내년 추석 지옥
👍1

Channel
@lastmoneyalpha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
22,611subscribers
-490 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001678418089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lastmoneyalpha |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lastmoneyalpha |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 22,611 | -55 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 22,666 | -21 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 22,687 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:14 | 22,703 | -42 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 22,745 | -37 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 22,782 | -27 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 22,809 | -23 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:45 | 22,832 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:43 | 22,846 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 22,862 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 22,872 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:57 | 22,887 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 22,894 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 22,907 | -15 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 22,922 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 22,937 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 22,957 | -33 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 22,990 | -29 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 23,019 | -22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 23,041 | first reading |
194 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 36 of 71 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 194 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 81,309 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
188 reactions across 104 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 77.7% | |
| 👍 | 33 | 17.6% | |
| 😈 | 3 | 1.60% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 🤓 | 1 | 0.532% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.532% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 194 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 194 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
내년 추석 지옥
👍1
원피스 나이키 프로모 카드 탑골공원 에디션 실화? https://t.me/limelight_chat/113542
🐳 9월 18일, 대한민국에 협곡이 열립니다! 드디어 리프트바운드의 한국 정식 출시일이 공개되었습니다. 2026년 9월 18일부터 한국어판 첫 세트 「오리진」을 만나볼 수 있습니다! 📌 한국 출시 기념 이벤트 📍 Gen.G GGX • 09.18 ~ 09.23 📍 아이파크몰 용산점 3층 도파민 스테이션 • 09.18 ~ 09.30 현장에서는 리프트바운드 플레이 방법을 배우고 한국어판 오리진 제품도 직접 구매할 수 있습니다. 🎴 출시 제품 • 오리진 5장입 / 14장입 부스터 팩 • 징크스 챔피언 덱 • 리 신 챔피언 덱 • 빅토르 챔피언 덱 • 4인용 세트 「증명의 전장」 • 출시 이벤트 한정 특별 아이템 🇰🇷 한국 출시 기념 특별 카드 💙 아리, 구미호 💥 징크스, 폭파광 🌪 야스오, 회한 📅 앞으로의 한국 출시 일정 • 2026년…
