지캐시 관련 게시글 하나만 더 올라오면 100만불 롱쳐서 좆되게 만들겠습니다 그만 올리시길 부탁드리겠습니다
😁11❤3

Channel
@doratman18
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,403subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001864238560 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @doratman18 |
| Description | 크립토 수어사이드 스쿼드 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/doratman18 |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:28 | 9,403 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:56 | 9,398 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 9,407 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 9,413 | +8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:00 | 9,405 | +8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 9,397 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:34 | 9,403 | +52 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 9,351 | -9 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 16:40 | 9,360 | -16 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:42 | 9,376 | -41 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 9,417 | -51 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 9,468 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 9,482 | -15 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 9,497 | -36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:53 | 9,533 | -14 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 9,547 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 9,553 | -9 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:55 | 9,562 | +66 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 9,496 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 9,503 | first reading |
189 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 50 of 75 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 189 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 124,266 |
| Reactions total | 364 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 22:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,265 reactions across 123 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 851 | 67.3% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 5.30% | |
| 👏 | 62 | 4.90% | |
| 🤯 | 46 | 3.64% | |
| 💩 | 38 | 3.00% | |
| 🤬 | 24 | 1.90% | |
| 🤣 | 23 | 1.82% | |
| 💯 | 22 | 1.74% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 1.74% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 1.66% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 0.949% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 0.791% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 0.791% | |
| 🤡 | 10 | 0.791% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 0.632% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.553% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 0.553% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.553% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 0.474% | |
| 🤷♂ | 5 | 0.395% | |
| 5 further kinds | 7 | 0.553% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 189 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,276 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 189 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 76 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
지캐시 관련 게시글 하나만 더 올라오면 100만불 롱쳐서 좆되게 만들겠습니다 그만 올리시길 부탁드리겠습니다
😁11❤3
진짜 긍정회로 만땅 돌려보면 지금같은 시장에 계속 수요가 엄청 날거다라고 해석될수도 있음 근데 3d dram 자체가 사실 난이도가 매우 높아서 당장이 뭔가 할 수 있는건 아닌데..
❤2
이것은 두가지 중 하나로 해석 가능 1. 메모리가 진짜 존나 부족하다 2. 메모리 3사 좆됐다고 복창해라
❤8
TSMC 메모리 만든다네요. *메모리 만들 계획을 한다네요
❤2
이제 슬슬 항복하고 있습니다 도랏맨이 항복했고 주칸도 항복했습니다 남은 램혁수 있나요?
주칸형 ”메모리에 컨빅션 잃었다“
안녕하세요 돈도 잃고해서 도랏맨 굿즈 후드티를 출시해서 맨징하려고합니다 디올과 협업해서 진행하고 가격은 697.4만원입니다 많관부
❤4
현재까지 외국인 순매도 코스피 순매도 2조5천억 SK하이닉스 순매도 9906억 (38.9%) 삼성 순매도 1846억 (7.2%)
❤3
인수됐고 + 하락장에도 버티거나 오른다 = 공개매수한다 간단한 법칙인가봄
이재명 대통령님이 이 자리에서 집을 파신돈으로 한국주식을 매수하면서 최태원 모먼트를 보여준다면
👍9
텍사스 주지사 당선자 지나 히노호사: "우리는 텍사스 주민들을 보호할 수 있는 대책이 마련될 때까지 데이터 센터 관련 사업을 중단해야 합니다." - CNN 인터뷰 텍사스 주지사 당선자 지나 히노호사: 데이터 센터를 혐오하지 마세요. 텍사스 주민들을 어떻게 이용하는지를 혐오해야 합니다. - CNN 인터뷰 텍사스 주지사 당선인 지나 히노호사: 우리는 머스크와 그의 회사들과 우리 조건 하에 강력한 협력 관계를 구축할 수 있습니다. - CNN 인터뷰 => 말 잘 들으라는 소리인듯
❤6
냉정하게 지금 생각해보면 관세 때로 봐야할 것 같음 관세 때에는 조금 더 선명한 걱정 + 앞으로 나빠질거라는 걱정(기업들 이익 추정치 하락) 지금도 데센 규제 걱정 + 이로 인해서 기업들의 이익추정치 하락 걱정 비슷하다고 생각. 하지만 지금 민주당이 트럼프 보다 늦게 대응할 수도 있고(안할수도 있음) 확실성이 없는 리스크는 더 무섭기 때문에..
❤11
Showing the 12 most recent of 189 posts we hold for @doratman18. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“미친개병신새끼도랏맨” (@doratman18), 9,403 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/doratman18.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.