Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 이것저것 줍는 히키

Channel

이것저것 줍는 히키

@Hikicha0_0

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,655subscribers

-92 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001586833846
TypeChannel
Username@Hikicha0_0
Created18 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hikicha0_0

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5,6555,7475,7017 August 2026 — 5,747 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,747 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,736 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,727 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,720 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,708 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,699 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,694 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,693 subscribers3 September 2026 — 5,684 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,671 subscribers13 September 2026 — 5,660 subscribers17 September 2026 — 5,655 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -92. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,641–5,761 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:575,655-5
13 Sept 2026, 09:205,660-11
9 Sept 2026, 16:585,671-13
3 Sept 2026, 23:175,684-9
31 Aug 2026, 07:575,693-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:435,694-5
24 Aug 2026, 15:335,699-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:565,708-12
17 Aug 2026, 14:585,720-7
14 Aug 2026, 13:065,727-9
11 Aug 2026, 09:335,736-4
7 Aug 2026, 22:575,740-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:005,747no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:535,747first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

43 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2660.5%
👍1637.2%
👎12.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 4 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Hikicha0_0. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 4 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,080 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Grvt 에드작 결과 홍예 승리 그는 고고하게 자신이 골드만삭스 출신이라는 것을 결과로 증명해냈습니다.

4👎1

29 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Grvt대장인 홍예는 원래 나쁜 사람이 아니였던 것 같네.. 왜 이렇게 생각했냐면 Grvt에 대응을 어떻게 해야할까 고민을 많이 했기때문 1. TGE 연기 -> 음 이건 그럴 수 있지 2. 갑자기 슬래싱 -> 음 좆같지만 대충 계산해보니 아무리 토막나도 1/3 이상은 받으니까 1배율을 고르는게 가장 낫겠다 3. 또 연기 -> 설마 업비트 빗썸인가 4. 갑자기 베스팅 -> 씨발 도대체 내가 뭘 어떻게 대응할 수 있지? 사실 토큰 수령 동의서인지 뭔지에도 써 있긴했음 ‘팀이 알아서 줄거고 팀 좆대로 분배할거고 심지어 방식도 맘대로 바꿀건데 불만있어도 제기할 자격 없고 팀은 답변할 의무도 없음~‘ 그런데 이렇게 되짚어보니 홍예는 그냥 흑막에 의해 타락해버린게 아닐까 라는 상상을 해봄 1. 사실 홍예씨는 3월에 약속대로 TGE를 하

👍73

17 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC≈4,820 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

GRVT의 TGE연기는 제대로 진득~하게 끓여야 맛있는 사골과 같은 이치임 코베 로드맵 + 바낸 알파가 확정인 상황에서 TGE를 연기하는 이유? 우리가 생각하는 '그거' 말고는 없음 밥먹듯이 약속을 어기고 커뮤니티와 소통하지 않는 이유? CEO인 홍예형은 속으로 '이 십새끼들 어찌됐든 먹여주면 좋아죽을거면서' 라고 생각하고 있는거임 슬래싱하고 TGE연기하면서 욕 거하게 먹더라도 결국 성공적으로 먹여주면 모두들 GRVT를 찬양할거 뻔하니까 그래서 그냥 지금 걍 아무 스탠스도 안취하는거임 '어차피 먹여주면 지랄하다가도 다들 빨아줄거잖아, 너네 어차피 날 빨아주게 되어있다니까? 그러니까 그냥 가만히 좀 쳐 있어라' 딱 이거인거임 아니면? 아니면씨12발진짜이건윤리적으로말도안되는거에요 아무튼 GRVT는 비비고 사골곰탕이 될 바에야

5

10 Jul 2026, 07:19 UTC≈5,100 views23 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

코인판에 정 존나 떨어지는 이유가 유저들 통수 대놓고 치는 개 어망구 터진 씹새끼들이 넘쳐나서임 말장난하고 배벅벅~ 긁으면서 니네가 뭘 할 수 있는데? 시전하면 진짜 부르르 부르르 떠는거 말고는 뭘 할 수 없음 특정 프로젝트 지목이 아니라 그냥 천애고아새끼들이 운영하는 프로젝트들이 늘어나는 것 같은 분위기라 쓴 글입니다

14👍9

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @Hikicha0_0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,385
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,081
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,934
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,814
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,139
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,514
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,798
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,998
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“이것저것 줍는 히키” (@Hikicha0_0), 5,655 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hikicha0_0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.