"한국 주식 안 삽니다" 코스피 대탈출 https://magazine.hankyung.com/business/article/202611072044b

Channel
습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘
@habit4117
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,281subscribers
+874 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001600798466 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @habit4117 |
| Description | 행동은 습관이 되고, 습관은 가치가 된다. -정직, 겸손, 상식, 철학, 습관, 태도. 본 채널의 게시물은 단순 의견 및 기록용도이고 매수-매도 등 투자권유를 의미하지 않습니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 부정확할 수 있으며 매매에 따른 손실은 거래 당사자의 책임입니다. 해당 게시물의 내용은 어떤 경우에도 법적 근거로 사용될 수 없습니다. |
| Created | 5 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/habit4117 |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 28,281 | +42 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 28,239 | +17 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 28,222 | +29 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 28,193 | +20 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:18 | 28,173 | +9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:26 | 28,164 | +14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 09:59 | 28,150 | +21 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 08:57 | 28,129 | +6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 28,123 | +7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 28,116 | +16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:47 | 28,100 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 28,096 | +6 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:10 | 28,090 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 28,084 | +7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:44 | 28,077 | +23 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:16 | 28,054 | +4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:05 | 28,050 | +10 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 28,040 | +21 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 28,019 | +9 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 28,010 | first reading |
Engagement
2,335 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 145 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.1%
- avg views ÷ 28,281 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,140
- 983 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.488%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 983
- of 2,335 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 773 of 983 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,335 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,084,400 |
| Reactions total | 12,279 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 02:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈14,000
- Videos
- ≈2,790
- Links
- ≈54,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 03m
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 75 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,340 reactions across 777 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,230 | 42.4% | |
| 🤣 | 2,833 | 23.0% | |
| 😱 | 2,195 | 17.8% | |
| 😭 | 2,082 | 16.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 782 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 October 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @habit4117. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 8 October 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 457 of 983 posts held from the last 30 days (46.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
로이터 "상하이 증시 침체로 중국 YMTC 상장 보류, 낸드 생산능력 확장 계획에 차질 전망" https://www.businesspost.co.kr/BP?command=article_view&num=451255
👍5
전기차 공장 8시간 교대 근무 '휴머노이드' 화제 -샤오미, 자사 공장 투입 성과 공개..."테슬라 옵티머스 보다 나은 수준" https://share.google/CJF8bN1CUmieperuo
👍2
데이터센터 멈추나 쪼개진 AI주… 그래도 반도체는 간다 https://magazine.hankyung.com/business/article/202611057553b
😭1
60달러냐 140달러냐…증시 반등 가를 중동의 향방 https://magazine.hankyung.com/business/article/202611046262b
🤣1
70%는 선반영됐다 vs 추가 폭락… 코스피 바닥 어디 https://magazine.hankyung.com/business/article/202611056841b
🤣2
"냉동고 온도계까지 노린다"…美 사이버 안보 당국, 전 세계에 긴급 경고 https://www.g-enews.com/article/Global-Biz/2026/11/202611070657366258fda4f5ab74_1
🤣2
"TSMC, 첨단 AI 메모리 반도체 생산 검토…엔비디아 요청" https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4443572
🤣1
미국 증시는 혼조세로 마감했다. 기술주 중심의 나스닥지수는 전일 급락으로 조정장에 진입했다는 평가를 받았으나 반도체주를 중심으로 저가 매수세가 유입되면서 반등했다. 다만 민주당의 데이터센터 규제 가능성에 대한 우려가 여전한 데다 예상보다 강한 고용지표가 연준의 금리 인상 전망을 강화하면서 증시의 반등 폭은 제한됐다. CNBC는 “과거 나스닥지수가 조정 국면에 진입했던 사례를 살펴보면 기술주들은 이후 3~6개월에 걸쳐 안정을 되찾는 경우가 많았다”면서 “단기적으로는 변동성이 큰 장세가 이어질 수 있다”고 내다봤다.
