https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/117566560747501657

Channel
갱생코인
@gensencoin
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,800subscribers
+722 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001230780667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @gensencoin |
| Description | ⊹⁺˖໋̟⸝⸝ 𑣧⃙̴ཻ̑꙯⃩⃔⃕͡᷍ ⸝⸝𑌻̢⸝̠⸝⃬⸝ 𑣧⃙̴ཻ̑꙯⃩⃔⃕͡᷍ ⸝⸝ ᘁᩚ ˖ᕀ⸜̑⸝͂˖⁺໋̟⊹ |
| Created | 19 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/gensencoin |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 14,800 | -16 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:19 | 14,816 | +7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:48 | 14,809 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:48 | 14,813 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 15:56 | 14,821 | -14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:45 | 14,835 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:39 | 14,839 | +7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:18 | 14,832 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:04 | 14,835 | -17 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 14,852 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:19 | 14,864 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:17 | 14,871 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:05 | 14,876 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:10 | 14,884 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:01 | 14,890 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:57 | 14,905 | -18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 14,923 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 14,939 | -10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 14,949 | -8 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 14,957 | first reading |
Engagement
136 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.1%
- avg views ÷ 14,800 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,980
- 43 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.059%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 43
- of 136 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 136 (27 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 128,014 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,850
- Videos
- ≈261
- Links
- ≈6,260
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 18s
- Average length
- 26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
106 reactions across 37 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤓 | 106 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (11.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
슬슬 올라오네: "모든게 거짓말이었다"
엄
<미라 네트워크, AI 추론 신뢰 문제 겨냥한 '스털링' 출시> - 같은 AI 모델이라도 어느 업체를 거치느냐에 따라 실제 성능이 달라질 수 있음 - gpt-oss-120b 벤치마크 기준 동일 모델 제공 업체별 점수 편차: 36.7% ~ 93.3% - 문제는 이용자가 이 차이를 체감하기 어렵다는 점임 (모델명만 같고 실행 환경은 제각각) - 미라 네트워크(Mira Network)가 AI 추론 서비스 스털링(Sterling)을 출시함 - 모델 제공업체를 직접 검증 → 통과한 업체를 통해서만 추론 서비스 제공 - 모델 성능뿐 아니라 제공 서비스의 신뢰성이 경쟁 요소로 부상하는 흐름 유저가 업체별 품질을 일일이 비교할 필요 없이, 검증을 통과한 추론 결과만 받는 구조라서 "모델 이름만 믿고 쓰다 성능 손해 보는 문제"를 서비스 단에서 걷어낸다…
지금 존나 이해 안되는거: SOXL가격, CARDS가격
재경부 여기는 2026년에 굴림체를 어떻게 구해서 쓰고 있는거죠???? 진짜 독하다 독해
에휴 자살~
그래도 업비트 뒷지갑 대신 불개미 뒷구녕에 기부한 보람이 있네요
불개미는 2028 과세유예 시위로 돌아올 것입니다 그동안 보내주신 성원에 감사드립니다
에휴… 축하는 뭔 축하에요 쩝
그냥 그때그때 기분따라 폰트 바꿔가면서 올리는거구나 진짜일수도~ 요즘 하도 이런거에 많이 속아서 의심부터 하게된달까...
유출이라는건 기자가 엠바고 깨고 흘린거임? 근데 최근 다른 보도자료랑 폰트가 왜 다름???
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @gensencoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @gensencoin as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 12 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,1274 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,4174 posts잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,8114 posts30대에 은퇴번복한 머피
@murphybus · 19,9303 posts🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,2943 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,2732 posts여름 블록체인
@crypto_summer_node · 4512 posts종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 10,3172 posts쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,5262 posts인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 8,0372 posts기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2512 posts마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,4032 postsBQ
@BQTelegram · 9,7541 post덱헌의 코인 커뮤니티
@DEXhunter11 · 2,5561 postEden 항해일지
@Edenmadoros · 2381 post꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,1141 post매틱스의 연구소
@MATIXLABS · 7501 postNFT Kor with Shrimp
@NFTKor · 1,8621 post세나 리서치
@ResearchSena · 11,4831 post사랑방🍬(CRYPTO ALPHA)
@Sarangbang_Crypto · 8,5391 post거인의 어깨
@SellSeeShoulder · 4411 postAI-meda Research
@aimedaresearch · 8601 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4941 post에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,3191 post코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,4281 post코읽남
@coiknam3000 · 21 post크립토 번역공장
@coinsaywhat · 9,3561 post크립토파즈(Cryptopaz)
@cryptopaz0 · 10,4711 post왕베이
@cryptowangbei · 7,0831 post싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,0341 post미친개병신새끼도랏맨
@doratman18 · 9,4031 post낭랑화의 경제이야기
@economicrypto · 6,4071 post돈미새 윾수
@eksoo_announce · 1,2861 post전업스캠투자자_정보방
@fulltime_scam · 601 post희단이의 Web3 꿀정보 공지방
@heedan22 · 8,0621 post호들 공유방
@hodlshare · 291 post숙제를 합시다
@homeworkgogo · 6,4661 post다시는 개잡알트 줍지 않겠습니다
@jyaeng · 21 post이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,4091 post룰루비데
@lululaladick · 2,3691 post마인부우의 크립토볼
@minebuu_cryptoball · 10,7331 post🐸 NFT 디젠 정보방 🐸
@nftdegeninfo · 7471 post빛나는 지금 ☀️
@nowlsthebrightest · 8941 post핑핑이의 투자일기 🐱
@pingping2investment · 1091 postsuperowl8380
@superowl8380 · 21 post신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,4271 posttoby everypto
@tobyeverypto · 51 post빌더가 되고싶은 참김방
@tunakimbab · 1551 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@minchoisfuture · 15,4174 postsMlm onchain
@mlmonchain · 28,7433 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,2732 postsCryptoMouse's View
@cryptomouseview · 3,3022 posts불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,7342 posts나무위키 실검 알려주는 채널
@namuhotnow · 1,1082 postsNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,2281 post돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,2141 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4941 post토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,0971 postbite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,6181 postDefiLlama Official Round Up
@defillama_tg · 21,7781 post불개미 시황 + 뻘글 + 살려줘
@fireantrade · 3,2111 post개미굴 - 햇제 팝업스토어
@gaemigool · 1,6601 postHyperliquid Announcements
@hyperliquid_announcements · 26,8681 post기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,2511 post무온적 사고 - AI, 명상, 밈
@muohnism · 5211 postPONS_Buybot
@ponsbuy_bot · 61 post어이 청진기
@rising_090 · 3,2791 post스몰인사이트리서치
@smallinsightresearch · 5,8211 post타이거리서치 | Tiger Research Reports
@tiger_research · 1,9071 post신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,4271 post🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,2941 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@gensencoin named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 15 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 3 posts, 15 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@shrimp_notice · 28,359
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,734
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,273
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@murphybus · 19,930
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@magonia_b · 26,251
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,459
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,946
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,297
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,096
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@mujammin123 · 25,811
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@marshallog · 21,403
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@airdrop_kor · 21,319
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
@layergg · 19,323
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,459
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@toncoin_kr · 23,006
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,228
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@Bounty_ATM · 25,845
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
@BChoSN · 26,372
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@twitchoong · 78,476
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@blockmedia · 32,983
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,641
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@tlsrltnf · 22,427
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“갱생코인” (@gensencoin), 14,800 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/gensencoin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.