Channel
@habit4117
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,854subscribers
+447 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001600798466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @habit4117 |
| Description | 행동은 습관이 되고, 습관은 가치가 된다. -정직, 겸손, 상식, 철학, 습관, 태도. 본 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용도이고 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다. |
| Created | 5 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/habit4117 |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 27,854 | +22 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:40 | 27,832 | +14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 27,818 | +16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 27,802 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 27,798 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:37 | 27,800 | +26 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 27,774 | +26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 27,748 | +11 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 27,737 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:25 | 27,739 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 27,744 | +7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 27,737 | +39 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 27,698 | +37 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 27,661 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 27,667 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 27,666 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 27,675 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 27,672 | +23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 27,649 | +15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 27,634 | first reading |
906 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 387 of 425 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 906 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 1,492,501 |
| Reactions total | 6,833 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 23:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13,897 reactions across 758 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6,267 | 45.1% | |
| 🤣 | 3,414 | 24.6% | |
| 😱 | 2,651 | 19.1% | |
| 😭 | 1,565 | 11.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 779 of the 906 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 906 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @habit4117. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 906 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
L 하워드 막스의 메모는 "정부가 시장의 수급 법칙과 경제 원리를 무시하고 인위적으로 금리를 누르는 개입(국채 바이백 등)은 임시방편일 뿐이며, 막대한 재정 적자와 구조적 인플레이션이라는 근본 원인을 해결해야만 경제 안정성을 찾을 수 있다"는 메시지를 담고 있습니다. 이를 세부 내용으로 구성하면 다음과 같습니다. -인위적 시장 개입의 한계: 정부가 국채를 되사들여 금리를 억누르는 것은 열이 나는 환자에게 아이스팩만 대는 격으로, 단기적 임시방편일 뿐 근본적인 해결책이 되지 못합니다. -금리 상승의 근본 원인: 끈질긴 인플레이션, 방만한 재정 적자로 인한 정부 부채 폭증, 그리고 AI 인프라 투자 등으로 인한 자본 수요 급등이 복합적으로 작용하여 금리를 올리고 있습니다. -구조적 해결책의 필요성: 현실적으로 부채를 완납하기는 어려우므…
👍3
하워드 막스의 메모_경제 법칙을 폐지할까요? https://m.blog.naver.com/cy2863/224420559409
😭3
하반기 주요자산 수익률 '1위' -하반기 47%로 압도적 선두
👍5
"삼성전자, 목표가 63만원으로 상향…조정은 매수 기회" 유안타증권 연구원은 "메모리 반도체의 가격 상승 폭이 다소 둔화하겠지만, 2027~2028년에도 빠듯한 수급 환경이 이어질 전망이라는 점을 주목한다"며 "시장은 신규 증설과 HBM(고대역폭메모리) 관련 노이즈로 인한 2028년 피크아웃 가능성을 우려하고 있으나, HBM의 범용 DRAM (D램) 생산능력 잠식과 AI(인공지능) 추론 확산에 따른 고용량 메모리 수요를 감안하면 공급 제약의 해소 시점은 예상보다 늦어질 가능성이 높기 때문"이라고 분석했다. 이어 "메모리 업사이클이 장기화할 경우 삼성전자 FCF(잉여현금흐름)는 과거 대비 구조적으로 확대돼 보다 친화적인 주주환원 정책을 제시할 가능성도 배제할 수 없다"며 "내년 연간 실적 추정치 상향 조정에 따라 목표주가를 63만원으로 상향…
👍4😱2
비트코인은 하루에 1조원대 대규모 자금이 순유입되고 있다 -이번 유입이 기관의 대규모 단일 거래보다는 개인투자자 중심일 가능성이 높다.
👍5😱1
'삼전닉스' 자사주도 끝난다…또 외국인 눈치보는 코스피 -삼성전자 78%·SK하이닉스 61% 완료 https://biz.chosun.com/stock/stock_general/2026/09/23/PEMB3FDOARBYHJQGBYA2DQEN6E/
👍1
"삼성전자 3분기 영업익 기대치 하회 전망…범용 메모리보다 HBM·파운드리 주목해야" -기대치 밑돌아도…35만원 간다 https://biz.chosun.com/stock/stock_general/2026/09/23/5ZURT3IIBJADPCXGJYSGLY4O54/
👍5
北전투기, 백령도 인근 남하... 전술조치선 넘어 공군 발진 북한 미그 계열 전투기 1대가 22일 오전 서해 전술조치선(TAL)을 넘어 남하해 우리 공군이 전투기를 긴급 발진시켜 대응했다. 해경도 백령도 인근 해역에 있던 어선 70여 척을 인근 항구로 대피시켰다. 전술조치선은 북한 전투기가 수도권 등에 도달하기 전에 대비하기 위해 서해 북방한계선과 군사분계선의 20~50㎞ 북쪽 상공에 가상으로 설정돼 있다. 북한 전투기가 전술조치선을 넘어 남하한 사실이 공개된 것은 2022년 이후 처음이다. https://naver.me/FjmRgl4o
😱16
월가 톱 분석가, 샌디스크 목표가 2,400달러 제시..."1,700% 폭등도 서막일 뿐" https://www.g-enews.com/article/Securities/2026/09/202609230710338611e250e8e188_1
👍5
삼전-닉스 해외 실시간 추정가 📈
👍19
코스피 야간 선물 📈
👍13
미국 증시는 혼조세로 마감했다. 메타 플랫폼스의 인공지능(AI) 에이전트 '뮤즈'를 향한 기대와 공포가 엇갈리면서 마이크론 테크놀로지 등 반도체주는 급등한 반면 소비 관련주는 약세를 보였다. 반도체주가 상승을 주도했다. 메모리 반도체 업체인 마이크론과 샌디스크는 각각 5.00%, 6.82% 급등했다. 필라델피아 반도체 지수는 엿새 연속 상승했다. 중동 정세는 호재로 작용했다. 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령은 유엔총회를 계기로 이란 대표단과 세 시간 동안 만난 회담이 "매우 생산적"이었다며 조만간 추가 회담이 추진되고 있다고 밝혔다. 악시오스에 따르면 압바스 아라그치 이란 외무장관이 스티브 위트코프, 재러드 쿠슈너 미국 특사와 만났다. 다만 트럼프 대통령은 유엔총회 연설에서 중동 분쟁을 끝낼 합의가 이뤄지지 않으면 이란을 절멸시킬 수 있다고 …
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 906 posts we hold for @habit4117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 76 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘” (@habit4117), 27,854 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habit4117.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.