👍10
정부, 담보유지비율 유지 의무 3개월 면제 -삼성증권은 오는 9일 하루 동안 담보비율을 현행보다 10%포인트(p) 낮춰 적용하고, 이후엔 별도의 신청 시스템을 마련할 계획이다. -키움증권은 신청 고객에 한해 반대매매 대상이 된 계좌에 '1일 유예'를 적용키로 했다. -한국투자증권은 신청 고객에 한해 한시적으로 반대매매를 유예키로 했다. 3개월 동안 유예제도를 시행하는데, 대상은 다음 날 또는 당일 반대매매 대상 고객이다. 담보 비율 120~130%는 1차례, 130~140%는 매일 재신청을 통해 유예할 수 있다. -미래에셋증권은 국내 주식의 경우 기존 140%에서 130%로 담보유지비율을 하향하되, 관리종목과 정리매매 종목은 기존대로 160%를 유지한다. 해외주식담보융자의 경우 기존대로 140%이지만, 국내주식신용공여와 해외주식담보융…
🤣14
美민주, ‘트럼프 밀착’ 기업들 조사 채비 -애플·메타에 '머스크 기업'도 겨냥 https://biz.chosun.com/international/international_general/2026/11/07/ILUYN7X4YZD67IE4PJ3TH4WGW4/
👍2
백악관 "데이터센터, 지지하는 주지사 있는 곳으로 이전할 것" https://news.einfomax.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=4443570
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,335 posts we hold for @habit4117. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@habit4117 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 3 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 3 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 83 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@songjongsik · 18,53441 posts지식 책꽂이 (이대호 기자)
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,38223 posts호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,36215 posts힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,15114 posts인상주의 투자 인생 업그레이드노트
@insangnism · 11,22912 posts조기주식회 공부방
@EarlyStock1 · 24,39410 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,67710 posts스톡홀리데이
@dhk1567 · 347 postsIT의 신 이형수
@hslpartners · 19,0167 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,8346 posts눈썰미
@nunssulmi · 16 posts제약/바이오/미용 원리버 Oneriver
@pharmbiohana · 29,7815 posts가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1284 posts메모장
@idea_memo · 8,9774 postsCall to Arms 🦅
@JBSTOCKPAWNSHOP · 1,4273 postsYOUTUBE로 공부하기
@YOUs_STUDY · 9893 posts엘리트강사의 주식 공부방
@elite_instructor · 10,9023 postsFOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,3853 postsHAMS INVESTMENT
@hamsinvestment · 83 posts인포마켓 infomarket
@infomarketopen · 9,7393 posts✨Stay hungry.ASI
@stayhungryasi · 1,5223 posts🗽엄브렐라(Umbrella Research) 리서치+ 네프콘 옆집부자형 since 2020
@umbrellaresearch · 13,0053 posts캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,4732 posts코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,4112 posts간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,5282 posts후상의 인사이트 저장소
@gngntkd · 4022 posts김기자의 사회과부도
@kijaking · 632 posts김현석(자본주의 바이어스 있는 채널입니다)
@kimu_nim · 7,7062 posts롱텀성장투자
@longtermgrowthinvest · 7322 posts묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7702 posts행인7 주식, 경제 스터디
@peds7 · 6622 posts용산의 현인
@petrojimmy · 7,0122 posts에버그린 Evergreen 정보 공유방
@talkevergreen · 13,2012 posts야자반 - Y.Z. stock
@yaza_stock · 13,0532 posts64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,5601 post바밀이야 bamilirya
@Bananamilkrich · 8,6441 post주린이 개소리하는 채널
@Dogrini · 4,7291 post주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,8851 post돼지바
@bbong_tta · 12,8751 post비지뉴스의 이것저것입니다
@busynewsinvest · 1631 post🔥치리뱅치리 자료방🔥
@chiribang · 31 post피터팬의 유익한 정보 채널
@coinnewsshop · 6,6131 post반붐온? 방붐온?
