달러 3개월 동안 11% 하락함📉 조금 탄탄한 알트
❤4👍2⚡1

Channel
@cobacknamannounce
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
18,461subscribers
-1,160 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001770920592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cobacknamannounce |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cobacknamannounce |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 18,461 | -165 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 18,626 | -171 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 18,797 | -170 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 18,967 | -161 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 09:19 | 19,128 | -277 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 16:57 | 19,405 | -172 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 19,577 | -50 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 19,627 | -53 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:29 | 19,680 | -41 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:07 | 19,721 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 19,761 | -42 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 19,803 | -58 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 19,861 | -40 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 19,901 | -31 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 19,932 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 19,945 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 19,964 | -21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 19,985 | -42 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 20,027 | -25 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 20,052 | first reading |
255 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 255 (4 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 75,494 |
| Reactions total | 459 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,453 reactions across 234 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,537 | 44.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,077 | 31.2% | |
| 👏 | 333 | 9.64% | |
| ⚡ | 260 | 7.53% | |
| 🔥 | 96 | 2.78% | |
| ❤🔥 | 62 | 1.80% | |
| 🤩 | 20 | 0.579% | |
| 💋 | 18 | 0.521% | |
| 🙏 | 15 | 0.434% | |
| 😐 | 12 | 0.348% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 0.232% | |
| 🐳 | 5 | 0.145% | |
| 🌭 | 4 | 0.116% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 0.116% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.029% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.029% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
달러 3개월 동안 11% 하락함📉 조금 탄탄한 알트
❤4👍2⚡1
도대체 지금 원화가 얼마나 강한거야..? 환율 1360원 깨졌었네요
👍2⚡1❤1
OKX 부스트, 허들이 엄청 낮아졌습니다✔️ 이제 지갑 조금만 사용했어도 다 받아가요 ! 기존 500불 거래했어야 에어드랍 받았는데 이제 100불만 거래했어도 에어드랍 줍니다. ➡️CP 에어드랍 받으러가기
👏5❤4👍2
밈코어가 뭐 또 준비하고있나보네요✔️ 영상은 마법, 판타지 관련 컨셉인 것 같은데 KBW가 다가오고 익숙한 영상 속 공간이네요.. 설마? ➡️트윗 원문
❤5👍2⚡1
RISEX, 8월 리캡 및 주요 업데이트✔️ 요약👀 - XAU, QQQ 등 주요 RWA 토큰화 주식 상장 - 모바일 UI/UX 개편, 순마진, 빌더 코드 추가 - 생태계 Phase 1 온보딩 - 총 거래량 7.5B, RWA 거래량 1.64B - 총 수수료 수입 2.33M - 총 활성화 계정 10,000개 돌파 ➡️RISEX 10% 부스터 받으러가기
👍3❤2🔥1
럼프형이 다 된 밥에 재를 뿌렸구나❔ 요즘 AI 영상 만드는데 빠져사는 중 시간이 이렇게 빨리갈 수가 없네..
👍6❤2⚡1
이번 주 알트들의 토큰 언락이 역대급이라는데.. $HYPE : $797M 언락 예정 (공급량의 4.5%) $SUI : $9.7M 언락 예정 (공급량의 0.3%) $EIGEN : $6.9M 언락 예정 (공급량의 4.1%) $ENA : $6.0M 언락 예정 (공급량의 0.4%) $GPS : $1.6M 언락 예정 (공급량의 2.8%) $ZETA $1.4M 언락 예정 (공급량의 2.9%) $IOTA : $492K 언락 예정 (공급량의 0.3%) $W : $473K 언락 예정 (공급량의 0.8%) 👉원문 #언락
⚡1❤1👍1
⚠️ NordVPN의 다크웹 모니터(Dark Web Monitor)가 500만 개 이상의 이메일 주소가 유출됐을 가능성을 감지
⚡1❤1👍1
진짜 뭐시 막 오고있었네
❤4👍1
트위터 전체에 뭔 일이 일어나고 있는 모양입니다. 사람들이 패스워드 리셋하라는 메일을 엄청나게 받고 있네요. 만약 중요한 계정이 있으면 2FA 등을 켜는 등 다양한 보안책을 강구하시는 것이 좋을 것 같습니다.
👏4⚡2❤1👍1
☑️연준 금리 인상 가능성 66% 트레이더들은 이제 연방준비제도가 이달에 25베이시스포인트 금리 인상을 단행할 가능성을 66% 이상으로 보고 있음. 케빈 와시(Kevin Warsh)의 매파적 잭슨 홀 발언 이후 금리 인상 기대치가 상승함. 단 일주일 전만 해도 시장은 9월 인상 확률을 40% 이였음. #금리
❤5⚡2👏2👍1
코백남 박터지는 경매 들어가나 모든 수익은 코백남 뱃살에 기부됩니다 https://t.me/cobacknamannounce
👍8⚡1❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @cobacknamannounce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코백남 공지방” (@cobacknamannounce), 18,461 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cobacknamannounce.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.