이거랑 비슷한 얘기같은데 과연 이더리움은 6년 횡명보를 뚫을 수 있을까? 그렇게 된다면 거의 코스피급 추세 나와줄 수 있니? 코스피처럼 만!!
❤9

Channel
@WeCryptoTogether
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
49,506subscribers
-462 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001396820120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WeCryptoTogether |
| Description | 중요하다고 생각하는 코인 소식과 공부한 자료 필터없이 나누는 채널! ✔️대화방: 스캐머가 많이 비공개로 전환 ✔️협력문의 @We_Crypto_Together |
| Created | 15 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WeCryptoTogether |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 49,506 | -28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 49,534 | -18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 49,552 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 49,568 | -14 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 49,582 | -25 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 49,607 | -37 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 49,644 | -9 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 49,653 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 49,667 | -7 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 49,674 | -32 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 49,706 | -52 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 49,758 | -21 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:38 | 49,779 | -20 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:58 | 49,799 | +12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 49,787 | -22 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 49,809 | -36 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 49,845 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 49,877 | -33 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 49,910 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 49,930 | first reading |
551 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 374 of 551 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 551 (5 August 2026 – 30 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,444,654 |
| Reactions total | 1,970 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,857 reactions across 328 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,085 | 58.4% | |
| 👍 | 355 | 19.1% | |
| 👏 | 215 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 183 | 9.85% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 1.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 374 of the 551 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,970reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 551 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WeCryptoTogether. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 551 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
이거랑 비슷한 얘기같은데 과연 이더리움은 6년 횡명보를 뚫을 수 있을까? 그렇게 된다면 거의 코스피급 추세 나와줄 수 있니? 코스피처럼 만!!
❤9
아서 헤이즈 “ETH, 이제는 ‘미움받는 랠리’ 나올 차례” 아서 헤이즈는 Pomp Podcast에서, 수년간 부진했던 이더리움이 강한 반등 구간에 들어설 수 있다고 전망함. • ETH는 오랜 기간 시장 기대를 못 받으며 상대적으로 부진 • 하지만 RWA·토큰화 내러티브가 본격화되면 기관 자금이 이더리움으로 유입될 가능성 • 기관들이 온체인 자산 발행·결제 인프라를 활용할수록 ETH 수요도 커질 수 있다는 시각 이런 의견도 있네 정도로만 참고. 이더는 과연 시동을 걸 수 있을까?
❤4
BNB는 결국 중국어 페어를 못버렸구나
❤2
바이낸스(Binance) 공지 Binance Futures Will Launch USDⓈ-Margined 牛来USDT Perpetual Contract (2026-08-30) 2026-08-30 17:35:15
❤1
근데 이거 비스므리하게 먼저 했던게 Bags임. 하지만 특유의 병신짓으로 망해버린 개쉐끼들...백스 OG 산거 결국 아무것도 안해버린 노답쉐끼..
❤6👍2
🗂 그리고 최근 로빈후드 불장은 FOMO와의 환상의 조합의 결과물인듯 펌프펀의 대항마라고 여겨지는 앱이데, 시작은 솔라나였으나 사실상 체인 추상화 트레이딩 앱에 가까움. 소셜 기능도 덧붙여서 앱 안에서 거래뿐만이 아니라 리더보드, 포트폴리오 추적 등이 가능함. 약간 토스 느낌?으로 많은 이용자를 온보딩 중임. 이 곳에서 봉크가이가 화려하게 부활하면서 현재 로빈후드 밈코인 + 유틸리티 장을 이끌고 있는 중. 못먹어서 배아픈거 맞음 음하하.
❤2
그럼에도 도파민을 충전하기 위해 밈코를 해야 한다면, 더욱 관철해야 할 생각은 단 한가지 절대 베이스를 믿지마.
👍2❤1
😋 앞으로의 시장 마인드 셋업 주말간 다양한 분야와 공부를 하면서 앞으로의 크립토 시장 투자에 대해 생각해본 것들은 정리해 보았습니다. 1️⃣ "앞으로"의 시계열은 어디인가? 저 역시 단기추세를 무시할 순 없지만, 일반인이 할 수 있는 가장 중요한 플레이는 지금 당장 $83K를 찍냐 아니냐보다 바닥 부근에 시장에 자리를 깔고 앉아 빠따 크게 잡고(레버리지 X 현물) 존버로 엑싯. 그놈의 지겨운 4년 주기, 밉지만 대비해보자면 지금은 바닥을 찾는 구간에 가깝다. 그렇다면 지금부터라도 현물 투입 및 평단을 맞춰 존버가 압도적으로 유리한 시기. 2️⃣ 모 아니면 도지만..모에 더 가깝지 않을까?(제발) 만약에 1️⃣ 을 부정한다면, 크립토가 영구 도태되는 자산이자 시장의 관심도 못받고 수년간 0에 수렴하는 자산이 되는 쪽. 하지만 최근 …
🔥11❤7
우미아는 업계 인사이더들이 화리때 큰캡으로 많이 들어가서 잘 될 것 같네요. https://t.me/Web3LearningWithInger/2066?single 원피스 보지말껄 앵무새가 싫다
❤2
오늘 있었던 사건에 대한 본인의 입장 . . . . . 생일날 여자 발가락 빤거 본인 아니라네요. 이상 인젝티브 파운더 본인의 입장이었습니다.
❤4
Rain 프로그램의 영향을 받은 모든 카드의 잔액은 전액 보상될 예정입니다. 사건의 경위와 현재 진행 상황을 안내해 드립니다. 당사의 카드 발급 파트너사인 Rain 측에서 Tria 및 다른 Rain 프로그램 카드에 사용되는 솔라나(Solana) 카드 컨트랙트의 취약점을 발견했습니다. 해당 컨트랙트는 모든 프로그램에 걸쳐 업그레이드 및 조치가 완료되었으며, 이후 추가적인 무단 활동은 발생하지 않았습니다. 고객님의 Tria 지갑은 전혀 영향을 받지 않았습니다. 지갑과 카드 잔액은 서로 다른 곳에 보관됩니다. 고객님의 지갑은 Self-custodial으로 사건 내내 고객님의 제어 하에 안전하게 유지되었습니다. 카드에 솔라나 기반 자산을 충전할 때 해당 자금은 별도의 솔라나 컨트랙트로 이동하며, 이번 사건은 오직 해당 컨트랙트에만 영향을 미쳤습…
❤1
아쉬운 소리 하는거고 저는 만화카페에서 진도 따라잡는다고 원피스 보다가 못넣었습니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 551 posts we hold for @WeCryptoTogether. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
사전조사
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
예비군 100만원 세금내면 1회 면제
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 551 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 30 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,794 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 74 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@WeCryptoTogether named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅” (@WeCryptoTogether), 49,506 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeCryptoTogether.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.