@cpshelter · 5,3791 post큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,3341 post상장기업 수사대 ☎️
@cyber_rangers · 16,9011 post우주방산AI로봇 아카이브
@defence_24 · 10,1331 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,8961 post다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,1041 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@songjongsik · 18,5343 postsIT의 신 이형수
@hslpartners · 19,0162 posts점프
@jump0000 · 3,3702 posts선진짱 주식공부방
@sunstudy1111 · 55,1252 posts가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1281 post딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,1301 post스크랩 by 훵키클리닉
@funkyclinic · 3,8671 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3621 post미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,8841 post중도의 투자이야기
@joongdo · 4,8281 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7701 postsilver_mansachs
@silver_mansachs · 21 post여의도 감성투자
@ygamsung · 6,7351 postYM리서치
@ym_research · 39,8581 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@daegurr · 23,733#1
@fourgachi · 9,385#2
@Ten_level · 16,997#3
@aptvalueprice · 10,386#4
@getfeed · 8,777#5
@yaza_stock · 13,053#6
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,483#7
@quantum_ALGO · 7,611#8
@G2strategy · 16,669#9
@easobi · 23,405#10
@orangeboard · 4,595#11
@Onionfarmer · 16,144#12
@stbridgee · 4,635#13
@stocktrip · 7,234#14
@tazastock · 40,946#15
@knowledge_to_wealth · 14,382#16
@Korea_value · 5,474#17
@hankyung_fin · 12,685#18
@FastStockNews · 128,885#19
@fastest_info1 · 13,620#20
@bdragon0808 · 13,453#21
@anysong_Technon · 4,968#22
@growthresearch · 40,099#23
@bumsong2 · 13,464#24
@allbareun · 12,174#25
@athletes_village · 22,154#26
@mztanyong · 6,072#27
@Fire_Direction_Center · 5,309#28
@bumgore · 35,371#29
@Kyaooo · 17,473#30
@small_stock · 9,365#31
@jake8lee · 17,239#32
@slsyphus · 4,445#33
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,469#34
@stockgrandmaster · 11,054#35
@bufkr · 21,623#36
@ygamsung · 6,735#37
@mistergray_11 · 19,767#38
@GoUpstock · 21,090#39
@twomachine · 5,373#40
@moneybottle · 15,733#41
@Donmaek · 6,544#42
@capitalmosquito · 4,251#43
@selfstudystock · 3,631#44
@survival_DoPB · 22,082#45
@nje2e · 8,956#46
@yakjangsu · 11,386#47
@pharmbiohana · 29,781#48
@PRROEresearch · 4,626#49
@ym_research · 39,858#50
@kim_rob · 4,477#51
@cyber_rangers · 16,901#52
@corevalue · 67,128#53
@choaz1 · 6,961#54
@rafikiresearch · 20,674#55
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,017#56
@bbong_tta · 12,875#57
@bbanjil · 10,677#58
@kimcharger · 25,227#59
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,364 (as read 10 September 2026)#60
@TRENDSETTERVERSION2 · 3,890#61
@Dogrini · 4,729#62
@insangnism · 11,229#63
@investment_puzzle · 14,313#64
@mstaryun · 18,794#65
@redbirdstock · 10,746#66
@awake_realtimeCheck · 22,881#67
@desperatestudycafe · 18,528#68
@econostudy · 8,435#69
@cpshelter · 5,379#70
@yieldnspread · 22,071#71
@hwalja · 3,455#72
@upper_limit_price · 7,957#73
@hanagae · 4,602#74
@mk81_koreainvestment · 16,642#75
@darthacking · 65,589#76
@gaoshoukorea · 41,224#77
@sunstudy1111 · 55,125#78
@psychotherapy101 · 5,928#79
@The_MariTimes · 7,561#80
@minchoisfuture · 15,417#81
@theelec · 10,819#82
@bornlupin · 49,195#83
@kwtok · 9,437#84
@gatubang · 14,547#85
@triple_stock · 13,417#86
@pengmeup · 9,151#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@daegurr · 23,733
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@athletes_village · 22,154
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@growthresearch · 40,099
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@FastStockNewsUSA · 40,990
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@desperatestudycafe · 18,528
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
@survival_DoPB · 22,082
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 September 2026
@stock_messenger · 25,253
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
@FastStockNews · 128,885
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@shmstory · 39,575
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@tazastock · 40,946
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,469
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@YeouidoStory2 · 58,017
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@mistergray_11 · 19,767
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@easobi · 23,405
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@corevalue · 67,128
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@bumgore · 35,371
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@Jstockclass · 26,522
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 September 2026
@realtime_stock_news · 36,981
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,071
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,224
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
@EarlyStock1 · 24,394
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,135
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@bufkr · 21,623
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@sunstudy1111 · 55,125
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“습관이 부자를 만든다. 🧘” (@habit4117), 28,281 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/habit4117.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.