❤1
🐰 아슈 출근길 글로벌 경제 캘린더 📅 오늘 일정 🇺🇸 미국 🕘 01:15 ⭐ ADP 고용변화 (예상 47K) 🕘 03:00 Factory Orders m/m (예상 0.7%) 🕘 03:30 Crude Oil Inventories (예상 -0.4M) 🕘 07:00 Beige Book 🕘 22:30 Challenger Job Cuts y/y 🇨🇳 중국 🕘 14:45 RatingDog Services PMI (예상 50.6) 🇯🇵 일본 🕘 16:35 30-y Bond Auction 🇪🇺 유럽 🕘 20:15 Spanish Services PMI (예상 59.0) 🕘 20:45 Italian Services PMI (예상 53.6) 🕘 20:50 French Final Services PMI (예상 48.4) 🕘 20:55 German Fin…
📣나인그리드 미스터리 박스: 마진 방어 챌린지 - 마진이 위태로웠던 적이 있으신가요? - 포지션을 보호하기 위해 포지션 축소, 손절매 설정, 혹은 추가 마진 투입 중 어떤 방식을 선택하셨나요? - 어떤 대처 방식을 선택할 것인지 그 이유는 무엇인지 공유해 주세요! - 마감 기한: 2026년 9월 3일 16:00 (UTC+8) 🎤참여 방법 ① #AveaiGlobal 팔로우 ② 해당 게시물 리포스트 및 좋아요 ③ 댓글 작성 내용: • “마진 방어” 플랜을 가동하는 시점 • 주요 전략 • Ave 가입 이메일 주소 🎤보상 • 당첨자 10명: 각 바우처 3장 증정 • 리스크 컨트롤 마스터 1명: 바우처 5장 증정 더욱 상세한 전략을 작성할수록 “리스크 컨트롤 마스터”로 선정될 확률이 높아집니다! 📣참여링크: https://x.com/AveaiG…
❤1
[로빈후드 CEO "밈코인 보유자에 주식 토큰 에어드롭 구상"] 로빈후드(HOOD) CEO 블라드 테네프(Vlad Tenev)가 해외 팟캐스트 디 아이스드 커피 아워(The Iced Coffee Hour)에 출연해 로빈후드체인 개발자들이 밈코인과 주요 암호화폐, 주식 토큰을 결합한 금융 상품을 개발하고 있다고 밝혔다. 진서차이징에 따르면 그는 "밈코인을 보유하면 주식 토큰을 에어드롭으로 받을 수 있는 상품도 설계하고 있다"고 설명했다. 📣ave.ai 로빈후드 거래하러 가기: LINK #코인니스
320만불 -> 410만불 됨 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
🚀 $CP, 오늘 밤 Coinbase·OKX 동시 상장 예정! 분산형 AI 인프라 프로젝트 Cluster Protocol의 핵심 토큰 $CP가 오늘 밤 본격적으로 시장에 등장합니다. ⏰ 9월 2일 오후 11시 예정 🟦 Coinbase 상장 예정 ⬛️ OKX 상장 예정 🤖 Cluster Protocol란? 쉽게 말하면 중앙화된 빅테크 기업에 의존하지 않고, • AI 모델 호출 • GPU 연산 자원 대여 • 데이터셋 거래 등을 가능하게 만드는 분산형 AI 인프라 프로젝트입니다. $CP는 이 생태계에서 사용되는 핵심 유틸리티 토큰. AI 시장이 커질수록 결국 GPU·데이터·AI 모델을 누가 공급하고 연결할 것인가가 중요해질 텐데, Cluster는 이 인프라 자체를 탈중앙화하려는 그림입니다. ☕️ 한국 커뮤니티 상장 기념 이벤트도 진행 중!…
🐳 포켓몬 카드 30주년 기념 확장팩 「30th CELEBRATION」 등장! 포켓몬 카드게임의 30주년을 기념하는 특별 확장팩 「30th CELEBRATION」이 오는 9월 16일 전 세계 동시 발매됩니다! 🎟 응모 일정 • 응모 기간 : 2026.09.04(금) 00:00 ~ 09.15(화) 23:59 • 추첨 발표 : 2026.09.16(수) • 당첨자 개별 연락 📦 상품 정보 • 상품명 : 포켓몬 카드게임 MEGA 확장팩 「30th CELEBRATION」 • 발매일 : 2026.09.16(수) • 가격 : 1박스 70,000원 • 구성 : 1박스 20팩 / 1팩 6장 ✨ 이번 30주년팩이 특별한 이유 • 새로운 레어도 FUR(Futuristic Rare) 최초 등장 • FUR 등급 뮤 ex · 뮤츠 ex 수록 • 30명의 일러스…
❤3
☑️ 트위터 인증 이메일 테러 방지 방법 니키타가 알려주는 방법이라 저도 설정해두었습니다. 1️⃣ 더보기 누르고 ➡️설정누르기 2️⃣ 보안 및 계정 접근 권한 누르기 3️⃣ 비밀번호 재설정 보호 체크하기 4️⃣ 추가로 2FA 이중 보안도 설정하기 📱 참고 링크
T1 구마유시 970만원 낙찰 과연 서로 진짜 거래할 것인가
트위터 전체에 뭔 일이 일어나고 있는 모양입니다. 사람들이 패스워드 리셋하라는 메일을 엄청나게 받고 있네요. 만약 중요한 계정이 있으면 2FA 등을 켜는 등 다양한 보안책을 강구하시는 것이 좋을 것 같습니다.
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 194 posts we hold for @lastmoneyalpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lastmoneyalpha named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Web3 & TCG & AI 막돈방” (@lastmoneyalpha), 22,611 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lastmoneyalpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.