주칸형 ”메모리에 컨빅션 잃었다“

Channel
박주혁
@juhyukb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,564subscribers
-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001797237914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juhyukb |
| Description | X: https://x.com/morbid19 YT: https://www.youtube.com/@juhyuk Inquiries: @bjuhyuk |
| Created | 29 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juhyukb |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 6,564 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 6,568 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 6,572 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 6,571 | +8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 6,563 | +9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 6,554 | +18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,536 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 6,540 | -15 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 6,555 | -4 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 6,559 | -16 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 6,575 | +15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 6,560 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 6,568 | -16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 6,584 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:08 | 6,594 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 6,604 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 6,605 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 6,607 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 6,610 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 6,623 | first reading |
Engagement
104 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.3%
- avg views ÷ 6,564 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,200
- 48 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 48
- of 104 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 57,701 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,890
- Videos
- ≈189
- Links
- ≈2,110
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 27s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 48 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
9.11 everyday ✈️💥
지금 바로 코인 쳐다볼 시간
즐겨 시밯
???: 무슨 일 하세요? ???: 저 가상자산 업계에서 일해요 ???: 아 그래요 그럼 그게 뭐하는 일이에요? ???: 그냥 코인 쳐다봐요
사실 지캐시 1도 모르는데 좋은 기회로 모셔서 이야기를 나눌 수 있어서 너무 좋았습니다. 이거 녹화한 날 샀음..
지캐시의 코어 컨트리뷰터로 활동하는 데이브와 대화를 나눴습니다. 그가 왜 지캐시에 푹 빠져 사는지, 왜 지캐시가 비트코인에 대한 보험인지, 그리고 지캐시를 밀어주고 있는 인물들까지, 정말 많은 것을 배울 수 있는 자리였습니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요
오늘 사이먼님이 만드는 vooy 프리런칭 이벤트에 초대되어서 왔음 우리가 흔히 아는 에이전트 서비스를 기반으로, 인터페이스를 메신저앱처럼 만든거임 단순하게 비유하자면 그록봇이랑 텔레그램을 섞어놓은 느낌 이렇게 만든 이유는 결국 개인 에이전트도 해자가 무너질거고, 남는건 네트워크 효과밖에 없을거라고 생각해서 그렇다고 이해함 거기에 더해 서비스에 대한 연계도 현재 에이전트들이 겪는 큰 문제인데, vooy은 한국 특유의 IT 문화를 비즈니스적으로 잘 풀어내려는 노력을 하는 것으로 보임 개인적으로는 어차피 에이전트 포함 소프트웨어는 해자가 없고 진짜 남은건 관계라는 것, 그리고 여기에 에이전트를 얹어서 기존 앱들보다 더 뛰어난 유저경험을 제공하려는 시도를 하는 것이 굉장히 인상적이었음
원맨쇼 지렸습니다
📣 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 보도, 참고자료 코인과세가 2년 공식 유예되었습니다. 여당, 야당 모두 당대표가 공식 건의하고 행정부까지 동의했습니다. 세법개정안 개정은 확정이고 연말 표결만 거치면 됩니다. 2년 유예와 함께, 3년간의 손실 이월공제도 재정경제부 발표에 포함되었습니다. 대한민국 공식 전자정부 누리집 재정경제부 부총리 브리핑 자료 원문보러가기 정말 수고 많으셨습니다. 트위터에도 올려놨어요.
아마 크립토는 괜찮을거야
nothing matters
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @juhyukb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@catallactic · 5,1982 posts직장인투자자A🥇
@jiktooofficial · 1,1372 postsTo The Mars🚀
@tothemarsssss · 162 posts슬기로운 HODL생활
@SOLful_hodl_life · 1,7581 post토큰투칸
@TokenTucan · 4301 post토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,0971 post아치 네트워크
@archkorea · 3061 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0961 post크립토 번역공장
@coinsaywhat · 9,3561 post슈빛랜드-베모닝단
@coinsohard · 7431 postZ's Reading Dump
@cryptoarchive_by_z · 281 post크공집 (크립토로 공덕역에 집사기)
@cryptonyong · 2141 postDaniel Social Club
@danielsocialclub · 4,5321 post돌찬 공지방
@dolchanchain · 5,6511 post미친개병신새끼도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,4031 post민서 생각
@followminseo · 51 postHybiscus Original 🌺
@hybiscusxyz · 4661 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2511 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,4171 post원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 14,9821 post오렌지 연합 🟧
@orange_alliance · 1,5661 post사카밤바스피스 낙서장
@otakurypto · 5911 post메모장
@qoodong · 31 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,297
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,983
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,459
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@murphybus · 19,930
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,135
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,014
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@toncoin_kr · 23,006
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,946
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,459
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,228
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@twitchoong · 78,476
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,734
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@airdr0p_lab · 20,494
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,359
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@layergg · 19,323
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,273
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“박주혁” (@juhyukb), 6,564 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juhyukb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.