라이터 이거 무적방어뭐냐?

Channel
채저시급 김으악ㅠ
@Ugh_HH
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,823subscribers
-363 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001207868729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ugh_HH |
| Description | 모든 문의는 김으악👉🏻 @udiopop |
| Created | 10 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 41 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ugh_HH |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:40 | 9,823 | -20 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 21:50 | 9,843 | -21 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 9,864 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:51 | 9,868 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:06 | 9,882 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 9,890 | -12 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 9,902 | -16 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 08:22 | 9,918 | -16 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 9,934 | -112 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 09:57 | 10,046 | -9 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 10,055 | -9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:01 | 10,064 | -6 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:21 | 10,070 | -17 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:16 | 10,087 | -7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 10,094 | -17 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 10,111 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 10,118 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 10,128 | -7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:26 | 10,135 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 10,145 | first reading |
Engagement
687 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.76%
- avg views ÷ 9,823 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 173
- 117 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.765%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 117
- of 687 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 117 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 687 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 20,234 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 21:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,600
- Videos
- ≈762
- Links
- ≈17,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4m 54s
- Average length
- 37s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 44 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 42.1% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 16.8% | |
| 🖕 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 6.32% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 6.32% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 3.16% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 2.11% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.05% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 50 of the 687 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 687 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 117 posts held from the last 30 days (1.71%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
나스닥이 자ㅑ 나도 자요..
나스닥 여기서 더 내리는게 말이 안되는거아니낙요 진지학[
엄마아빠미안해요효도하고싶었어요
앱삭합니다 수고해라
ㅈㄴ 진짜 롱이라고 믿는데 솔직히 진짜 무서운 점은 다들 롱 이라고 생각한다는거야 다들 하따각만 본다는 게 무섭노
라이터 든든하노
트럼프가 이란에 핵날리면 그냥 maga가입합니다
이란, 호르무즈 해협 재개방 거부 1. 알마야딘에 따르면, 레자이와 푸틴 간 회담의 핵심 의제는 이란 전쟁 종식 2. 이란은 자국이 제시한 7가지 조건이 충족되기 전까지 호르무즈 해협을 폐쇄 상태로 유지하겠다는 입장 3. 호르무즈 해협 재개방 문제에 대해서는 협상 자체를 거부하며 강경한 태도를 보이고 있음 그냥 어차피 중간선거도 졌겠다 내가 앱삭 할게 핵 시원하게 날리자 트럼프야 😡😡😡 핵 날리고 걍 호르무즈 미국 51번째 주로 하자
친구가 빅스텝이라고 튀라고 할 대 튈걸 엄마가 익절하는 거 어땟냐고 햇을 때 엄마말 들을걸 엄마말들을걸 여동생이 비트마인 판다햇을 때 다팔ㄹ걸
기도합시다 이 싸패야
코인 망했네요 질서잇는 퇴장 부탁드립니다
👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 687 posts we hold for @Ugh_HH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
비트코인의 운명
- 75K를 깨고 오른다27%
- 75K를 안깨고 오른다30%
- 70K 까지 깬다16%
- 이번 하락으로 60K 간다27%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 687 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@coinforus · 124 posts호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3462 postsBQ
@BQTelegram · 9,7541 post아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,8421 post팩머 크립토
@FackMeo · 1,3141 post옹살랜드
@OngsalYee · 6,1651 post에어드랍스토리 : 코린이가 이것저것 알게되었다.
@airdropstoryKOR · 851 postAri의 Web3 탐구생활
@ariadne_scrap · 5251 post3회차 230만불->0원부터 다시 시작하기..
@crypty2017 · 8081 postPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,5401 postTrends & Tips 😎⚡️
@honeylifetip · 9,3821 post헤다 아카이브
@imhedacool · 3,8361 post여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8041 postWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 23,3001 post묻따방 🐕
@mootda · 19,7281 post우사기짱의 비밀동굴🐰
@raelinpalebluedot · 3791 post시팡이 공부방~~❤️
@sipangE · 4,3441 postSP CRYPTO CHANNEL 정보방
@spcryptochannel · 671 post💎 탑골공원
@topgolpark · 1591 post메타부 스토리
@x2emeta · 3,5531 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@gotnommed · 3129 posts라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,8985 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,3723 posts크립토마카세
@cryptomacase · 10,9113 postsMidnight Network 한국 공지 채널
@midnight_kor · 3,2903 posts춘식 뿜🧂
@ChunsikPark · 422 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,2732 posts불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,7102 posts여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,8042 posts쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,5262 posts조안 vc5444.com
@zhishizhiyun · 2,9082 postsBRILLER
@BRILLER_Research · 17,9891 post조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,9161 postGMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,1751 post이니셜 영투한
@Initial02Han · 8,9571 postNodo의 부두술
@Roh0517 · 2,5821 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,5001 postBuy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,3131 postbite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,6181 post크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,1361 post싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,0421 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,8991 post미친개병신새끼도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,4031 post다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 3,0411 post텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,6201 post불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,2111 post고따 일기장
@goraetrackerKR · 7,5421 post희단이 메모장
@heedan_memo · 4,7981 post종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 10,3221 post룰루비데
@lululaladick · 2,3721 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2461 post머니스택
@money0stack9Notice · 7,8731 post머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,7051 post신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,4271 post매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,4641 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,273
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@twitchoong · 78,515
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,620
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“채저시급 김으악ㅠ” (@Ugh_HH), 9,823 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ugh_HH.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.