Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 디젠의 트레이딩 일지

Channel

디젠의 트레이딩 일지

@degen2468

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,896subscribers

+1,288 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002486651717
TypeChannel
Username@degen2468
DescriptionKorean degen’s trading dairy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/degen2468

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,60812,90112,254.56 August 2026 — 11,608 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,608 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,609 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,713 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,731 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,801 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,803 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,800 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,830 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,844 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,842 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,847 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,874 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,881 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,775 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,744 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,756 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,759 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,755 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,748 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,749 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,751 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,749 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,761 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,755 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,782 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,803 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,911 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,976 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,969 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,954 subscribers16 September 2026 — 11,974 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,990 subscribers25 September 2026 — 12,131 subscribers4 October 2026 — 12,157 subscribers8 October 2026 — 12,177 subscribers13 October 2026 — 12,454 subscribers14 October 2026 — 12,613 subscribers15 October 2026 — 12,639 subscribers16 October 2026 — 12,638 subscribers17 October 2026 — 12,687 subscribers18 October 2026 — 12,824 subscribers19 October 2026 — 12,846 subscribers20 October 2026 — 12,848 subscribers21 October 2026 — 12,852 subscribers22 October 2026 — 12,853 subscribers24 October 2026 — 12,855 subscribers25 October 2026 — 12,873 subscribers26 October 2026 — 12,877 subscribers27 October 2026 — 12,880 subscribers28 October 2026 — 12,890 subscribers29 October 2026 — 12,897 subscribers30 October 2026 — 12,899 subscribers1 November 2026 — 12,898 subscribers2 November 2026 — 12,899 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,901 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,899 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,896 subscribers12,8966 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,288. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,414–13,095 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 06:1112,896-3
5 Nov 2026, 04:1812,899-2
3 Nov 2026, 07:4812,901+2
2 Nov 2026, 09:0912,899+1
1 Nov 2026, 09:4812,898-1
30 Oct 2026, 11:5012,899+2
29 Oct 2026, 10:3412,897+7
28 Oct 2026, 05:5112,890+10
27 Oct 2026, 05:3012,880+3
26 Oct 2026, 07:0912,877+4
25 Oct 2026, 04:3612,873+18
24 Oct 2026, 01:2712,855+2
22 Oct 2026, 23:0512,853+1
21 Oct 2026, 21:3112,852+4
20 Oct 2026, 14:5612,848+2
19 Oct 2026, 11:2612,846+22
18 Oct 2026, 11:5512,824+137
17 Oct 2026, 10:4712,687+49
16 Oct 2026, 08:5512,638-1
15 Oct 2026, 10:3112,639first reading

Engagement

407 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.2%
avg views ÷ 12,896 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,890
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.906%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 407 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held407 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total202,286
Reactions total1,725
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 18:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
933
Videos
12
Links
523

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 53s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,531 reactions across 367 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11,06066.9%
👍3,24219.6%
🔥7824.73%
😱6163.73%
😢2981.80%
👏2691.63%
🤩1070.647%
🥰710.429%
🎉470.284%
🙏390.236%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 387 of the 407 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,048 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 407 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 18:39 UTCviews —

디젠의 트레이딩 일지 pinned «이거 좀 중요해 보이는 기사네요 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/10/09/elizabeth-warren-senate-banking-chair-01113175»

6 Nov 2026, 18:23 UTC427 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://x.com/5morewhooppers/status/2118664554666160173?a=Owr-V_o37sZJHWoUT_s&s=46

❤1🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC519 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026

오히려 리플(공화당에 크게 로비) 솔라나(밈코) 에서 비트 이더 지캐시 모네로로 자금이 이동할 거라 생각함 zcash will flip xrp someday rotate sol xrp to zec xmr

🔥8❤1

6 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC≈2,530 views56 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @magonia_bPhoto

민주당 블루웨이브가 미치는 크립토 영향? 민주당 상원 의원 엘리자베스 워렌이 미국 상원 은행위원회 차기 의장으로 예측되고 있음. 워렌은 암호화폐 비판가 포지션이며 클레리티의 최대 적수였음. 광범위한 금융 산업 감독, 소화 권한을 "1월"부터 얻게 됨. 그녀가 바로 착수할 것들은 다음과 같음 - 예측 시장 내부자 거래 혐의 조사 - 트럼프 가족 구성원의 부정부패 조사 - 암호화폐 회사 소비자 보호 관행 검토 - 은행과 스테이블 코인 발행 회사간의 이자지급 논쟁검토 하지만 오늘 증시가 3조달러 가까이 날아간 지금 상황에서 이미 위의 사실은 선반영 되어 있다고 보는게 현명할 것 같음. 아래에서 차트로 확인해보기 1. 나스닥100 지수가 순간적 낙폭을 -7% 기록한 반면, 비트코인은 -6%대에서 방어하는 모습을 보였음. 2. 동일 구간에서…

❤56

6 Nov 2026, 04:27 UTC≈3,630 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026

부패수사하면 트럼프 코인이나 월리파가 문제지 탈중앙화에 이바지한 코인이 문제가 될까? 전 아니라고 봄.

❤63👍8🙏2

6 Nov 2026, 04:26 UTC≈4,160 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026

엘리자베스 워렌은 1월부터 나설 수 있음. 이미 블루 메가 쓰나미는 과하게 선 반영되었다 생각함.

