Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 채저시급 김으악ㅠ

Channel

채저시급 김으악ㅠ

@Ugh_HH

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,046subscribers

-140 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001207868729
TypeChannel
Username@Ugh_HH
Created10 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Ugh_HH

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,04610,19310,119.56 August 2026 — 10,186 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,193 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,184 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,183 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,190 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,187 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,180 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,183 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,175 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,173 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,162 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,145 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,149 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,151 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,148 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,145 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,135 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,128 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,118 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,111 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,094 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,087 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,070 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,064 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,055 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,046 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,024–10,215 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:5710,046-9
16 Sept 2026, 05:5710,055-9
14 Sept 2026, 12:0110,064-6
12 Sept 2026, 23:2110,070-17
11 Sept 2026, 02:1610,087-7
8 Sept 2026, 06:1710,094-17
4 Sept 2026, 22:5810,111-7
3 Sept 2026, 09:0610,118-10
2 Sept 2026, 02:3810,128-7
1 Sept 2026, 03:2610,135-10
31 Aug 2026, 00:3610,145-3
29 Aug 2026, 21:2510,148-3
28 Aug 2026, 23:3510,151-1
28 Aug 2026, 02:3510,152+3
27 Aug 2026, 02:1410,149+4
25 Aug 2026, 00:2810,145-7
23 Aug 2026, 13:3910,152-10
22 Aug 2026, 00:4510,162-11
20 Aug 2026, 15:5510,173-2
19 Aug 2026, 17:0310,175first reading

Engagement

570 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.84%
avg views ÷ 10,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
286
213 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.723%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
213
of 570 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 213 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held570 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total60,849
Reactions total41
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 54s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

86 reactions across 39 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3641.9%
👍1618.6%
🖕1112.8%
😁66.98%
😭33.49%
🙏33.49%
❤‍🔥22.33%
👎22.33%
😘22.33%
🤣22.33%
🙊11.16%
🤬11.16%
🤷11.16%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 570 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 570 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC275 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026

참치 걍 입에서 호로록 넘어가지 않음? ㅈㄷㄷㄷ 난 참치 느끼하다고 생각해본 적 없음 해동되어서 나온 참치는 해동된 나론대로 맛있고 얼려잇믄 참치는 얼려잇는대로 맛있고(녹으면 노맛이긴함) ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 으어 참치 또묵고싶다

1

28 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC298 viewsread 29 August 2026

어허 술 먹지 마세요 술마시면 폭삭 늙는다 하네오 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ

28 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC312 viewsread 29 August 2026

어허.. 정신은 멀쩡합니다 아오 참치먹지말걸 뭔 참치 먹자마자 뜩락하노 아 어이없네 진짜

28 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC332 viewsread 29 August 2026

이거지 지금 오르는 게 국채 바이백 어쩌구 하면서 미국 어쩌구 테더 어쩌구인데 미국이 안전하면 좋겠냐 ㅡㅡ 정신들 차리거 작작해라 당장 올려라

28 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC283 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @Roh0517

워시햄이 미국은 사푸입니다 하면 비트에는 안조음..

28 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC312 viewsread 29 August 2026

아니 뭏가가 부정적이겟지 긍정적이겠어? 장난하지마세요

28 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC343 views10 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

얘들아 나 컴퓨터 모니터가 갑자기 안 켜지는데 이거 어떡함??ㅠㅠ

🖕10

Showing the 12 most recent of 570 posts we hold for @Ugh_HH. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

아물렷당 🍕
@gotnommed · 240
8 posts
라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,980
5 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,973
3 posts
Midnight Network 한국 공지 채널
@midnight_kor · 3,512
3 posts
춘식 뿜🧂
@ChunsikPark · 37
2 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,139
2 posts
크립토마카세
@cryptomacase · 11,038
2 posts
여고생 코쨩👉🔕
@jkkospi · 3,710
2 posts
쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,837
2 posts
조안 vc5444.com
@zhishizhiyun · 8,575
2 posts
BRILLER
@BRILLER_Research · 18,087
1 post
조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,930
1 post
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,300
1 post
이니셜 영투한
@Initial02Han · 11,110
1 post
Nodo의 부두술
@Roh0517 · 2,568
1 post
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,171
1 post
Buy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,397
1 post
bite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,016
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 9,462
1 post
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,459
1 post
디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 11,990
1 post
도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,468
1 post
다영의 뉴스공장
@dynewscollecters · 2,836
1 post
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,467
1 post
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
1 post
불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,188
1 post
희단이 메모장
@heedan_memo · 4,880
1 post
종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 8,801
1 post
룰루비데
@lululaladick · 2,385
1 post
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,934
1 post
머니스택 공지방 - Season 2
@money0stack9Notice · 7,971
1 post
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,553
1 post
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,385
1 post
매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것
@waitstudy · 19,356
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,139
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 74,250
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 37,467
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 49,893
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“채저시급 김으악ㅠ” (@Ugh_HH), 10,046 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ugh_HH.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.