데뎃..?
❤1

Channel
@magonia_b
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,251subscribers
-1,151 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001652098893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @magonia_b |
| Description | 오르락내리락 우리네 일상 음흉한 채팅 : https://t.me/magoniabb X : https://x.com/magonia_B Thread : https://www.threads.com/@happymagon Trade. Defined ReboundX : https://www.reboundx.net/en |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/magonia_b |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:10 | 26,251 | +5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 18:51 | 26,246 | -18 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 16:54 | 26,264 | -40 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:01 | 26,304 | -263 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 26,567 | -19 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:49 | 26,586 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 26,596 | -18 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:31 | 26,614 | -171 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:59 | 26,785 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:05 | 26,794 | +3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 26,791 | -13 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:59 | 26,804 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 26,809 | -2 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:20 | 26,811 | +16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:07 | 26,795 | -24 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 26,819 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 26,821 | -13 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:17 | 26,834 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 26,841 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:05 | 26,843 | first reading |
801 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 224 of 283 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 801 (5 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 373,522 |
| Reactions total | 1,320 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 05:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,984 reactions across 586 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,964 | 74.4% | |
| 👍 | 384 | 9.64% | |
| 🔥 | 223 | 5.60% | |
| 🤣 | 79 | 1.98% | |
| 👎 | 67 | 1.68% | |
| 😁 | 51 | 1.28% | |
| 🤯 | 45 | 1.13% | |
| 👏 | 44 | 1.10% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 0.628% | |
| 😭 | 24 | 0.602% | |
| 💩 | 22 | 0.552% | |
| 🤡 | 13 | 0.326% | |
| 😇 | 12 | 0.301% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 0.151% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.126% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.1% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.075% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.05% | |
| 6 further kinds | 7 | 0.176% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 610 of the 801 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 801 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 21 of 283 posts held from the last 30 days (7.42%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
데뎃..?
❤1
TSMC 메모리 만든다네요. *메모리 만들 계획을 한다네요
🤡3👏1
America is strong?
😱 미국 고용 지수 예상치 상회 금리 인하는 물 건너갔다 그죠??
❤7
프리랜서로서 자신을 어떻게 브랜딩하면 좋을까? 1. 세일즈는 골프와 많이 닮았다. 불가능해 보일 만큼 복잡하게 만들 수도 있고, 그냥 다가가서 공을 치면 되는 일로 만들 수도 있다. 나는 거의 20년간 세일즈 조직을 이끌고 만들어왔는데, 내 조언이라면 그저 다가가서 공을 치라는 것이다. 2. 세일즈는 사람에 관한 일이고, 문제 해결에 관한 이야기다. 솔루션이나 기술, 화학약품이나 코드 몇 줄, 아티초크에 관련된 것이 아니다. 사람과 관련이 있는곳이고, 문제를 푸는 일이 핵심이다. 3. 사람들이 사는 건 네 가지, 오직 네 가지뿐이다. 언제나 그렇다. 그 네 가지는 시간, 돈, 섹스, 그리고 인정/마음의 평화다. 이 네 가지가 아닌 걸 팔려고 하면 실패한다. 4. 타이레놀은 사람들이 언제나 산다. 비타민은 가끔, 그리고 예측할 수 없는 …
❤5
신탁 내려왔네 440k갑니다
❤3
오늘 미장열릴때까지 심심한 오빠있어?😍 여방장 대기중 너만 오면 고 오늘 속쓸 없는 흑우없재? 속쓸 100간다 https://reboundx-floor-production.up.railway.app/
🔴 상승 · 1시간 5.13% BP $0.994260 기준: Backpack spot 교차 확인: CoinGecko, DEX meteora 2026. 11. 6. 오후 9:20:58 KST https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/backpack
❤1🔥1
📕 바이낸스 해킹 후폭풍…고팍스도 해킹 협박에 출금 중단 ✅ 국내 가상자산 거래소 고팍스가 해킹 협박 메일을 받고 긴급 보안 조치에 착수했습니다. 현재까지 실제 자산 피해는 확인되지 않았으며, 이용자 보호를 위해 출금을 일시 중단했습니다. 📂 주요 내용 - 고팍스, 11월 6일 해킹 협박 메일 수신 - 오후 2시 55분부터 가상자산 출금 중단 - 해킹 위험에 대비해 핫월렛 자산 대부분을 콜드월렛으로 이전 - 현재까지 실제 이용자 자산 피해는 없는 것으로 파악 - 고팍스는 바이낸스가 지분 67%를 보유한 국내 거래소 - 지난달 바이낸스 대규모 해킹 이후 계열 거래소 보안 우려 확대
❤2
곧 코인이 코인이 아닌 순간이 올거라 믿어의심치 않고 있음. 먹거리가 점점 생길거야 모두모두 힘내세요 열심히 같이 해봐용 시장을 떠나지말자 항상 기회는 왔다
❤21
그렇다고 해서 코인을 접을거냐? 비중이 적냐 하면 잘 모르겠음. 여전히 크립토에 자신 있고 여기서 큰 수익률을 뽑아낼 자신이 있기 때문. (비교적 전통 자산 수익률에 비해서는) 그래서 큐펙스, 앤트로피 퍼프덱스 에드작? 노출하고 있고 (각 $100K 수준) 이것 저것 리서치도 꾸준히 하고 있음. 사실 안해도 됩니다. 퍼프덱스도 점점 에어드랍이나 TGE, 수익성 면에서 불확실성이 올라가는 건 사실. 벗, 저는 하이퍼리퀴드가 망하기 전까지는 "퍼프덱스를 포함한 거래소" 메타는 끝나지 않는다고 봅니다. 현재 "마치 L2 복사 메타"라 쓰레기다, 누군가는 슬슬 비판하고 있고 실제로 돈 녹이는 사람들이 거의 사라지고 있지만 L2는 FDV $100B 짜리가 자연스러운 흐름과 성장에서 발견된 적이 없고 Revenue가 나오지도 않던 섹터임. 아이러…
민주당 블루웨이브가 미치는 크립토 영향? 민주당 상원 의원 엘리자베스 워렌이 미국 상원 은행위원회 차기 의장으로 예측되고 있음. 워렌은 암호화폐 비판가 포지션이며 클레리티의 최대 적수였음. 광범위한 금융 산업 감독, 소화 권한을 "1월"부터 얻게 됨. 그녀가 바로 착수할 것들은 다음과 같음 - 예측 시장 내부자 거래 혐의 조사 - 트럼프 가족 구성원의 부정부패 조사 - 암호화폐 회사 소비자 보호 관행 검토 - 은행과 스테이블 코인 발행 회사간의 이자지급 논쟁검토 하지만 오늘 증시가 3조달러 가까이 날아간 지금 상황에서 이미 위의 사실은 선반영 되어 있다고 보는게 현명할 것 같음. 아래에서 차트로 확인해보기 1. 나스닥100 지수가 순간적 낙폭을 -7% 기록한 반면, 비트코인은 -6%대에서 방어하는 모습을 보였음. 2. 동일 구간에서…
❤9👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 801 posts we hold for @magonia_b. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@magonia_b edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 104 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 118 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@magonia_b named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“기분좋은 마곤” (@magonia_b), 26,251 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magonia_b.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.