#석유 상승에도 불구하고 #귀금속, 특히 #은 은 하락을 거부하고 있습니다. 저는 지난 달(7월 22일)부터 귀금속 포지션 진입 시작했으며, 지금도 여전히 긍정적으로 보고 있습니다. #전망

Channel
Polaristimes
@The_MariTimes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,367subscribers
+100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001393291031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_MariTimes |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_MariTimes |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 7,367 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 7,349 | +28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 7,321 | +13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 7,308 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 7,314 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 7,313 | +45 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 7,268 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:42 | 7,265 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:23 | 7,273 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 7,272 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 7,270 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 7,267 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 7,267 | first reading |
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.9%
- avg views ÷ 7,367 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,240
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 128 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 128 (5 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 48,504 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
현 시각 #환율(달러인덱스) 및 #미국 테너 별 #국채 #금리 어제 바이백 이벤트가 확실히 시장 심리를 흔들어 놓았네요. 유가가 100불에 근접하고 있음에도 불구하고 금리, 특히 2년물 금리는 그리 크게 상승하지 않고 있고, 일드커브 스티프닝 속 달러인덱스는 유가 상승에도 불구하고 약세 중입니다. 다만... 이러한 현상은 자칫 #개도국화 로 이어지기 아주 쉬운 환경이니 #주식 시장이 안심할 수만은 없습니다.
브렌트, 장중 +3% 상승하며 95불 근접
#금 +4% #은 +5% 백금 +6% 투기꾼들이 달라붙으면서 금<은<백금 구도 완성
이더리움 +10% 폭등 23시 45분에 별다른 헤드라인은 없었고, 바이백 이벤트 속 #암호화폐 쪽 숏커버링이 들어오는 듯
#금, 장중 +4%
#사우디, #아랍에미리트 에 대한 금융 거래 규제 강화 - 사실상 아랍에미리트를 불법 자금 흐름 위험 국가와 동일하게 취급 UAE는 자금세탁 국가에 불과하다고 사실상 인정하는 조치 #지정학 https://www.newarab.com/news/saudi-arabia-tightens-anti-crime-oversight-uae-bank-transfers
#미국 전쟁부, 이번 전쟁이 끝나면 #중동 에서 미군 주둔 규모를 축소하는 방안 검토 '미군 없는 중동'은 이란의 요구사항 중 하나입니다. 이란의 요구사항이 하나둘씩 전부 이뤄지고 있는 상황 #지정학 #시대의_변곡점 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/08/18/pentagon-evaluating-smaller-us-military-presence-persian-gulf-after-iran-war/
#이란 혁명수비대, #아랍에미리트 #탱커 나포 - 혁수대, AIS 전원을 끄고 통항하는 선박은 무해통항으로 간주하지 않는다고 밝혀 - #미국 주도의 작전에 참여하면서 상선이라 주장할 수는 없으며, 작전에 가담한다면 어떤 선박이든 제재를 받을 것 #물류망 #지정학 https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/videos/international/irans-irgc-captures-uae-vessel-in-hormuz-as-trump-issues-another-warning-report/videoshow/133306615.cms https://www.presstv.co.uk/Detail/2026/08/18/774583/Iran-warning-United-States-shipping-network https://vista.…
#이란 가리바바디 외무차관, #중국 외교차관과 회동 #지정학 https://borna.news/en/news/6200/iranian-chinese-deputy-foreign-ministers-meet-in-beijing
#유럽 #주식(유로스탁스) 또한 약세, 반면 #중국(#홍콩 항셍)이나 #브라질 등 신흥국 강세 이번에는 신흥국 쪽으로?
#주식(나스닥), 개장과 동시에 투매 확대, 바이백 발 상승폭 전부 반납
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @The_MariTimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@dots999 · 2113 posts디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 11,9762 postsFOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 8,3632 postsPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,0632 posts캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,3662 posts간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,8201 post기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 20,2701 post주식비서 시황/주도주/뉴스
@jusikbiso · 3,0161 post📉껑껑이의 메모장📈
@kkeongsmemo · 10,9151 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@aetherjapanresearch · 34,408
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,034
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@habit4117 · 27,798
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,212
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@sypark_strategy · 29,548
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,184
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polaristimes” (@The_MariTimes), 7,367 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_MariTimes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.