왓쳐그루(WatcherGuru) 메시지: 미국 상품선물거래위원회CFTC) 암호화폐 거래소가 레버리지 및 마진 거래를 제공할 수 있도록 하는 규정을 검토 중입니다. —🔗link
🥰1

Channel
@investlikejohn
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,071subscribers
-27,273 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002413545101 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @investlikejohn |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/investlikejohn |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:20 | 5,071 | -36 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 5,107 | -67 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:55 | 5,174 | -36 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 5,210 | -40 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 5,250 | -30 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 5,280 | -38 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:25 | 5,318 | -128 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:39 | 5,446 | -5,176 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 10,622 | -11,513 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 22,135 | -9,653 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 31,788 | -35 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 31,823 | -31 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 31,854 | -85 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 31,939 | -46 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 31,985 | -29 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 32,014 | -39 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 32,053 | -103 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 32,156 | -42 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 32,198 | -68 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 32,266 | first reading |
76 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 76 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 23 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 86.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 2.00% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
왓쳐그루(WatcherGuru) 메시지: 미국 상품선물거래위원회CFTC) 암호화폐 거래소가 레버리지 및 마진 거래를 제공할 수 있도록 하는 규정을 검토 중입니다. —🔗link
🥰1
CFTC 의장 오늘 발표내용 아젠다 https://www.cftc.gov/Webcast/current CFTC 1. Crypto — “From Uncertainty to Clarity” 과거 미국의 crypto 규제가 왜 엉망이었는가 주별 라이선스가 파편화된 문제 포괄적인 연방 Market Structure 법제가 없었던 문제 SEC/CFTC 등 기관의 jurisdiction 중첩 inconsistent interpretation 특히 “regulation-by-enforcement”가 산업에 끼친 악영향 그 결과 기업과 자본이 미국 밖으로 나간 문제 기존 법적 권한만으로 CFTC가 지금 당장 개선할 수 있는 것 향후 Congress의 Market Structure legislation과 CFTC 규제의 연결 crypto infrastruc…
한솔라 형님은 찐반 보시네.. 앞으로 2년은 영광스러울 것입니다. ◾️ 무리보다 더 빠르고 공격적으로 움직이세요 ◾️ 알파 플레이에 집중하세요 ◾️ 베타는 매우 선택적으로 다루세요 ◾️ 이익 실현 후 뒤돌아보지 마세요 행운을 빕니다. https://x.com/hansolar21/status/2090391389876236536?s=20 베리나 식사에서 롱치라했을때 말 들을껄 ㅅㅂ
❤4
🟢 $72,000 @bitcoin_price
[SBS] [속보] SK하이닉스 노사 임단협 잠정합의…성과급 60% 자사주로 🔗자세히 보기 📊시장 현황 📲앱 다운로드 #SK하이닉스
크라켄이 웃기긴 해…
확인을 해보니까 분당 1730주정도로 계속 정확하게 사고 있고, 종료시간에 딱 65만주 떨어지게 페이스를 이어가고 있음.
개인적으로 코인은 명분(촉매)만 있으면 오르기 좋은 상태였다고 생각하는데 이번에 달러에 대한 의심이라는 명분이 나오고 크게 오름. 엄청 강력한 촉매인가는 아직 잘 모르겠는데... 상대강도 좋던 이더가 바로 20퍼씩 오르는 것을 보니 오르기 좋은 상태는 만들어져있구나 하는 생각은 들었음. 위와 같은 생각으로 어제 돌파 롱을 쳐놓고 바로 잠을 잣는데 생각보다 크게 올라 있어서 놀람. 게다가 거래량이 실린 장대양봉으로 올린 이후에도 큰조정없이 옆으로 기는 모습을 보니... 숏은 비추천 드린다는 말씀 전합니다.
❤1
종토방 텔레 카톡 수많은 좆문가들의 얘기를 신경 쓰지 마십시오 그들은 자기가 무엇을 알고 있는지 무슨 소리를 하고 있는지 전혀 알지 못합니다 자기 자신을 믿으세요
🔥1
[속보] 트럼프, 이란에 대한 가장 파괴적인 경제 작전 발표 트럼프, "이란, 합의 이행 실패 트럼프, 전례 없는 규모의 경제 전쟁 및 고립 발언 📰원문/번역 ⚔️전쟁 상황실 📲앱 다운로드
그러니까... 비트가 12퍼 오르고 이더,하리가 20퍼센트 이상 올랐는데.. 나는 그냥 테더로 반도체 주식만 깔짝거린 병신이라는 말이냐? 코인충인데 비트이더가 없는 병신이 나라고?
❤5😁1
dtcc 10월 런칭 잊지말기 + 트럼프가 말한건 결국 스테이블코인 수요를 높이기 위함 -> 단기채 수요 증가 -> 장기채 금리 하락기대 ... 이런 메커니즘인듯 번외로.. 트럼프입에서 하이퍼리퀴드 나온거보면 제프가 진짜 말도안되게 로비친게 느껴짐 + 개인적으로 purr (밈코말고) 사고 한번 칠거같긴함
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @investlikejohn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“존토방” (@investlikejohn), 5,071 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investlikejohn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.