |
| 🤔 | 64 | 3.08% | |
| 😱 | 45 | 2.17% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 0.914% | |
| 🙏 | 18 | 0.866% | |
| ✍ | 14 | 0.674% | |
| 🥰 | 13 | 0.626% | |
| ☃ | 11 | 0.529% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 0.433% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 0.433% | |
| 😨 | 8 | 0.385% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 0.337% | |
| 🗿 | 7 | 0.337% | |
| 🏆 | 6 | 0.289% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 0.241% | |
| 9 further kinds | 23 | 1.11% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 179 of the 186 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,078 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 186 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Flow Show BOA 하트넷 📊 YTD 성적판 유가 59.09달러, 글로벌 주식 +15.1%, 미국 주식 +13.2%, 금 +3.8%, 하이일드 +2.5%, 현금 +2.5%, 달러 +0.7%, IG -0.5%, 국채 -1.4%, 비트코인 -7.0%. 🏦 The Price Is Right: 인상 트리플이 온다 선물시장 프라이싱 기준 ECB 9월 10일 인상 확률 99%, 연준 16일 인상 53%, BoJ 18일 인상 98% — 중앙은행들이 채권금리 급등(AI capex + K자형 소비 붐의 최대 위협)을 막기 위해 신뢰 회복에 나서는 국면. 고용이 멈춘 상태에서의 연준 인상 = "신뢰도 회복이자 피크 금리"라는 해석 — 그래서 듀레이션 트레이드(러셀2000·바이오테크·한국·리츠)가 계속 작동…
👍2
삼성전자 골드만 NDR(캐나다·미국) 7대 테이크어웨이 Buy·CL TP 보통주 49만 우선주 36만 원 1️⃣ 2027년 수급, 올해보다 더 타이트 — 2028년까지 지속 메모리 수요 충족률이 약 60% 수준에 불과한 가운데 수요는 계속 늘고 단기 생산 증가는 제한적 — 발표된 업계 증설이 전부 가동돼도 2027년 수급 불균형은 올해보다 확대되고 2028년까지 타이트 지속이라는 기존 뷰 재확인. 2️⃣ 셸 퍼스트 전략: 유연성은 확보, 과잉투자는 경계 다운사이클에도 높은 capex를 유지한 덕에 경쟁사 대비 우월한 클린룸 캐파 보유. 팹 셸(건물)은 미리 짓되, 장비 투자는 수요 확정 후에만 집행 — 수요에 앞서가지 않는다는 원칙으로 유연성과 과잉투자 방지를 동시에 잡는 구조. …
👏4🔥2🥰1
에이피알 제이피모건 Overweight TP 56만 🎯 헤드라인: 수단 염료 검출 — 비공식 채널에 국한, 사업 모멘텀은 온전 싱가포르 보건과학청(HSA)이 메디큐브 PDRN 핑크콜라겐 캡슐크림 2개 배치에서 금지 물질 수단 IV 미량 검출을 발표하고 리콜을 명령했다는 현지 보도에 주가 이틀간 -6%(코스피 보합 대비). 그러나 핵심 팩트: 양성 샘플은 APR 공식 유통망 밖의 베누스뷰티 판매분 2개 배치에 국한됐고, APR 싱가포르가 제출한 샘플은 음성. 회사는 공식 소싱 제품의 제3자 추가 검사에서도 수단 염료가 검출되지 않았다며, 공식 공급망을 거치지 않은 해당 제품이 위조품일 가능성을 의심 중. 🔍 품질 이슈로 일반화하기엔 근거 부족 현 단계에서 APR의 제조·유통망 …
❤6👍2🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
코리아 위클리 킥스타트 골드만 📉 지난 주 시장 강한 자사주 매입 유입 + 원화 강세에도 코스피 -1.5%. 레저·은행·화학 아웃퍼폼 vs 건설·조선·소프트웨어 최대 언더퍼폼. 외국인은 코스피 순매도 지속 — 역시 테크 중심 유출. 12개월 선행 EPS는 +3.2% 상향(조선 최대 상향, 증권 최대 하향). 원화는 달러 대비 +1.7%, 유로 대비 +1.4% 강세, 엔 대비는 -0.6%. 코리아 주식 리스크 바로미터는 -0.4로 리스크 중립 구간 유지. 🔍 이번 주 차트 ①: 시장을 떠받치는 건 자사주 매입뿐 최근 4주간 한국 증시 유입은 사실상 자사주 매입이 견인 — 나머지 투자자 그룹은 모두 유출. 그 바이백의 대부분을 양대 반도체 기업(삼성전자·SK하이닉스)이 차지 — 삼성 90~110조 환원, 하이닉스 40조 바이…
❤5👍1😁1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8👍5🔥1😁1
1조 3516억 📉
🤬3😁3❤1👏1🥰1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁8🤔3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍29🤔6🤯3😁3💯2🤩1
아시아 전력 기기 제이피모건 미국 전력망 행정명령의 파장: 중국 배제, 한국 수혜 🎯 배경 외국산 전력망 장비 구매·수입을 제한하는 미국 행정명령이 아시아 전력기기 업계에 큰 영향을 줄 수 있다는 판단 — 중국 최대급 송전설비 업체 고위 임원과의 전문가 콜 내용 정리. 🇨🇳 중국 업체의 현장 체감 최근 며칠간 해당 회사의 미국향 주문 다수가 검토·재협상·보류 상태로 전환 — 아직 대규모 취소는 없지만, 미 에너지부(DOE)가 120일 내 시행세칙을 내놓기 전까지 신규 미국 수주는 의미 있게 위축될 전망. 다만 과도한 비관은 경계 — 이 행정명령이 미중 협상의 카드가 될 수 있고 세부 규정도 조정될 여지가 있다는 시각. ⚡️ 시장 영향 데이터센터 연결용 고압 변압기에서 중국의 미국 시장 점유율은 최소 10%대 중후반 이상으로…
❤16👍5⚡1🔥1
로보티즈 골드만 "마이크로덕" 돌풍이 보여준 피지컬 AI 수요 🦆 무슨 일이 있었나 허깅페이스 산하 폴렌 로보틱스가 8월 27일 25cm 오픈소스 이족보행 로봇 "마이크로덕" 사전주문 개시 — 399달러 가격에 서보모터 15개·온보드 비전·사전학습 보행 탑재, 출시 며칠 만에 1만 대 이상 사전주문. 작년 7월 출시된 299달러 데스크톱 로봇 "리치 미니"(음성·시각 상호작용 중심)에 이은 저가 라인업 확장으로, 이번엔 보행·행동 학습·sim-to-real 배포에 초점 — 실물 로봇 훈련용 저가 하드웨어에 대한 개발자 수요 가속을 보여주는 사례. 🔩 로보티즈가 직접 수혜인 이유 마이크로덕 1대에 로보티즈 XL330 액추에이터 15개, 리치 미니엔 9개 탑재. 초기 물량(리치 미니 2만 + 마이…
🔥15❤5👍2🎉1🫡1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁5
Showing the 12 most recent of 186 posts we hold for @bumgore. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“시장 이야기 by 제이슨” (@bumgore), 35,261 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bumgore.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.