❤66👍7

6 Nov 2026, 04:23 UTC≈7,490 views142 reactionsread 6 November 2026

크립토에서 용기를 가져야 할 시기 나스닥 6퍼 하락이었음 원래대로라면 6자 갔다고 생각. 민주당 식 클래리티도 할 거고, 여기 근처가 바닥은 맞는듯. 조금 더 떨어질 수도 있겠지만, 롱 편향적 사고를 하는 게 유효하다고 생각함. (코인 한정)

🔥87❤37👍8👏6😱4

6 Nov 2026, 01:06 UTC≈4,170 views73 reactionsread 6 November 2026

그래 코인판에서 꺼져줘라 트재앙아

❤73

6 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC≈3,210 views52 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @yejune1Photo

📢 [속보] 트럼프 미디어, 비트코인 보유량 99.99% 전량 매도! 트럼프 미디어(Trump Media)가 보유 중이던 비트코인 4,259개(약 3억 4,367만 달러 규모)를 대부분 처분한 것으로 나타났습니다. 이번 매각은 민주당이 트럼프 일가와 암호화폐 산업 간의 자금 흐름 및 금융 연관성에 대한 고강도 조사를 착수하려는 시점에 맞춰 이루어졌습니다. 이로써 트럼프 미디어는 과거 2025년 한때 평가액이 무려 14억 달러(약 1조 9,000억 원)에 달했던 비트코인 보유 자산의 99.99%를 사실상 전량 현금화(리퀴데이션) 완료했습니다.

😱27❤19👏5👍1

6 Nov 2026, 00:03 UTC≈4,230 views57 reactionsread 6 November 2026

민주당 규제에서 가장 자유로운 코인이 도지 $0.14 일 때 시총과 똑같으면 평가절하된 코인 아닌가? 전 매우 싸다고 생각합니다. 네러티브로만 오른 거도 아니고, 오직 한 코인만 들고 가야된다면 zec 하나

❤57

5 Nov 2026, 21:27 UTC≈2,990 views49 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @small_stock

미국 주식 시장 2.8조 달러 증발 역사상 가장 큰 하루 손실 2위는 코로나 기간 2.69억 달러 역사의 힌 장면을 살고 있네

❤49

Showing the 12 most recent of 407 posts we hold for @degen2468. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@degen2468 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTCAnonymous Poll990 voters

조커로 닉을 바꿀까요

  1. 그냥 둬라88%
  2. 아니나 참신하다15%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 407 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 93 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

생각 정리하는 방
@Thoughts_BFox · 15,053
12 posts
글러먹은 뭉치들
@TradingLiteKR · 2,955
12 posts
카이에 de market
@cahier_de_market · 23,067
7 posts
김치터미널
@KimchiTerminal · 6,082
6 posts
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,136
6 posts
Macro Jungle | micro lens
@Macrojunglemicrolens · 22,977
5 posts
미친개병신새끼도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,403
5 posts
해랑달‘s Takes & Notes
@newmoneymovesio · 5,099
5 posts
FinancialJuice
@FinancialJuice · 8,375
4 posts
한투증권 미국/중국전략 정정영
@G2strategy · 16,669
4 posts
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,272
4 posts
프리라이프
@free_life59 · 12,710
4 posts
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,251
4 posts
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,014
4 posts
64비트사령부⚡️ 🇰🇷🇺🇸
@BTCpentagon · 6,560
3 posts
Walter Bloomberg
@WalterBloomberg · 33,722
3 posts
Beyond Somewhere
@beyondsomewhere · 20
3 posts
나박 AI : 제일 빠른 진짜 중요한 외신 속보
@coinaiai_report · 2,181
3 posts
돈타쿠
@dontak00 · 14,782
3 posts
미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 73,819
3 posts
카스타드 잘하는집.ai
@kastardgood · 6,260
3 posts
Big Liquidations
@BigLiquid · 6,681
2 posts
Polaristimes
@The_MariTimes · 7,561
2 posts
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,195
2 posts
coin500bking
@coin500Bking · 18,364
2 posts
CryptoMouse's View
@cryptomouseview · 3,302
2 posts
💯똥밭에 굴러도 주식판
@daegurr · 23,733
2 posts
AWAKE - 실시간 주식 공시 정리채널
@darthacking · 65,589
2 posts
📒 DONS NOTE - 투자이야기
@dons_note · 1,278
2 posts
도파민 연구소
@dopamineonchain · 5,342
2 posts
이그전 (이은택의 그림 전략)
@egzion · 22,861
2 posts
💻반도체 소부장💻[그로쓰리서치]
@growth_semi · 8,658
2 posts
한국경제
@hankyung_fin · 12,685
2 posts
Ian's Intel
@iansintel · 15,557
2 posts
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,733
2 posts
미국코인
@rolypopa · 10,637
2 posts
CTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,143
2 posts
매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,441
2 posts
토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,097
1 post
bite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,618
1 post
블록미디어
@blockmedia · 32,983
1 post
차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,096
1 post
딘스티커 Dean's Ticker
@d_ticker · 16,130
1 post
단독 & 속보 뉴스 콜렉터
@dada_news2 · 6,019
1 post
우주방산AI로봇 아카이브
@defence_24 · 10,135
1 post
degen trading
@degentradinghouse · 7,810
1 post
돌찬 공지방
@dolchanchain · 5,651
1 post
DS Tech 이수림
@dssemicon · 5,772
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“디젠의 트레이딩 일지” (@degen2468), 12,896 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/degen2468.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.